{"title":"C.S. Lewis on Female Scholars: A Reply to John D. Rateliff","authors":"Jason Lepojärvi","doi":"10.3366/ink.2024.0217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In John D. Rateliff’s study ‘The Missing Women: J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lifelong Support for Women’s Higher Education’, Tolkien’s support of women is unfavourably contrasted with the supposedly dismissive attitude of C.S. Lewis. Rateliff offers three pieces of evidence in support of his argument that Lewis held a contemptuous attitude towards female research students in particular: a private letter by Lewis written in mock late-medieval English; Lewis’s comments about Damaris Tighe, the heroine in Charles Williams’s novel The Place of the Lion; and the character Jane Studdock in Lewis’s own novel That Hideous Strength. This paper argues that Rateliff’s evidence is not only limited but selective and misunderstood. What Lewis rebukes is academic complacency and vanity, not female researchers, many of whom Lewis respected and even befriended. The principle of biographical verification (grounding biographical speculations in biographical rather than imaginative literature) seriously complicates Rateliff’s argument.","PeriodicalId":37069,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inklings Studies","volume":"95 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inklings Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ink.2024.0217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In John D. Rateliff’s study ‘The Missing Women: J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lifelong Support for Women’s Higher Education’, Tolkien’s support of women is unfavourably contrasted with the supposedly dismissive attitude of C.S. Lewis. Rateliff offers three pieces of evidence in support of his argument that Lewis held a contemptuous attitude towards female research students in particular: a private letter by Lewis written in mock late-medieval English; Lewis’s comments about Damaris Tighe, the heroine in Charles Williams’s novel The Place of the Lion; and the character Jane Studdock in Lewis’s own novel That Hideous Strength. This paper argues that Rateliff’s evidence is not only limited but selective and misunderstood. What Lewis rebukes is academic complacency and vanity, not female researchers, many of whom Lewis respected and even befriended. The principle of biographical verification (grounding biographical speculations in biographical rather than imaginative literature) seriously complicates Rateliff’s argument.
约翰-D-拉特利夫(John D. Rateliff)的研究报告《缺失的女性》(The Missing Women:J.R.R.托尔金对女性高等教育的终生支持 "中,托尔金对女性的支持与 C.S. 刘易斯所谓的轻蔑态度形成了不利的对比。拉特利夫提供了三个证据来支持他的论点,即刘易斯尤其对女研究生持蔑视态度:刘易斯用模拟的中世纪晚期英语写的一封私人信件;刘易斯对查尔斯-威廉姆斯(Charles Williams)的小说《狮子之地》(The Place of the Lion)中的女主人公达玛丽斯-蒂格(Damaris Tighe)的评价;以及刘易斯自己的小说《可怕的力量》(That Hideous Strength)中的人物简-斯塔多克(Jane Studdock)。本文认为,拉特利夫的证据不仅有限,而且有选择性和误解。刘易斯斥责的是学术界的自满和虚荣,而不是女性研究者,刘易斯尊重甚至结交了许多女性研究者。传记验证原则(将传记推测建立在传记文学而非想象文学的基础上)使拉特利夫的论点严重复杂化。