The 15 January 2022 Hunga (Tonga) eruption: A gas-driven climactic explosion

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Richard W. Henley , Cornel E.J. de Ronde , Richard J. Arculus , Graham Hughes , Thanh-Son Pham , Ana S. Casas , Vasily Titov , Sharon L. Walker
{"title":"The 15 January 2022 Hunga (Tonga) eruption: A gas-driven climactic explosion","authors":"Richard W. Henley ,&nbsp;Cornel E.J. de Ronde ,&nbsp;Richard J. Arculus ,&nbsp;Graham Hughes ,&nbsp;Thanh-Son Pham ,&nbsp;Ana S. Casas ,&nbsp;Vasily Titov ,&nbsp;Sharon L. Walker","doi":"10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2024.108077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An extraordinarily powerful, explosive eruption occurred from Hunga volcano in the Tonga island arc on 15 January 2022 and generated an eruption column 58 km high. The explosive eruption also generated atmospheric gravity waves, extreme runup tsunamis and quite unusual and destructive meteotsunamis. Together these place this VEI 6 eruption as, globally, one of the largest of the past 300 years.</p><p>Based on the oceanic context of Hunga volcano, it has previously been assumed that the eruption was phreatomagmatic through a fuel-coolant Surtseyan-type interaction, but this is not supported by satellite imagery. Similarly, it has been suggested that a caldera-collapse was the eruption trigger, but this is not supported by bathymetric data or the seismicity recorded during the eruption. Here we develop a new model based on the observed energetics and time sequence of the eruption integrated with understanding of the internal structure of active volcanoes and their characteristic high flux discharges of volcanic gas.</p><p>It has been shown elsewhere that magma-derived reactive gases (H<sub>2</sub>O, CO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, HCl, etc) aggressively alter the volcanic rocks in the core of a volcano leading to self-sealing of gas flow to the surface and consequent changes to deviatoric stress in the structure. Common minerals developed by these reactions include anhydrite (CaSO<sub>4</sub>), sulphides and silica (quartz), all of which have been recorded in volcanic ejecta including at Hunga.</p><p>We here develop a first order numerical model that quantifies how the free discharge of such gas to the surface may progressively become choked by these sealing reactions leading to increased internal gas pressure. Hydraulic fracture of the seal occurs when the transmitted pressure of the compressed magmatic gas beneath the seal increases to a value greater than the lithostatic pressure plus the tensile strength of the sealed rock. This initiates the explosive release of compressed gas whose high-power discharge progressively develops and enlarges a crater. At the same time, the explosion feeds upon itself by generating larger pressure gradients in the pressurized gas within the fractured porous rock mass of the core of the volcano. Excavation of the crater may intersect high level intrusions and produce the pumice rafts that were observed after the eruption. The eruption itself diminished in intensity as the gas pressure in the reservoir declined.</p><p>At Hunga, the eruption excavated an 850 m deep, 2-3 km diameter steep-walled crater. This volume may be assumed to approximate the volume of fractured porous rock (the control volume of the eruption) whose trapped gas was mined by the eruption until surrounding gas pressure was depleted. Our numerical model shows that the calculated potential energy of the trapped compressed gas matches the independent observations of the scale of the eruption. Sensor data have since shown that gas bubble flares continued for at least 6 months after the eruption indicating continued depletion of the gas reservoir of rocks surrounding the new crater. The systems-based, gas-driven model for the Hunga climactic eruption developed here also applies to Plinean-type eruptions on subaerial arc volcanoes such as at Pinatubo (Philippines) 1991.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","volume":"451 ","pages":"Article 108077"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377027324000696/pdfft?md5=f35894257444b47659252cf03cfcd33c&pid=1-s2.0-S0377027324000696-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377027324000696","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An extraordinarily powerful, explosive eruption occurred from Hunga volcano in the Tonga island arc on 15 January 2022 and generated an eruption column 58 km high. The explosive eruption also generated atmospheric gravity waves, extreme runup tsunamis and quite unusual and destructive meteotsunamis. Together these place this VEI 6 eruption as, globally, one of the largest of the past 300 years.

Based on the oceanic context of Hunga volcano, it has previously been assumed that the eruption was phreatomagmatic through a fuel-coolant Surtseyan-type interaction, but this is not supported by satellite imagery. Similarly, it has been suggested that a caldera-collapse was the eruption trigger, but this is not supported by bathymetric data or the seismicity recorded during the eruption. Here we develop a new model based on the observed energetics and time sequence of the eruption integrated with understanding of the internal structure of active volcanoes and their characteristic high flux discharges of volcanic gas.

It has been shown elsewhere that magma-derived reactive gases (H2O, CO2, SO2, HCl, etc) aggressively alter the volcanic rocks in the core of a volcano leading to self-sealing of gas flow to the surface and consequent changes to deviatoric stress in the structure. Common minerals developed by these reactions include anhydrite (CaSO4), sulphides and silica (quartz), all of which have been recorded in volcanic ejecta including at Hunga.

