Perception of Patients, Physicians, and Chaperones Regarding the Use of Chaperones During Patient Examinations for Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Ou Kai Qi, Zhen Ning Wong, Zhen Yu Wong
{"title":"Perception of Patients, Physicians, and Chaperones Regarding the Use of Chaperones During Patient Examinations for Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ou Kai Qi, Zhen Ning Wong, Zhen Yu Wong","doi":"10.1097/PSN.0000000000000560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this systematic review, we searched electronic databases for literature addressing physician use of chaperones during examinations of patients undergoing plastic surgery from the perspective of the patient, physician, and chaperone from inception of the database until April 2023. After screening 939 articles, we included seven studies in a systematic review. We conducted an inductive thematic analysis of four domains (physician perspective, patient perspective, chaperone perspective, and chaperone documentation). The results of the analysis showed that surgeons who are experienced, are men, or have received education related to using chaperones are more likely to provide chaperones during patient examinations for medicolegal protection and patient comfort. A small percentage of surgeons have faced accusations from patients of inappropriate behavior. Most of these incidents have occurred without a chaperone present. Patients who have long associations with a particular plastic surgery practice are less likely to want a chaperone. When physicians examine nonsensitive areas, most patients prefer having no chaperone. However, young patients and patients undergoing reconstructive procedures are more likely to request chaperones. Patients prefer having family members or friends serve as chaperones. Notably, despite the presence of a chaperone, we found that documentation of the presence of a chaperone was inadequate. Using a chaperone helps establish trust and ensure patient comfort. Further research, including qualitative studies and multinational approaches, is warranted to gain deeper insights and develop comprehensive guidelines for chaperone use that empowers both patients and health care providers.","PeriodicalId":74460,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and aesthetic nursing","volume":"388 4","pages":"140-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and aesthetic nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PSN.0000000000000560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this systematic review, we searched electronic databases for literature addressing physician use of chaperones during examinations of patients undergoing plastic surgery from the perspective of the patient, physician, and chaperone from inception of the database until April 2023. After screening 939 articles, we included seven studies in a systematic review. We conducted an inductive thematic analysis of four domains (physician perspective, patient perspective, chaperone perspective, and chaperone documentation). The results of the analysis showed that surgeons who are experienced, are men, or have received education related to using chaperones are more likely to provide chaperones during patient examinations for medicolegal protection and patient comfort. A small percentage of surgeons have faced accusations from patients of inappropriate behavior. Most of these incidents have occurred without a chaperone present. Patients who have long associations with a particular plastic surgery practice are less likely to want a chaperone. When physicians examine nonsensitive areas, most patients prefer having no chaperone. However, young patients and patients undergoing reconstructive procedures are more likely to request chaperones. Patients prefer having family members or friends serve as chaperones. Notably, despite the presence of a chaperone, we found that documentation of the presence of a chaperone was inadequate. Using a chaperone helps establish trust and ensure patient comfort. Further research, including qualitative studies and multinational approaches, is warranted to gain deeper insights and develop comprehensive guidelines for chaperone use that empowers both patients and health care providers.
患者、医生和陪护对整形外科患者检查期间使用陪护的看法:系统回顾
在这篇系统性综述中,我们在电子数据库中搜索了从数据库建立之初到 2023 年 4 月的文献,从患者、医生和陪护的角度探讨了医生在对接受整形手术的患者进行检查时使用陪护的情况。在筛选了 939 篇文章后,我们将 7 项研究纳入了系统性综述。我们对四个领域(医生视角、患者视角、陪护视角和陪护记录)进行了归纳主题分析。分析结果表明,经验丰富的外科医生、男性外科医生或接受过与使用陪护相关教育的外科医生更有可能在患者检查期间提供陪护,以提供医疗法律保护并让患者感到舒适。有一小部分外科医生曾被患者指控有不当行为。大多数此类事件都是在没有陪护人员在场的情况下发生的。与特定整形外科诊所有长期联系的患者不太可能希望有陪护。当医生检查非敏感区域时,大多数患者都希望没有陪护。不过,年轻患者和接受整形手术的患者更有可能要求陪护。患者更愿意让家人或朋友担任陪护。值得注意的是,尽管有陪护,但我们发现陪护在场的记录并不充分。使用陪护有助于建立信任,确保患者舒适。我们有必要开展进一步的研究,包括定性研究和多国研究,以获得更深入的见解,并为陪护的使用制定全面的指导原则,从而增强患者和医疗服务提供者的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信