Comparison of Refractive Index Matching Techniques and PLIF40 Measurements in Annular Flow

Y. Rivera, Dorian Bascou, David Blanco, Lucas Álvarez-Piñeiro, C. Berna, J. Muñoz-Cobo, Alberto Escrivá
{"title":"Comparison of Refractive Index Matching Techniques and PLIF40 Measurements in Annular Flow","authors":"Y. Rivera, Dorian Bascou, David Blanco, Lucas Álvarez-Piñeiro, C. Berna, J. Muñoz-Cobo, Alberto Escrivá","doi":"10.3390/s24072317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates non-invasive techniques for annular two-phase flow analysis, focusing on liquid film characterization to understand the interfacial phenomena that are crucial for heat and mass transfer. Limited methods allow the study of the temporal and spatial evolution of liquid film, such as Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence (PLIF). However, this method possesses optical challenges, leading to the need for improved techniques to mitigate refraction and reflection, such as Refractive Index Matching (RIM). This study utilizes an experimental annular flow facility to analyze both RIM and non-RIM PLIF over a range of liquid Reynolds numbers from 4200 to 10,400. Three configurations—PLIF RIM90, PLIF RIM40, and PLIF nRIM40—are compared from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives. In the quantitative analysis, key variables of the liquid film are measured, namely mean film thickness, disturbance wave height, and frequency. Variations in the analyzed variables indicate minor deviations, which are not likely to be caused by the technique used. However, all three methodologies exhibited errors that are estimated to be within a maximum of 10%, with a mean value of approximately 8%.","PeriodicalId":221960,"journal":{"name":"Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/s24072317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates non-invasive techniques for annular two-phase flow analysis, focusing on liquid film characterization to understand the interfacial phenomena that are crucial for heat and mass transfer. Limited methods allow the study of the temporal and spatial evolution of liquid film, such as Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence (PLIF). However, this method possesses optical challenges, leading to the need for improved techniques to mitigate refraction and reflection, such as Refractive Index Matching (RIM). This study utilizes an experimental annular flow facility to analyze both RIM and non-RIM PLIF over a range of liquid Reynolds numbers from 4200 to 10,400. Three configurations—PLIF RIM90, PLIF RIM40, and PLIF nRIM40—are compared from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives. In the quantitative analysis, key variables of the liquid film are measured, namely mean film thickness, disturbance wave height, and frequency. Variations in the analyzed variables indicate minor deviations, which are not likely to be caused by the technique used. However, all three methodologies exhibited errors that are estimated to be within a maximum of 10%, with a mean value of approximately 8%.
环流中折射率匹配技术与 PLIF40 测量值的比较
本文研究了用于环形两相流分析的非侵入式技术,重点是液膜表征,以了解对传热和传质至关重要的界面现象。研究液膜时空演变的方法有限,如平面激光诱导荧光(PLIF)。然而,这种方法在光学方面存在挑战,因此需要改进技术来减少折射和反射,如折射率匹配(RIM)。本研究利用环形流动实验设备,在 4200 到 10400 的液体雷诺数范围内分析了 RIM 和非 RIM PLIF。从定性和定量的角度对三种配置--PLIF RIM90、PLIF RIM40 和 PLIF nRIM40 进行了比较。在定量分析中,测量了液膜的关键变量,即平均膜厚、扰动波高度和频率。分析变量的变化表明存在微小的偏差,这些偏差不太可能是由所使用的技术造成的。不过,所有三种方法的误差估计最大在 10%以内,平均值约为 8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信