Landon D. Hamilton PhD, Scott Binns RN, MS, Kim McFann PhD, Nikiah Nudell MS, Julie A. Dunn MD
{"title":"A Direct Assessment of Noninvasive Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit","authors":"Landon D. Hamilton PhD, Scott Binns RN, MS, Kim McFann PhD, Nikiah Nudell MS, Julie A. Dunn MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitoring has the potential to improve patient treatment in the hospital setting. Such noninvasive devices can be applied earlier in the treatment process to empower nurses and clinicians to react more quickly to patient deterioration with the added benefit of eliminating the risks associated with invasive monitoring. However, emerging technologies must be capable of reproducing current clinical measures for medical decision making.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study aimed to determine the usability and willingness of nurses to implement a noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitoring device. The secondary aim directly compared the systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure values recorded by the device (VitalStream; CareTaker Medical LLC, Charlottesville, VA) with the “gold standard” brachial cuff and arterial line measures recorded in the emergency department and intensive care unit settings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>VitalStream was similarly received by nurses in the emergency department and intensive care setting, but ultimately had greater promotion from emergency nurses. Despite some statistical similarity between measurement methodologies, all direct comparisons were found to not meet the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation 2008 and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation / European Society of Hypertension / International Organization for Standardization 2019 consensus statement criteria for acceptable blood pressure measure differences between the VitalStream and “gold standard” clinical measures. In all instances, the standard deviation of the Bland-Altman bias exceeded 8 mm Hg with less than 85% of paired differences falling within 10 mm Hg of the “gold standard.”</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Taken together, the tested device requires additional postprocessing for medical decision making in trauma or emergent care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099176724000783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitoring has the potential to improve patient treatment in the hospital setting. Such noninvasive devices can be applied earlier in the treatment process to empower nurses and clinicians to react more quickly to patient deterioration with the added benefit of eliminating the risks associated with invasive monitoring. However, emerging technologies must be capable of reproducing current clinical measures for medical decision making.
Methods
This study aimed to determine the usability and willingness of nurses to implement a noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitoring device. The secondary aim directly compared the systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure values recorded by the device (VitalStream; CareTaker Medical LLC, Charlottesville, VA) with the “gold standard” brachial cuff and arterial line measures recorded in the emergency department and intensive care unit settings.
Results
VitalStream was similarly received by nurses in the emergency department and intensive care setting, but ultimately had greater promotion from emergency nurses. Despite some statistical similarity between measurement methodologies, all direct comparisons were found to not meet the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation 2008 and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation / European Society of Hypertension / International Organization for Standardization 2019 consensus statement criteria for acceptable blood pressure measure differences between the VitalStream and “gold standard” clinical measures. In all instances, the standard deviation of the Bland-Altman bias exceeded 8 mm Hg with less than 85% of paired differences falling within 10 mm Hg of the “gold standard.”
Discussion
Taken together, the tested device requires additional postprocessing for medical decision making in trauma or emergent care.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice.
The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics.
The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
