{"title":"Surgical approaches of shoulder calcific tendonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.03.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Calcific tendonitis is a painful shoulder disorder characterized by calcium deposits (CDs) in the rotator cuff tendon. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the most efficient surgical procedure for calcific tendonitis. This includes the comparison between the three main surgical techniques: CD removal, CD removal with subacromial decompression (SAD) and CD removal with tendon repair with respect to functional outcomes and pain control scores.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched in February 2023. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed, and participants were patients diagnosed with calcific tendonitis of one or more rotator cuff tendon based on diagnostic imaging who underwent shoulder calcific tendonitis surgery. Other shoulder pathology diagnoses were excluded. Meta-analyses were conducted for results that were sufficiently homogeneous in terms of statistical, clinical, and methodological characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine if effect sizes differed based on the patient’s position during the surgery, physiotherapy, and follow-up time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All surgical interventions resulted in significant improvements in shoulder function and pain control. There were no significant differences between CD removal vs. CD removal with SAD or CD removal vs. CD removal with tendon repair. However, there was a trend in favor of CD removal alone or CD removal with SAD approaches, as they provided better outcome scores than CD removal with tendon repair in terms of shoulder function and pain control.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>All surgical interventions provide substantial improvement in shoulder functions and pain control scores with no significant difference between these surgical techniques.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 353-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000580/pdfft?md5=161d7fe276aacb8dd597b06ab91278a8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666639124000580-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Calcific tendonitis is a painful shoulder disorder characterized by calcium deposits (CDs) in the rotator cuff tendon. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the most efficient surgical procedure for calcific tendonitis. This includes the comparison between the three main surgical techniques: CD removal, CD removal with subacromial decompression (SAD) and CD removal with tendon repair with respect to functional outcomes and pain control scores.
Methods
Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched in February 2023. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were peer-reviewed, and participants were patients diagnosed with calcific tendonitis of one or more rotator cuff tendon based on diagnostic imaging who underwent shoulder calcific tendonitis surgery. Other shoulder pathology diagnoses were excluded. Meta-analyses were conducted for results that were sufficiently homogeneous in terms of statistical, clinical, and methodological characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine if effect sizes differed based on the patient’s position during the surgery, physiotherapy, and follow-up time.
Results
All surgical interventions resulted in significant improvements in shoulder function and pain control. There were no significant differences between CD removal vs. CD removal with SAD or CD removal vs. CD removal with tendon repair. However, there was a trend in favor of CD removal alone or CD removal with SAD approaches, as they provided better outcome scores than CD removal with tendon repair in terms of shoulder function and pain control.
Conclusions
All surgical interventions provide substantial improvement in shoulder functions and pain control scores with no significant difference between these surgical techniques.
背景钙化性肌腱炎是一种肩部疼痛性疾病,其特征是肩袖肌腱中的钙沉积(CD)。本系统综述和荟萃分析研究了治疗钙化性肌腱炎最有效的手术方法。其中包括三种主要手术技术之间的比较:方法于 2023 年 2 月检索了四个电子数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials)。经同行评审的研究符合纳入条件,参与者为根据影像学诊断确诊为肩袖肌腱钙化性炎症并接受肩部钙化性肌腱炎手术的患者。其他肩部病理诊断除外。对于在统计、临床和方法学特征方面具有充分同质性的结果进行了 Meta 分析。进行了分组分析,以确定效果大小是否因患者在手术中的体位、物理治疗和随访时间而有所不同。结果所有手术干预都显著改善了肩关节功能和疼痛控制。CD移除术与CD移除加SAD术、CD移除术与CD移除加肌腱修复术之间没有明显差异。结论所有手术干预都能显著改善肩关节功能和疼痛控制评分,且这些手术技术之间无明显差异。