{"title":"The Gospel of the Ebionites and the Synoptic Problem","authors":"Michael Kok","doi":"10.1353/cbq.2024.a924367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: David B. Sloan and James R. Edwards have revived the antique hypothesis that there was a single Gospel according to the Hebrews underlying the diverse patristic testimonies about it and that it was a significant source behind the Synoptic tradition. Specifically, Sloan and Edwards equate this reconstructed text with either Q or L, respectively, two hypothetical sources in B. H. Streeter’s classic solution to the Synoptic Problem. In this article, I defend the common scholarly view that the text known to Epiphanius, which modern scholars entitle as the Gospel of the Ebionites to distinguish it from the Gospel according to the Hebrews , was a Greek text that, at points, harmonizes passages from the Synoptics. I will focus on this Gospel’s baptism narrative to demonstrate that it replicates Matthean and Lucan redactional elements, thus making it unlikely to be the source of the Synoptic double tradition or the Lucan Sondergut .","PeriodicalId":424111,"journal":{"name":"The Catholic Biblical Quarterly","volume":"434 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Catholic Biblical Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cbq.2024.a924367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: David B. Sloan and James R. Edwards have revived the antique hypothesis that there was a single Gospel according to the Hebrews underlying the diverse patristic testimonies about it and that it was a significant source behind the Synoptic tradition. Specifically, Sloan and Edwards equate this reconstructed text with either Q or L, respectively, two hypothetical sources in B. H. Streeter’s classic solution to the Synoptic Problem. In this article, I defend the common scholarly view that the text known to Epiphanius, which modern scholars entitle as the Gospel of the Ebionites to distinguish it from the Gospel according to the Hebrews , was a Greek text that, at points, harmonizes passages from the Synoptics. I will focus on this Gospel’s baptism narrative to demonstrate that it replicates Matthean and Lucan redactional elements, thus making it unlikely to be the source of the Synoptic double tradition or the Lucan Sondergut .
摘要:大卫-B-斯隆(David B. Sloan)和詹姆斯-R-爱德华兹(James R. Edwards)重新提出了一个古老的假设,即在教父们关于《希伯来人福音书》的不同证词背后,存在着一个单一的《希伯来人福音书》,它是对观传统背后的一个重要来源。具体而言,斯隆和爱德华兹分别将这一重建的文本等同于 Q 或 L,即 B. H. 斯特里特(B. H. Streeter)对 "对观福音问题 "的经典解决方案中的两个假设来源。在本文中,我将为学者们的共同观点辩护,即埃皮法尼乌斯所知的文本(现代学者称其为《埃比奥尼特人的福音》,以区别于《希伯来人的福音》)是一种希腊文文本,在某些地方与对观福音中的段落相协调。我将重点讨论这本福音书的洗礼叙事,以证明它复制了马太福音和路加福音的节录元素,因此不太可能是对观福音双重传统或路加福音 Sondergut 的来源。