Team Science Competencies for Clinical Research Professionals: A Multi-Leveled Delphi Approach

Angela Mendell, Jessica Fritter, Shirley Helm, B. Capili, Laura Hildreth, Kathryn Johnson, Christa Varnadoe, Elizabeth Kopras, Jennifer Sprecher, Nicole Summerside, Karen Carter, Andrea Ronning, Nicole L. Exe, H. R. Kolb, C. Jones
{"title":"Team Science Competencies for Clinical Research Professionals: A Multi-Leveled Delphi Approach","authors":"Angela Mendell, Jessica Fritter, Shirley Helm, B. Capili, Laura Hildreth, Kathryn Johnson, Christa Varnadoe, Elizabeth Kopras, Jennifer Sprecher, Nicole Summerside, Karen Carter, Andrea Ronning, Nicole L. Exe, H. R. Kolb, C. Jones","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The knowledge, skills, and abilities needed for clinical research professionals (CRPs) are described in the Joint Task Force (JTF) for Clinical Trial Competencies Framework as a basis for leveled educational programs, training curricula, and certification. There is a paucity of literature addressing team science competencies tailored to CRPs. Gaps in training, research, and education can restrict their capability to effectively contribute to team science. Materials/Methods: The CRP Team Science team consisted of 18 members from 7 clinical and translational science awarded institutions. We employed a multi-stage, modified Delphi approach to define “Smart Skills” and leveled team science skills examples using individual and team science competencies of Lotrechianno et al. 1 Results: Overall, 59 team science Smart Skills were identified resulting in 177 skills examples across three levels: fundamental, skilled, and advanced. Two examples of the leveled skillsets for individual and team competencies are illustrated. Two vignettes were created to illustrate application for training. Discussion: This work provides a first-ever application of team science for CRPs by defining specific individual and team science competencies for each level of the CRP career life course. This work will enhance the JTF Domains 7 (Leadership and Professionalism) and 8 (Communication and Teamwork) which are often lacking in CRP training programs. The supplement provides a full set of skills and examples from this work. Conclusion: Developing team science skills for CRPs may contribute to more effective collaborations across interdisciplinary clinical research teams. These skills may also improve research outcomes and stabilize the CRP workforce.","PeriodicalId":508693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"318 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The knowledge, skills, and abilities needed for clinical research professionals (CRPs) are described in the Joint Task Force (JTF) for Clinical Trial Competencies Framework as a basis for leveled educational programs, training curricula, and certification. There is a paucity of literature addressing team science competencies tailored to CRPs. Gaps in training, research, and education can restrict their capability to effectively contribute to team science. Materials/Methods: The CRP Team Science team consisted of 18 members from 7 clinical and translational science awarded institutions. We employed a multi-stage, modified Delphi approach to define “Smart Skills” and leveled team science skills examples using individual and team science competencies of Lotrechianno et al. 1 Results: Overall, 59 team science Smart Skills were identified resulting in 177 skills examples across three levels: fundamental, skilled, and advanced. Two examples of the leveled skillsets for individual and team competencies are illustrated. Two vignettes were created to illustrate application for training. Discussion: This work provides a first-ever application of team science for CRPs by defining specific individual and team science competencies for each level of the CRP career life course. This work will enhance the JTF Domains 7 (Leadership and Professionalism) and 8 (Communication and Teamwork) which are often lacking in CRP training programs. The supplement provides a full set of skills and examples from this work. Conclusion: Developing team science skills for CRPs may contribute to more effective collaborations across interdisciplinary clinical research teams. These skills may also improve research outcomes and stabilize the CRP workforce.
临床研究专业人员的团队科学能力:多层次德尔菲法
背景:临床试验能力框架联合工作组(JTF)将临床研究专业人员(CRP)所需的知识、技能和能力描述为分级教育计划、培训课程和认证的基础。针对临床试验专业人员的团队科学能力的文献很少。培训、研究和教育方面的差距会限制他们为团队科学做出有效贡献的能力。材料/方法:CRP 团队科学小组由来自 7 家临床和转化科学获奖机构的 18 名成员组成。我们采用了多阶段、改良德尔菲法来定义 "智能技能",并利用 Lotrechianno 等人的个人和团队科学能力对团队科学技能范例进行了分级:总体而言,共确定了 59 项团队科学智能技能,形成了 177 个技能范例,分为基础、熟练和高级三个级别。图中展示了个人和团队能力的两个分级技能范例。还创建了两个小故事来说明在培训中的应用。讨论:这项工作首次将团队科学应用于中央后备警察,为中央后备警察职业生涯的每个阶段定义了具体的个人和团队科学能力。这项工作将加强联合特遣队领域 7(领导力与专业精神)和领域 8(沟通与团队合作),而这两个领域往往是中央后备警察培训计划所缺乏的。补编提供了这项工作的全套技能和实例。结论:培养临床研究人员的团队科学技能有助于跨学科临床研究团队之间更有效的合作。这些技能还可以改善研究成果,稳定临床研究人员队伍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书