Evaluating the satisfaction of hybrid learning among undergraduate health science students

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Ganesh Sritheran Paneerselvam, Li Yan Lim, S. Beshir, M. Farrukh, H. Zulkifly, Long Chiau Ming, Chrismawan Ardianto, Andi Hermansyah, Wen-Han Chooi
{"title":"Evaluating the satisfaction of hybrid learning among undergraduate health science students","authors":"Ganesh Sritheran Paneerselvam, Li Yan Lim, S. Beshir, M. Farrukh, H. Zulkifly, Long Chiau Ming, Chrismawan Ardianto, Andi Hermansyah, Wen-Han Chooi","doi":"10.46542/pe.2024.242.109114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hybrid learning combines traditional face-to-face instruction with online or digital learning components and has gained significant popularity in recent years.\nObjective: This study aimed to assess the satisfaction of hybrid learning among undergraduate health science students and identify the factors associated with the satisfaction level, providing further insights into improvements in hybrid learning adoption to make effective use of the learning approach.\nMethods: An online survey was distributed to the undergraduate health science students at Taylor’s University in Malaysia. Students’ satisfaction and the associated factors were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale using Pearson Chi-square and logistic regression analysis test where p-value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.\nResults: More than half of the students (66.7%) in this study expressed positive satisfaction towards hybrid learning. Internet connection was determined as one of the students' satisfaction-related factors (p=xx). Multivariate binary logistics regression demonstrated that course structure, perceived ease of use, student-instructor interaction and students’ attitude toward hybrid learning had a statistically significant impact on students’ satisfaction with the hybrid learning approach.\nConclusion: Students' satisfaction is valuable input for institutions and instructors to enhance the quality of hybrid learning in the future to optimise students' learning experience.","PeriodicalId":19944,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2024.242.109114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hybrid learning combines traditional face-to-face instruction with online or digital learning components and has gained significant popularity in recent years. Objective: This study aimed to assess the satisfaction of hybrid learning among undergraduate health science students and identify the factors associated with the satisfaction level, providing further insights into improvements in hybrid learning adoption to make effective use of the learning approach. Methods: An online survey was distributed to the undergraduate health science students at Taylor’s University in Malaysia. Students’ satisfaction and the associated factors were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale using Pearson Chi-square and logistic regression analysis test where p-value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: More than half of the students (66.7%) in this study expressed positive satisfaction towards hybrid learning. Internet connection was determined as one of the students' satisfaction-related factors (p=xx). Multivariate binary logistics regression demonstrated that course structure, perceived ease of use, student-instructor interaction and students’ attitude toward hybrid learning had a statistically significant impact on students’ satisfaction with the hybrid learning approach. Conclusion: Students' satisfaction is valuable input for institutions and instructors to enhance the quality of hybrid learning in the future to optimise students' learning experience.
评估健康科学本科生对混合学习的满意度
背景:混合式学习将传统的面对面教学与在线或数字化学习内容相结合,近年来大受欢迎:本研究旨在评估健康科学专业本科生对混合式学习的满意度,并确定与满意度相关的因素,为改进混合式学习提供进一步的见解,从而有效利用这种学习方法:方法:向马来西亚泰勒大学健康科学专业的本科生发放了一份在线调查问卷。学生的满意度和相关因素采用 5 点李克特量表进行评估,并使用皮尔逊卡方和逻辑回归分析测试,P 值小于 0.05 为具有统计学意义:超过半数的学生(66.7%)对混合式学习表示满意。互联网连接被认为是学生满意度的相关因素之一(p=xx)。多变量二元物流回归表明,课程结构、感知到的易用性、学生与教师的互动以及学生对混合式学习的态度对学生对混合式学习方法的满意度有显著的统计学影响:学生的满意度是院校和教师今后提高混合式学习质量、优化学生学习体验的重要依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy Education
Pharmacy Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Pharmacy Education journal provides a research, development and evaluation forum for communication between academic teachers, researchers and practitioners in professional and pharmacy education, with an emphasis on new and established teaching and learning methods, new curriculum and syllabus directions, educational outcomes, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and workforce development. It is a peer-reviewed online open access platform for the dissemination of new ideas in professional pharmacy education and workforce development. Pharmacy Education supports Open Access (OA): free, unrestricted online access to research outputs. Readers are able to access the Journal and individual published articles for free - there are no subscription fees or ''pay per view'' charges. Authors wishing to publish their work in Pharmacy Education do so without incurring any financial costs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信