Rehabilitation needs screening to identify potential beneficiaries: a scoping review

Wouter De Groote, Melissa Corso, Kent Murnaghan, Antony Duttine, Carla Sabariego
{"title":"Rehabilitation needs screening to identify potential beneficiaries: a scoping review","authors":"Wouter De Groote, Melissa Corso, Kent Murnaghan, Antony Duttine, Carla Sabariego","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2023-000523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim is to identify and compare the content of screening tools and needs assessments used to select rehabilitation beneficiaries and to describe the context of their use.Scoping review.We systematically searched five indexed databases for studies published from 1 January 2010 to 3 February 2023.We searched for papers published in English only. Papers describe a screening tool or needs assessment aiming to prospectively select potential beneficiaries of rehabilitation services based on a cut-off score or classification system.We charted the evidence according to the characteristics of the paper, rehabilitation needs screening context, screening tool and content of the screening tool. A descriptive synthesis is provided for screening methodology, settings, target populations, rehabilitation need types and phases of care. The WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health is used to categorise screening items.We identified 24 tools that use a range of screening methodologies, but mostly questionnaires that are used by health workers. Most tools have been proposed for the identification of a rehabilitation beneficiary among people with selected health conditions assessing the need to access a specific rehabilitation intervention, programme or occupational group. The majority of tools screen for current functioning limitations, and this is often the only screening component. When mapping screening items with the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), almost all ICF chapters for body functions and activities and participation have been included across screening tools, with the following most frequently included ICF categories: emotional functions (b152), acquiring, keeping and terminating a job (d845), sensation of pain (b280) and carrying out daily routine (d230).Rehabilitation need screening tools commonly include the screening for current functioning limitations among people with selected health conditions. A screening tool that is applicable across health conditions and settings is not available.","PeriodicalId":117861,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2023-000523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim is to identify and compare the content of screening tools and needs assessments used to select rehabilitation beneficiaries and to describe the context of their use.Scoping review.We systematically searched five indexed databases for studies published from 1 January 2010 to 3 February 2023.We searched for papers published in English only. Papers describe a screening tool or needs assessment aiming to prospectively select potential beneficiaries of rehabilitation services based on a cut-off score or classification system.We charted the evidence according to the characteristics of the paper, rehabilitation needs screening context, screening tool and content of the screening tool. A descriptive synthesis is provided for screening methodology, settings, target populations, rehabilitation need types and phases of care. The WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health is used to categorise screening items.We identified 24 tools that use a range of screening methodologies, but mostly questionnaires that are used by health workers. Most tools have been proposed for the identification of a rehabilitation beneficiary among people with selected health conditions assessing the need to access a specific rehabilitation intervention, programme or occupational group. The majority of tools screen for current functioning limitations, and this is often the only screening component. When mapping screening items with the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), almost all ICF chapters for body functions and activities and participation have been included across screening tools, with the following most frequently included ICF categories: emotional functions (b152), acquiring, keeping and terminating a job (d845), sensation of pain (b280) and carrying out daily routine (d230).Rehabilitation need screening tools commonly include the screening for current functioning limitations among people with selected health conditions. A screening tool that is applicable across health conditions and settings is not available.
筛查康复需求以确定潜在受益者:范围审查
我们系统地检索了五个索引数据库中 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 2 月 3 日期间发表的研究报告。我们根据论文的特点、康复需求筛查背景、筛查工具和筛查工具的内容对证据进行了分类。我们根据论文的特点、康复需求筛查背景、筛查工具和筛查工具的内容对证据进行了分类,并对筛查方法、环境、目标人群、康复需求类型和护理阶段进行了描述性综合。我们确定了 24 种筛查工具,这些工具使用了一系列筛查方法,但大多是由卫生工作者使用的问卷。大多数工具都是为确定特定健康状况人群中的康复受益人而提出的,以评估是否需要接受特定的康复干预、计划或职业群体。大多数工具都筛查当前的功能限制,这往往是唯一的筛查内容。在将筛查项目与世界卫生组织的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)进行比对时,几乎所有的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》中关于身体功能以及活动和参与的章节都被筛查工具所包含,其中最常包含的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》类别如下:情感功能(b152),获得、保持和终止工作(d845),疼痛感觉(b280)和进行日常活动(d230)。目前还没有适用于各种健康状况和环境的筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信