Saliency Models Reveal Reduced Top-Down Attention in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Naturalistic Eye-Tracking Study

Sabine Dziemian PhD , Gaston Bujia MSc , Paul Prasse PhD , Zofia Barańczuk-Turska PhD , Lena A. Jäger PhD , Juan E. Kamienkowski PhD , Nicolas Langer PhD
{"title":"Saliency Models Reveal Reduced Top-Down Attention in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Naturalistic Eye-Tracking Study","authors":"Sabine Dziemian PhD ,&nbsp;Gaston Bujia MSc ,&nbsp;Paul Prasse PhD ,&nbsp;Zofia Barańczuk-Turska PhD ,&nbsp;Lena A. Jäger PhD ,&nbsp;Juan E. Kamienkowski PhD ,&nbsp;Nicolas Langer PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a highly prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder. It is associated with deficits in executive functions, especially in visual attention. Deviant visual attention in ADHD is suspected to arise from imbalances between top-down and bottom-up mechanisms. However, it is unclear which of these mechanisms propels the aberrant visual attention.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In 815 medication-naïve children and adolescents (age range 5-21 years), differences in visual attention in participants with ADHD and neurotypical controls were investigated using eye tracking in a naturalistic video viewing task. Two opposing saliency models were used. Finegrained, based on low-level image features, was chosen to estimate bottom-up visually relevant areas. ViNet, a higher-level saliency model based on deep neural networks and trained on the gaze of neurotypical controls, was selected to determine top-down visually relevant regions. Correspondence between gaze and both saliency maps was calculated using normalized scanpath saliency, thus measuring the extent of coherence to bottom-up and top-down relevant contents.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants with combined ADHD showed lower mean normalized scanpath saliency for the top-down saliency map, but not the bottom-up one, compared with neurotypical controls. This contrast indicates poorer top-down control as a major contributor to impaired visual attention in combined ADHD. There was no significant effect for the predominantly inattentive ADHD group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrated the use of eye tracking for differentiating between top-down and bottom-up visual attention. It shows that in combined ADHD, a reduction of top-down visual attention is key to an impaired competition between bottom-up and top-down visual attention.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>This study used eye-tracking to investigate visual attention differences during naturalistic video viewing among 815 medication-naïve children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and neurotypical controls. Computational models were used to quantify bottom-up and top-down mechanisms of visual attention to video content. The study found that individuals with ADHD had reduced control over top-down visual attention, suggesting an imbalance in visual attention mechanisms that may be targeted during intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73525,"journal":{"name":"JAACAP open","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 192-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAACAP open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732924000280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a highly prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder. It is associated with deficits in executive functions, especially in visual attention. Deviant visual attention in ADHD is suspected to arise from imbalances between top-down and bottom-up mechanisms. However, it is unclear which of these mechanisms propels the aberrant visual attention.

Method

In 815 medication-naïve children and adolescents (age range 5-21 years), differences in visual attention in participants with ADHD and neurotypical controls were investigated using eye tracking in a naturalistic video viewing task. Two opposing saliency models were used. Finegrained, based on low-level image features, was chosen to estimate bottom-up visually relevant areas. ViNet, a higher-level saliency model based on deep neural networks and trained on the gaze of neurotypical controls, was selected to determine top-down visually relevant regions. Correspondence between gaze and both saliency maps was calculated using normalized scanpath saliency, thus measuring the extent of coherence to bottom-up and top-down relevant contents.

Results

Participants with combined ADHD showed lower mean normalized scanpath saliency for the top-down saliency map, but not the bottom-up one, compared with neurotypical controls. This contrast indicates poorer top-down control as a major contributor to impaired visual attention in combined ADHD. There was no significant effect for the predominantly inattentive ADHD group.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the use of eye tracking for differentiating between top-down and bottom-up visual attention. It shows that in combined ADHD, a reduction of top-down visual attention is key to an impaired competition between bottom-up and top-down visual attention.

Plain language summary

This study used eye-tracking to investigate visual attention differences during naturalistic video viewing among 815 medication-naïve children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and neurotypical controls. Computational models were used to quantify bottom-up and top-down mechanisms of visual attention to video content. The study found that individuals with ADHD had reduced control over top-down visual attention, suggesting an imbalance in visual attention mechanisms that may be targeted during intervention.
显著性模型揭示了注意力缺陷/多动障碍患者自上而下注意力的降低:自然眼动追踪研究
目的注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)是一种非常普遍的神经发育障碍。它与执行功能的缺陷,尤其是视觉注意力的缺陷有关。注意力缺陷多动障碍的视觉注意异常被怀疑是由自上而下和自下而上机制的不平衡引起的。然而,目前尚不清楚这些机制中的哪一个推动了异常的视觉注意力。方法对815名medication-naïve儿童和青少年(年龄5 ~ 21岁)进行眼动追踪,研究ADHD和正常对照组在自然视频观看任务中的视觉注意差异。使用了两个相反的显著性模型。选择基于底层图像特征的细粒度来估计自下而上的视觉相关区域。ViNet是一种基于深度神经网络的高级显著性模型,经过神经典型对照者的注视训练,被用来确定自上而下的视觉相关区域。使用归一化扫描路径显著性计算凝视与两个显著性图之间的对应关系,从而测量自底向上和自顶向下相关内容的一致性程度。结果与神经正常对照组相比,合并ADHD患者在自上而下显著性图上的标准化扫描路径显著性均值较低,而在自下而上显著性图上的标准化扫描路径显著性均值较低。这一对比表明,较差的自上而下控制是合并多动症患者视觉注意力受损的主要原因。对于注意力不集中的ADHD组没有显著的影响。结论眼动追踪可以区分自上而下和自下而上的视觉注意。研究表明,在合并多动症中,自上而下的视觉注意的减少是自下而上和自上而下的视觉注意之间竞争受损的关键。本研究采用眼动追踪法调查815名medication-naïve儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和正常对照组在观看自然视频时的视觉注意差异。计算模型用于量化自底向上和自顶向下对视频内容的视觉注意机制。研究发现,患有多动症的人对自上而下的视觉注意的控制能力下降,这表明视觉注意机制的不平衡可能是干预期间的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAACAP open
JAACAP open Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信