Lost in the Shuffle: Low Health Literacy in Geriatric Fracture Patients and Families Regarding Post-Acute Care—A Prospective Study

Stephanie Merimee, Ashley Ali, Katheryne Downes, Joanna Mullins, Mir Ibrahim Sajid, Hassan Mir
{"title":"Lost in the Shuffle: Low Health Literacy in Geriatric Fracture Patients and Families Regarding Post-Acute Care—A Prospective Study","authors":"Stephanie Merimee, Ashley Ali, Katheryne Downes, Joanna Mullins, Mir Ibrahim Sajid, Hassan Mir","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aims to evaluate health literacy (HL) in geriatric orthopaedic trauma patients and their families as it relates to their post-acute care (PAC) in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs). Methods: This nonrandomized controlled clinical trial included patients aged 65 years and older treated for acute fracture at a Level 1 trauma center and discharged to either IRF or SNF. First 106 patients enrolled served as the control group and received standard discharge instructions. The second 101 patients were given a set of oral and written instructions regarding PAC detailing important questions to ask upon arrival to their facility. Results: The mean HL score for all patients/families was 2.4 out of 5. No significant difference was noted in HL scores (2.4 versus 2.3) or median LOS (22 versus 28 days) between the control and intervention groups. Family involvement (68%) slightly improved HL scores (2.6 versus 1.9, P < 0.001). Patients discharged to IRF had better HL scores (3.4 versus 2.3, P < 0.001), shorter LOS (median 15 vs 30 days, P < 0.001), and trended toward improved knowledge of discharge goals (48.1% versus 35.6%) than those in SNF. Conclusion: System-wide solutions are necessary to improve geriatric HL and optimize outcomes in orthopaedic trauma.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"361 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to evaluate health literacy (HL) in geriatric orthopaedic trauma patients and their families as it relates to their post-acute care (PAC) in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs). Methods: This nonrandomized controlled clinical trial included patients aged 65 years and older treated for acute fracture at a Level 1 trauma center and discharged to either IRF or SNF. First 106 patients enrolled served as the control group and received standard discharge instructions. The second 101 patients were given a set of oral and written instructions regarding PAC detailing important questions to ask upon arrival to their facility. Results: The mean HL score for all patients/families was 2.4 out of 5. No significant difference was noted in HL scores (2.4 versus 2.3) or median LOS (22 versus 28 days) between the control and intervention groups. Family involvement (68%) slightly improved HL scores (2.6 versus 1.9, P < 0.001). Patients discharged to IRF had better HL scores (3.4 versus 2.3, P < 0.001), shorter LOS (median 15 vs 30 days, P < 0.001), and trended toward improved knowledge of discharge goals (48.1% versus 35.6%) than those in SNF. Conclusion: System-wide solutions are necessary to improve geriatric HL and optimize outcomes in orthopaedic trauma.
在混乱中迷失:老年骨折患者及家属对急性期后护理的低健康素养--一项前瞻性研究
导言:本研究旨在评估老年骨科创伤患者及其家属的健康素养(HL),因为这与他们在专业护理机构(SNF)和住院康复机构(IRF)接受的急性期后护理(PAC)有关。方法:这项非随机对照临床试验包括在一级创伤中心接受急性骨折治疗、出院后入住IRF或SNF的65岁及以上患者。首批 106 名患者作为对照组,接受标准的出院指导。第二组的 101 名患者获得了一套有关 PAC 的口头和书面指导,其中详细说明了患者到达医疗机构后应询问的重要问题。结果:所有患者/家属的平均 HL 得分为 2.4 分(满分 5 分)。对照组和干预组在 HL 评分(2.4 分对 2.3 分)或中位生命周期(22 天对 28 天)方面没有明显差异。家庭参与(68%)略微提高了 HL 评分(2.6 对 1.9,P < 0.001)。与住在 SNF 的患者相比,出院到 IRF 的患者 HL 评分更高(3.4 分对 2.3 分,P < 0.001),LOS 更短(中位数 15 天对 30 天,P < 0.001),对出院目标的了解也有改善趋势(48.1% 对 35.6%)。结论:有必要采取全系统解决方案来改善老年 HL 并优化创伤骨科的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信