Explainable Machine Learning Model to Preoperatively Predict Postoperative Complications in Inpatients With Cancer Undergoing Major Operations.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Matthew C Hernandez, Chen Chen, Andrew Nguyen, Kevin Choong, Cameron Carlin, Rebecca A. Nelson, Lorenzo A. Rossi, Naini S. Seth, Kathy McNeese, Bertram Yuh, Z. Eftekhari, Lily L. Lai
{"title":"Explainable Machine Learning Model to Preoperatively Predict Postoperative Complications in Inpatients With Cancer Undergoing Major Operations.","authors":"Matthew C Hernandez, Chen Chen, Andrew Nguyen, Kevin Choong, Cameron Carlin, Rebecca A. Nelson, Lorenzo A. Rossi, Naini S. Seth, Kathy McNeese, Bertram Yuh, Z. Eftekhari, Lily L. Lai","doi":"10.1200/cci.23.00247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nPreoperative prediction of postoperative complications (PCs) in inpatients with cancer is challenging. We developed an explainable machine learning (ML) model to predict PCs in a heterogenous population of inpatients with cancer undergoing same-hospitalization major operations.\n\n\nMETHODS\nConsecutive inpatients who underwent same-hospitalization operations from December 2017 to June 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The ML model was developed and tested using electronic health record (EHR) data to predict 30-day PCs for patients with Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher (CD 3+) per the CD classification system. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC), and calibration plots. Model explanation was performed using the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method at cohort and individual operation levels.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 988 operations in 827 inpatients were included. The ML model was trained using 788 operations and tested using a holdout set of 200 operations. The CD 3+ complication rates were 28.6% and 27.5% in the training and holdout test sets, respectively. Training and holdout test sets' model performance in predicting CD 3+ complications yielded an AUROC of 0.77 and 0.73 and an AUPRC of 0.56 and 0.52, respectively. Calibration plots demonstrated good reliability. The SHAP method identified features and the contributions of the features to the risk of PCs.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nWe trained and tested an explainable ML model to predict the risk of developing PCs in patients with cancer. Using patient-specific EHR data, the ML model accurately discriminated the risk of developing CD 3+ complications and displayed top features at the individual operation and cohort level.","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/cci.23.00247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Preoperative prediction of postoperative complications (PCs) in inpatients with cancer is challenging. We developed an explainable machine learning (ML) model to predict PCs in a heterogenous population of inpatients with cancer undergoing same-hospitalization major operations. METHODS Consecutive inpatients who underwent same-hospitalization operations from December 2017 to June 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The ML model was developed and tested using electronic health record (EHR) data to predict 30-day PCs for patients with Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher (CD 3+) per the CD classification system. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC), and calibration plots. Model explanation was performed using the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method at cohort and individual operation levels. RESULTS A total of 988 operations in 827 inpatients were included. The ML model was trained using 788 operations and tested using a holdout set of 200 operations. The CD 3+ complication rates were 28.6% and 27.5% in the training and holdout test sets, respectively. Training and holdout test sets' model performance in predicting CD 3+ complications yielded an AUROC of 0.77 and 0.73 and an AUPRC of 0.56 and 0.52, respectively. Calibration plots demonstrated good reliability. The SHAP method identified features and the contributions of the features to the risk of PCs. CONCLUSION We trained and tested an explainable ML model to predict the risk of developing PCs in patients with cancer. Using patient-specific EHR data, the ML model accurately discriminated the risk of developing CD 3+ complications and displayed top features at the individual operation and cohort level.
可解释的机器学习模型,用于术前预测接受大手术的癌症住院患者的术后并发症。
目的对癌症患者的术后并发症(PCs)进行术前预测是一项挑战。我们开发了一种可解释的机器学习(ML)模型,用于预测接受同院大手术的异质癌症住院患者的PC。方法对2017年12月至2021年6月期间在一家机构接受同院手术的连续住院患者进行了回顾性回顾。使用电子健康记录(EHR)数据开发并测试了ML模型,以预测根据CD分类系统Clavien-Dindo 3级或以上(CD 3+)患者的30天PCs。使用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、精确召回曲线下面积(AUPRC)和校准图评估模型性能。使用沙普利加法解释(SHAP)方法在队列和单个手术水平上对模型进行了解释。使用 788 例手术对 ML 模型进行了训练,并使用 200 例手术的保留集进行了测试。在训练集和暂缓测试集中,CD 3+ 并发症发生率分别为 28.6% 和 27.5%。训练集和保留测试集的模型在预测 CD 3+ 并发症方面的表现分别为 AUROC 0.77 和 0.73,AUPRC 0.56 和 0.52。校准图显示了良好的可靠性。结论我们训练并测试了一个可解释的 ML 模型,用于预测癌症患者罹患多发性硬化症的风险。通过使用患者特定的电子病历数据,ML 模型准确区分了 CD 3+ 并发症的发病风险,并显示了单个手术和队列水平的首要特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信