When outpatient appointment meets online consultation: A joint scheduling optimization framework

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Hainan Guo , Yue Xie , Bowen Jiang , Jiafu Tang
{"title":"When outpatient appointment meets online consultation: A joint scheduling optimization framework","authors":"Hainan Guo ,&nbsp;Yue Xie ,&nbsp;Bowen Jiang ,&nbsp;Jiafu Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While the provision of Online Consultation Services (OCS) has brought convenience to patients, the original offline outpatient workflow may struggle to maintain efficiency. Hospital managers’ concerns lie on how to reconcile the operations of offline service with the provision of OCS and what are the latent impacts of OCS on the operational performances of healthcare system. The outpatient appointment scheduling is a crucial part of the workflow decision that affects both quality of offline services and the fragmented idle time that doctors can reply to their Follow-up patients (FUP) during working hours. To smooth the fluctuations in workload of OCS, we introduce a novel decision variable—the recommended maximum number of FUP that a doctor should serve during overtime hours (FUP-MN)—and propose an inter-day service shifting strategy that any requests for OCS exceeding the FUP-MN will be deferred to be served in the fragmented idle time of the next session. We formulate a stochastic programming model to search for the optimal combination of the appointment schedule and FUP-MN. Propositions are conducted to demonstrate the model is valid not only in coordinating the dual demand for online and offline services, but also in restricting the potential overflow of OCS requests. We provide a general solution approach and also develop a heuristic algorithm to quickly obtain optimal workflows at different OCS demand levels. The numerical experimental results indicate that an appropriate introduction of OCS can give the healthcare system a strong ability to resist the adverse effects of uncertainty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324000677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the provision of Online Consultation Services (OCS) has brought convenience to patients, the original offline outpatient workflow may struggle to maintain efficiency. Hospital managers’ concerns lie on how to reconcile the operations of offline service with the provision of OCS and what are the latent impacts of OCS on the operational performances of healthcare system. The outpatient appointment scheduling is a crucial part of the workflow decision that affects both quality of offline services and the fragmented idle time that doctors can reply to their Follow-up patients (FUP) during working hours. To smooth the fluctuations in workload of OCS, we introduce a novel decision variable—the recommended maximum number of FUP that a doctor should serve during overtime hours (FUP-MN)—and propose an inter-day service shifting strategy that any requests for OCS exceeding the FUP-MN will be deferred to be served in the fragmented idle time of the next session. We formulate a stochastic programming model to search for the optimal combination of the appointment schedule and FUP-MN. Propositions are conducted to demonstrate the model is valid not only in coordinating the dual demand for online and offline services, but also in restricting the potential overflow of OCS requests. We provide a general solution approach and also develop a heuristic algorithm to quickly obtain optimal workflows at different OCS demand levels. The numerical experimental results indicate that an appropriate introduction of OCS can give the healthcare system a strong ability to resist the adverse effects of uncertainty.

当门诊预约遇上在线咨询:联合排班优化框架
在线咨询服务(OCS)为患者带来了便利,但原有的线下门诊工作流程可能难以维持效率。医院管理者关心的是,如何协调线下服务与在线咨询服务的运作,以及在线咨询服务对医疗系统运作绩效的潜在影响。门诊预约安排是工作流程决策的关键部分,既影响线下服务的质量,也影响医生在工作时间内回复复诊病人(FUP)的碎片化空闲时间。为了平滑门诊预约工作量的波动,我们引入了一个新的决策变量--医生在加班时间内应服务的复诊病人的建议最大数量(FUP-MN)--并提出了一种跨日服务转移策略,即任何超过 FUP-MN 的门诊预约请求都将推迟到下一个时段的碎片空闲时间内处理。我们建立了一个随机编程模型,以寻找预约时间表和 FUP-MN 的最佳组合。我们提出了一些命题,以证明该模型不仅在协调在线和离线服务的双重需求方面有效,而且在限制 OCS 请求的潜在溢出方面也有效。我们提供了一种通用的求解方法,还开发了一种启发式算法,以快速获得不同 OCS 需求水平下的最优工作流。数值实验结果表明,适当引入 OCS 可以使医疗系统具有很强的抵御不确定性不利影响的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信