Using verbal and social autopsy approaches to understand why neonates die in rural settings: a case study of a remote rural district in Uganda

Felix Kizito, R. M. Kananura, J. N. Ssanyu, Joseph Akuze, D. Amongin, P. Waiswa
{"title":"Using verbal and social autopsy approaches to understand why neonates die in rural settings: a case study of a remote rural district in Uganda","authors":"Felix Kizito, R. M. Kananura, J. N. Ssanyu, Joseph Akuze, D. Amongin, P. Waiswa","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2023-000682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neonatal mortality remains a formidable challenge in low-resource settings, such as Uganda, despite global health initiatives. This study employs a social and verbal autopsy approach to identify the causes, settings and health accessibility challenges surrounding neonatal deaths in the Luuka district from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019.We analysed data from 172 neonatal verbal and social autopsies (VASA) conducted over 3 years, as part of a maternal and neonatal demand and supply health system strengthening intervention. Cause-of-death coding was done by two independent medical officers using WHO-ICD-10 guidelines to ascertain the causes of death. VASA-coded data analysis of the causes of death was done in STATA V.14.0. In addition, 16 key informant interviews were conducted, including 2 community health workers,6 household members and 8 health workers, with qualitative data analysed through thematic content analysis.Among the 172 neonate deaths, 95.9% occurred in the early neonatal period (0–6 days) and 4.1% in the late neonatal period (7–27 days). The primary causes of death were birth asphyxia (42.4%), low birth weight/prematurity (18.6%), other perinatal causes (12.8%) and neonatal sepsis (9.3%). Delays in getting appropriate care at the facility (delay 3) and delays in seeking care (delay 1) (51.2% and 44.2%, respectively) were linked to newborn mortality. Qualitative insights underscored inadequate awareness of neonatal danger signs, deficient referral systems, drug shortages, reliance on unskilled traditional birth attendants and insufficient neonatal care facilities as significant contributors.Addressing delays in both home-based care (delay 1) and timely access to appropriate care in healthcare facilities (delays 2 and 3) is pivotal in mitigating neonatal mortality. Comprehensive interventions targeting improved access to maternal services and enhanced quality of care in health facilities are imperative for advancing newborn survival in rural settings.","PeriodicalId":117861,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2023-000682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neonatal mortality remains a formidable challenge in low-resource settings, such as Uganda, despite global health initiatives. This study employs a social and verbal autopsy approach to identify the causes, settings and health accessibility challenges surrounding neonatal deaths in the Luuka district from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019.We analysed data from 172 neonatal verbal and social autopsies (VASA) conducted over 3 years, as part of a maternal and neonatal demand and supply health system strengthening intervention. Cause-of-death coding was done by two independent medical officers using WHO-ICD-10 guidelines to ascertain the causes of death. VASA-coded data analysis of the causes of death was done in STATA V.14.0. In addition, 16 key informant interviews were conducted, including 2 community health workers,6 household members and 8 health workers, with qualitative data analysed through thematic content analysis.Among the 172 neonate deaths, 95.9% occurred in the early neonatal period (0–6 days) and 4.1% in the late neonatal period (7–27 days). The primary causes of death were birth asphyxia (42.4%), low birth weight/prematurity (18.6%), other perinatal causes (12.8%) and neonatal sepsis (9.3%). Delays in getting appropriate care at the facility (delay 3) and delays in seeking care (delay 1) (51.2% and 44.2%, respectively) were linked to newborn mortality. Qualitative insights underscored inadequate awareness of neonatal danger signs, deficient referral systems, drug shortages, reliance on unskilled traditional birth attendants and insufficient neonatal care facilities as significant contributors.Addressing delays in both home-based care (delay 1) and timely access to appropriate care in healthcare facilities (delays 2 and 3) is pivotal in mitigating neonatal mortality. Comprehensive interventions targeting improved access to maternal services and enhanced quality of care in health facilities are imperative for advancing newborn survival in rural settings.
利用语言和社会解剖方法了解农村地区新生儿死亡的原因:乌干达偏远农村地区的案例研究
尽管采取了全球卫生举措,但新生儿死亡仍是乌干达等资源匮乏地区面临的一项严峻挑战。本研究采用了社会和口头尸检方法,以确定2017年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间卢卡地区新生儿死亡的原因、环境和医疗无障碍挑战。我们分析了3年中进行的172例新生儿口头和社会尸检(VASA)的数据,这是孕产妇和新生儿供需卫生系统强化干预措施的一部分。死因编码由两名独立的医务人员根据世界卫生组织-国际疾病分类-10(WHO-ICD-10)指南完成,以确定死亡原因。使用 STATA V.14.0 对死因进行了 VASA 编码数据分析。此外,还进行了 16 次关键信息提供者访谈,包括 2 名社区卫生工作者、6 名家庭成员和 8 名卫生工作者,并通过主题内容分析对定性数据进行了分析。在 172 例新生儿死亡病例中,95.9% 发生在新生儿早期(0-6 天),4.1% 发生在新生儿晚期(7-27 天)。死亡的主要原因是出生窒息(42.4%)、低出生体重/早产(18.6%)、其他围产期原因(12.8%)和新生儿败血症(9.3%)。延迟在医疗机构获得适当护理(延迟 3)和延迟寻求护理(延迟 1)(分别占 51.2% 和 44.2%)与新生儿死亡有关。定性分析强调,对新生儿危险征兆认识不足、转诊系统不完善、药物短缺、依赖不熟练的传统助产士以及新生儿护理设施不足是造成新生儿死亡的重要原因。要提高农村地区新生儿的存活率,就必须采取综合干预措施,改善孕产妇服务的可及性,提高医疗机构的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信