Radiographic Fusion Outcomes for Trinity Cellular Based Allograft versus Local Bone in Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion

Aatif Sayeed, Ali Jawad, Philip Zakko, Maximillian Lee, Daniel K Park
{"title":"Radiographic Fusion Outcomes for Trinity Cellular Based Allograft versus Local Bone in Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion","authors":"Aatif Sayeed, Ali Jawad, Philip Zakko, Maximillian Lee, Daniel K Park","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cellular-based autograft (CBA) is being used in posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis as a fusion supplementation alternative. Objective: To assess radiographic fusion in patients undergoing posterolateral lumbar fusion with unilateral Trinity CBA compared with contralateral local bone autograft as an internal control. Methods: A single surgeon's practice database was interrogated for consecutive patients undergoing primary posterolateral lumbar fusion with Trinity from 2018 to 2021. Patients had Trinity applied unilaterally, with local bone autograft applied contralaterally. Fusion was assessed postoperatively by using CT after 9 months. Demographics and patient-reported outcome measures were collected preoperatively and up to 12 months postoperatively. Results: Thirty-nine patients were included. There were 81 attempted fusion levels. Overall fusion rate, defined as bony bridging on at least one side of a given level for all levels fused, was 85.2% of patients. No statistically significant difference was observed in fusion rates between CBA versus local bone (79.0% versus 76.54% of levels attempted, respectively, P = 0.3527). Oswestry Disability Index improved by 3 months (P = 0.0152) and was maintained. Two patients required revision for symptomatic nonunion. Conclusions: Similar radiographic fusion rates were achieved with Trinity and local bone. Trinity is a viable alternative to local bone in posterolateral lumbar fusion.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"288 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cellular-based autograft (CBA) is being used in posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis as a fusion supplementation alternative. Objective: To assess radiographic fusion in patients undergoing posterolateral lumbar fusion with unilateral Trinity CBA compared with contralateral local bone autograft as an internal control. Methods: A single surgeon's practice database was interrogated for consecutive patients undergoing primary posterolateral lumbar fusion with Trinity from 2018 to 2021. Patients had Trinity applied unilaterally, with local bone autograft applied contralaterally. Fusion was assessed postoperatively by using CT after 9 months. Demographics and patient-reported outcome measures were collected preoperatively and up to 12 months postoperatively. Results: Thirty-nine patients were included. There were 81 attempted fusion levels. Overall fusion rate, defined as bony bridging on at least one side of a given level for all levels fused, was 85.2% of patients. No statistically significant difference was observed in fusion rates between CBA versus local bone (79.0% versus 76.54% of levels attempted, respectively, P = 0.3527). Oswestry Disability Index improved by 3 months (P = 0.0152) and was maintained. Two patients required revision for symptomatic nonunion. Conclusions: Similar radiographic fusion rates were achieved with Trinity and local bone. Trinity is a viable alternative to local bone in posterolateral lumbar fusion.
腰椎后外侧融合术中三一细胞基同种异体移植与本地骨的放射学融合结果
简介:细胞自体移植物(CBA)正被用于后外侧腰椎关节置换术,作为融合术的补充替代方案。目的评估使用单侧三位一体 CBA 与对侧局部自体骨移植作为内部对照的腰椎后外侧融合术患者的放射学融合情况。方法:对一名外科医生的实践数据库进行了查询,以了解 2018 年至 2021 年期间接受 Trinity 初级后外侧腰椎融合术的连续患者的情况。患者单侧应用 Trinity,对侧应用局部自体骨移植。术后 9 个月后使用 CT 对融合情况进行评估。术前和术后 12 个月内收集了人口统计学资料和患者报告的结果指标。结果:共纳入 39 名患者。共有 81 例尝试融合。总融合率为85.2%,即所有融合水平的至少一侧出现骨性桥接。CBA与局部骨的融合率差异无统计学意义(分别为79.0%和76.54%,P = 0.3527)。3 个月后,Oswestry 失能指数有所改善(P = 0.0152)并保持不变。两名患者因症状性骨折需要进行翻修。结论:使用 Trinity 和局部骨质可获得相似的放射学融合率。在腰椎后外侧融合术中,Trinity是局部骨的可行替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信