Resultados de procedimientos híbridos de cirugía coronaria e implante transcatéter de la válvula aórtica concomitante

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY
Carlos Domínguez-Massa , Tomás Heredia-Cambra , Juan Bautista Martínez-León
{"title":"Resultados de procedimientos híbridos de cirugía coronaria e implante transcatéter de la válvula aórtica concomitante","authors":"Carlos Domínguez-Massa ,&nbsp;Tomás Heredia-Cambra ,&nbsp;Juan Bautista Martínez-León","doi":"10.1016/j.circv.2024.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>Coronary artery disease may be present in 40-75% of patients with severe aortic stenosis who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim is to evaluate the safety of a hybrid procedure in which coronary artery bypass grafting and TAVI are performed simultaneously with respect to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic prosthesis implantation with cardiopulmonary bypass.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent TAVI concomitantly with coronary revascularization off-pump were analyzed, consecutively, from when this procedure began in 2017 until the last patient operated on in 2020 (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->19), compared with the cases operated on for biological aortic prosthesis implantation, with cardiopulmonary bypass, concomitantly with surgical coronary revascularization, in the last year 2021 (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->24). Unified Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) parameters were used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Regarding the preoperative variables, statistically significant differences were found in mean age (77,89<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5,91 years in the TAVI group compared to 70,33<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5,48 years in the conventional surgery group; p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), and in the rate of vascular disease (63,2% vs. 25%; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0,012). No differences were found in the number of coronary anastomoses performed between the two groups. In the postoperative results, only statistically significant differences were found in the rate of paravalvular regurgitation (47,4% vs. 8,3%; p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>TAVI concomitantly with coronary artery bypass grafting has been shown to be safe with no statistically significant differences in the primary endpoints of mortality, stroke rate, and reoperations, as well as in the combined endpoints of technical success, device success, early safety, and of clinical efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":42671,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Cardiovascular","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 195-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Cardiovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134009624000433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

Coronary artery disease may be present in 40-75% of patients with severe aortic stenosis who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim is to evaluate the safety of a hybrid procedure in which coronary artery bypass grafting and TAVI are performed simultaneously with respect to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic prosthesis implantation with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Methods

Patients who underwent TAVI concomitantly with coronary revascularization off-pump were analyzed, consecutively, from when this procedure began in 2017 until the last patient operated on in 2020 (n = 19), compared with the cases operated on for biological aortic prosthesis implantation, with cardiopulmonary bypass, concomitantly with surgical coronary revascularization, in the last year 2021 (n = 24). Unified Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) parameters were used.

Results

Regarding the preoperative variables, statistically significant differences were found in mean age (77,89 ± 5,91 years in the TAVI group compared to 70,33 ± 5,48 years in the conventional surgery group; p < 0.001), and in the rate of vascular disease (63,2% vs. 25%; p = 0,012). No differences were found in the number of coronary anastomoses performed between the two groups. In the postoperative results, only statistically significant differences were found in the rate of paravalvular regurgitation (47,4% vs. 8,3%; p = 0.005).

Conclusion

TAVI concomitantly with coronary artery bypass grafting has been shown to be safe with no statistically significant differences in the primary endpoints of mortality, stroke rate, and reoperations, as well as in the combined endpoints of technical success, device success, early safety, and of clinical efficacy.
冠状动脉手术和同时经导管主动脉瓣植入术的混合手术结果
40-75%的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者行经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)时可能存在冠状动脉疾病。目的是评估冠状动脉旁路移植术和TAVI同时进行的混合手术的安全性,相对于传统的冠状动脉旁路移植术和主动脉假体植入体外循环。方法回顾性分析2017年TAVI合并非体外循环冠状动脉重建术开始至2020年最后一次手术的患者(n = 19),与2021年生物主动脉假体植入术合并体外循环合并手术冠状动脉重建术患者(n = 24)进行对比。采用统一阀门学术研究联盟3 (VARC-3)参数。结果术前变量方面,TAVI组患者平均年龄(77,89±5,91岁)与常规手术组患者平均年龄(70,33±5,48岁)比较,差异有统计学意义;p & lt;0.001),血管疾病发生率(63.2% vs. 25%;p = 0.012)。两组间冠状动脉吻合术数目无差异。在术后结果中,只有瓣旁反流率有统计学意义(47.4% vs 8.3%;p = 0.005)。结论tavi联合冠状动脉旁路移植术是安全的,在死亡率、卒中发生率、再手术等主要终点以及技术成功、器械成功、早期安全性、临床疗效等综合终点均无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
66.70%
发文量
109
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信