A Deep Learning Model for Predicting Molecular Subtype of Breast Cancer by Fusing Multiple Sequences of DCE-MRI From Two Institutes

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"A Deep Learning Model for Predicting Molecular Subtype of Breast Cancer by Fusing Multiple Sequences of DCE-MRI From Two Institutes","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of deep learning (DL) in predicting different breast cancer molecular subtypes using DCE-MRI from two institutes.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 366 breast cancer patients from two institutes, divided into training (<em>n</em> = 292), validation (<em>n</em> = 49) and testing (<em>n</em> = 25) sets. We first transformed the public DCE-MRI appearance to ours to alleviate small-data-size and class-imbalance issues. Second, we developed a multi-branch convolutional-neural-network (MBCNN) to perform molecular subtype prediction. Third, we assessed the MBCNN with different regions of interest (ROIs) and fusion strategies, and compared it to previous DL models. Area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) were used to assess different models. Delong-test was used for the comparison of different groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>MBCNN achieved the optimal performance under intermediate fusion and ROI size of 80 pixels with appearance transformation. It outperformed CNN and convolutional long-short-term-memory (CLSTM) in predicting luminal B, HER2-enriched and TN subtypes, but without demonstrating statistical significance except against CNN in TN subtypes, with testing AUCs of 0.8182 vs. [0.7208, 0.7922] (<span><math><mi>p</mi></math></span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.44, 0.80), 0.8500 vs. [0.7300, 0.8200] (<span><math><mi>p</mi></math></span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.36, 0.70) and 0.8900 vs. [0.7600, 0.8300] (<span><math><mi>p</mi></math></span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03, 0.63), respectively. When predicting luminal A, MBCNN outperformed CNN with AUCs of 0.8571 vs. 0.7619 (<span><math><mi>p</mi></math></span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.08) without achieving statistical significance, and is comparable to CLSTM. For four-subtype prediction, MBCNN achieved an ACC of 0.64, better than CNN and CLSTM models with ACCs of 0.48 and 0.52, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Developed DL model with the feature extraction and fusion of DCE-MRI from two institutes enabled preoperative prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes with high diagnostic performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224001442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

To evaluate the performance of deep learning (DL) in predicting different breast cancer molecular subtypes using DCE-MRI from two institutes.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 366 breast cancer patients from two institutes, divided into training (n = 292), validation (n = 49) and testing (n = 25) sets. We first transformed the public DCE-MRI appearance to ours to alleviate small-data-size and class-imbalance issues. Second, we developed a multi-branch convolutional-neural-network (MBCNN) to perform molecular subtype prediction. Third, we assessed the MBCNN with different regions of interest (ROIs) and fusion strategies, and compared it to previous DL models. Area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) were used to assess different models. Delong-test was used for the comparison of different groups.

Results

MBCNN achieved the optimal performance under intermediate fusion and ROI size of 80 pixels with appearance transformation. It outperformed CNN and convolutional long-short-term-memory (CLSTM) in predicting luminal B, HER2-enriched and TN subtypes, but without demonstrating statistical significance except against CNN in TN subtypes, with testing AUCs of 0.8182 vs. [0.7208, 0.7922] (p = 0.44, 0.80), 0.8500 vs. [0.7300, 0.8200] (p = 0.36, 0.70) and 0.8900 vs. [0.7600, 0.8300] (p = 0.03, 0.63), respectively. When predicting luminal A, MBCNN outperformed CNN with AUCs of 0.8571 vs. 0.7619 (p = 0.08) without achieving statistical significance, and is comparable to CLSTM. For four-subtype prediction, MBCNN achieved an ACC of 0.64, better than CNN and CLSTM models with ACCs of 0.48 and 0.52, respectively.

Conclusion

Developed DL model with the feature extraction and fusion of DCE-MRI from two institutes enabled preoperative prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes with high diagnostic performance.
通过融合两家研究所的多序列 DCE-MRI 预测乳腺癌分子亚型的深度学习模型。
材料与方法这项回顾性研究纳入了来自两家研究所的 366 名乳腺癌患者,分为训练集(n = 292)、验证集(n = 49)和测试集(n = 25)。我们首先将公开的 DCE-MRI 图像转换成我们的图像,以缓解数据量小和类别不平衡的问题。其次,我们开发了多分支卷积神经网络(MBCNN)来进行分子亚型预测。第三,我们用不同的兴趣区域(ROI)和融合策略对 MBCNN 进行了评估,并将其与之前的 DL 模型进行了比较。曲线下面积(AUC)和准确率(ACC)用于评估不同的模型。结果 在中间融合和 ROI 大小为 80 像素的情况下,MBCNN 通过外观变换获得了最佳性能。它在预测管腔 B 型、HER2-富集型和 TN 亚型方面的表现优于 CNN 和卷积长短期记忆(CLSTM),但在 TN 亚型方面与 CNN 相比没有统计学意义,其测试 AUC 为 0.8182 vs. [0.7208, 0.7922] (p = 0.44, 0.80)、0.8500 vs. [0.7300, 0.8200] (p = 0.36, 0.70) 和 0.8900 vs. [0.7600, 0.8300] (p = 0.03, 0.63)。在预测管腔 A 时,MBCNN 的 AUC 值为 0.8571 vs. 0.7619(p = 0.08),优于 CNN,但未达到统计学显著性,与 CLSTM 相当。在四种亚型预测方面,MBCNN 的 ACC 为 0.64,优于 CNN 和 CLSTM 模型的 ACC(分别为 0.48 和 0.52)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信