We here develop a first order numerical model that quantifies how the free discharge of such gas to the surface may progressively become choked by these sealing reactions leading to increased internal gas pressure. Hydraulic fracture of the seal occurs when the transmitted pressure of the compressed magmatic gas beneath the seal increases to a value greater than the lithostatic pressure plus the tensile strength of the sealed rock. This initiates the explosive release of compressed gas whose high-power discharge progressively develops and enlarges a crater. At the same time, the explosion feeds upon itself by generating larger pressure gradients in the pressurized gas within the fractured porous rock mass of the core of the volcano. Excavation of the crater may intersect high level intrusions and produce the pumice rafts that were observed after the eruption. The eruption itself diminished in intensity as the gas pressure in the reservoir declined.

At Hunga, the eruption excavated an 850 m deep, 2-3 km diameter steep-walled crater. This volume may be assumed to approximate the volume of fractured porous rock (the control volume of the eruption) whose trapped gas was mined by the eruption until surrounding gas pressure was depleted. Our numerical model shows that the calculated potential energy of the trapped compressed gas matches the independent observations of the scale of the eruption. Sensor data have since shown that gas bubble flares continued for at least 6 months after the eruption indicating continued depletion of the gas reservoir of rocks surrounding the new crater. The systems-based, gas-driven model for the Hunga climactic eruption developed here also applies to Plinean-type eruptions on subaerial arc volcanoes such as at Pinatubo (Philippines) 1991.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2022 年 1 月 15 日 Hunga(汤加)火山爆发:气体驱动的气候爆炸
2022 年 1 月 15 日,汤加岛弧的洪加火山发生了一次异常强烈的爆炸性喷发,喷发柱高达 58 公里。这次爆炸性喷发还产生了大气重力波、极度奔腾的海啸和非常不寻常的破坏性流星雨。根据洪加火山的海洋背景,以前曾假设这次喷发是通过燃料-冷却剂-苏尔塞扬型相互作用而形成的喷火,但卫星图像并不支持这一假设。同样,也有人认为火山口塌陷是火山爆发的触发因素,但水深测量数据或火山爆发期间记录的地震活动都不支持这一观点。在这里,我们根据观测到的喷发能量和时间顺序,结合对活火山内部结构及其特有的高通量火山气体排放的理解,建立了一个新的模型。其他地方的研究表明,岩浆衍生的活性气体(H2O、CO2、SO2、HCl 等)会强烈改变火山核心的火山岩,导致气体流向地表的自我封闭,从而改变结构中的偏差应力。这些反应生成的常见矿物包括无水石膏(CaSO4)、硫化物和二氧化硅(石英),所有这些在包括洪加在内的火山喷出物中都有记录。我们在此开发了一个一阶数值模型,该模型量化了这些气体向地表的自由排放是如何被这些密封反应逐渐阻塞,从而导致内部气体压力增加的。当密封下的压缩岩浆气体的传输压力增加到大于岩浆压力加上密封岩石的抗拉强度时,密封就会发生水力破裂。这引发了压缩气体的爆炸性释放,其高能放电逐渐形成并扩大了火山口。与此同时,爆炸在火山核心断裂的多孔岩体中产生更大的压力梯度,从而自我反哺。火山口的挖掘可能会与高位侵入体相交,并产生在喷发后观察到的浮石筏。在洪加,火山喷发挖掘出了一个深 850 米、直径 2-3 千米的陡壁火山口。可以假定该火山口近似于断裂多孔岩石(喷发的控制体积)的体积,喷发开采了其中的滞留气体,直到周围的气体压力耗尽为止。我们的数值模型显示,计算出的被困压缩气体势能与独立观测到的喷发规模相吻合。此后的传感器数据显示,气泡耀斑在喷发后至少持续了 6 个月,这表明新火山口周围岩石的储气库仍在继续消耗。本文为洪加气候喷发建立的基于系统的气体驱动模型也适用于1991年皮纳图博(菲律宾)等亚高原弧形火山的普林尼型喷发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
13.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
19.7 weeks
期刊介绍: An international research journal with focus on volcanic and geothermal processes and their impact on the environment and society. Submission of papers covering the following aspects of volcanology and geothermal research are encouraged: (1) Geological aspects of volcanic systems: volcano stratigraphy, structure and tectonic influence; eruptive history; evolution of volcanic landforms; eruption style and progress; dispersal patterns of lava and ash; analysis of real-time eruption observations. (2) Geochemical and petrological aspects of volcanic rocks: magma genesis and evolution; crystallization; volatile compositions, solubility, and degassing; volcanic petrography and textural analysis. (3) Hydrology, geochemistry and measurement of volcanic and hydrothermal fluids: volcanic gas emissions; fumaroles and springs; crater lakes; hydrothermal mineralization. (4) Geophysical aspects of volcanic systems: physical properties of volcanic rocks and magmas; heat flow studies; volcano seismology, geodesy and remote sensing. (5) Computational modeling and experimental simulation of magmatic and hydrothermal processes: eruption dynamics; magma transport and storage; plume dynamics and ash dispersal; lava flow dynamics; hydrothermal fluid flow; thermodynamics of aqueous fluids and melts. (6) Volcano hazard and risk research: hazard zonation methodology, development of forecasting tools; assessment techniques for vulnerability and impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信