The Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation in Meniscus Repair Results in a Lower Failure Rate than in the Control Group: A Systematic Review From Meta-analysis

Q3 Medicine
{"title":"The Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation in Meniscus Repair Results in a Lower Failure Rate than in the Control Group: A Systematic Review From Meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an augmentation in meniscus repair.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline (via EBSCO), ProQuest, and ScienceDirect from January to February 2023 was conducted using the terms “meniscus repair,” “PRP,” and “meniscus tear.” Meta-analyses that investigated the rate of failure after meniscus repair were included. Studies before 2003, not in English, associated procedures during surgery, and animal studies were excluded. The included studies underwent quality appraisal and risk of bias assessment. Data were extracted from each study‘s text, figures, tables, and associated supplementary files and then analyzed qualitatively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The failure rate is lower in the PRP augmentation group compared with the group without augmentation, with a mean difference of 0.42, 0.50, and 0.43. Visual analog scale score was also found to be significantly lower in the treatment group, with a mean difference of 0.40, 0.76, and 6.69. However, only mean differences in Lysholm score in one of the included studies were found significant regarding functional outcomes, which can be found in the Xie et al. study with a mean difference of 3.06.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this study, we found that meniscal repairs augmented with PRP have a lower failure rate.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level IV, systematic review of Level III-IV studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X2400052X/pdfft?md5=570f10ced767650c96fef75f8cb3d9e9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X2400052X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X2400052X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an augmentation in meniscus repair.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline (via EBSCO), ProQuest, and ScienceDirect from January to February 2023 was conducted using the terms “meniscus repair,” “PRP,” and “meniscus tear.” Meta-analyses that investigated the rate of failure after meniscus repair were included. Studies before 2003, not in English, associated procedures during surgery, and animal studies were excluded. The included studies underwent quality appraisal and risk of bias assessment. Data were extracted from each study‘s text, figures, tables, and associated supplementary files and then analyzed qualitatively.

Results

The failure rate is lower in the PRP augmentation group compared with the group without augmentation, with a mean difference of 0.42, 0.50, and 0.43. Visual analog scale score was also found to be significantly lower in the treatment group, with a mean difference of 0.40, 0.76, and 6.69. However, only mean differences in Lysholm score in one of the included studies were found significant regarding functional outcomes, which can be found in the Xie et al. study with a mean difference of 3.06.

Conclusions

In this study, we found that meniscal repairs augmented with PRP have a lower failure rate.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level III-IV studies.

富血小板血浆扩增术在半月板修复中的疗效:荟萃分析的系统性综述
目的 研究富血小板血浆(PRP)作为半月板修复术的增强剂的疗效。方法 使用 "半月板修复术"、"PRP "和 "半月板撕裂 "等术语对 2023 年 1 月至 2 月期间的 PubMed、Medline(通过 EBSCO)、ProQuest 和 ScienceDirect 进行了全面检索。研究半月板修复术后失败率的 Meta 分析也包括在内。2003年之前的研究、非英语研究、手术过程中的相关程序以及动物研究均被排除在外。对纳入的研究进行了质量评估和偏倚风险评估。从每项研究的正文、图、表和相关补充文件中提取数据,然后进行定性分析。结果PRP增强组的失败率低于未增强组,平均差异为0.42、0.50和0.43。治疗组的视觉模拟评分也明显降低,平均差异为 0.40、0.76 和 6.69。结论在本研究中,我们发现使用 PRP 增强半月板修复术的失败率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信