Juggling Academic Practice and Care: Collaborative Autoethnography within a Basque University Research Group

Asunción Martínez-Arbelaiz, Aingeru Gutiérrez-Cabello, Estíbaliz Aberasturi-Apraiz, José Miguel Correa Gorospe
{"title":"Juggling Academic Practice and Care: Collaborative Autoethnography within a Basque University Research Group","authors":"Asunción Martínez-Arbelaiz, Aingeru Gutiérrez-Cabello, Estíbaliz Aberasturi-Apraiz, José Miguel Correa Gorospe","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many university scholars, including the authors of this article, acknowledge that they feel like they are riding an emotional roller coaster with academic success, as well as many project failures. Except for our PhD thesis, many of us complete our research tasks in relatively established research groups. However, little research has examined the potential these groups might have to mitigate feelings of academic isolation. To fill in this gap, we designed two methodological steps. First, we adopted the Woolfian metaphor of a room of our own, where we composed individual vignettes regarding our feelings of isolation. We read each other's texts and then, in a second step, moved to a “living room” to negotiate our emerging ideas, echoing a Collaborative Autoethnography. Two full professors and two early-career researchers reflected on and talked about their feelings of academic isolation, from their personal and professional standpoints. Despite the differences in job stability, the four participants acknowledged having felt isolated and abandoned. We argue that viewing research groups not as a community of practice, but a community of care is a more humane and desirable framework to model university research groups in these current times of exacerbating neoliberalism.","PeriodicalId":256338,"journal":{"name":"The Qualitative Report","volume":"41 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Qualitative Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many university scholars, including the authors of this article, acknowledge that they feel like they are riding an emotional roller coaster with academic success, as well as many project failures. Except for our PhD thesis, many of us complete our research tasks in relatively established research groups. However, little research has examined the potential these groups might have to mitigate feelings of academic isolation. To fill in this gap, we designed two methodological steps. First, we adopted the Woolfian metaphor of a room of our own, where we composed individual vignettes regarding our feelings of isolation. We read each other's texts and then, in a second step, moved to a “living room” to negotiate our emerging ideas, echoing a Collaborative Autoethnography. Two full professors and two early-career researchers reflected on and talked about their feelings of academic isolation, from their personal and professional standpoints. Despite the differences in job stability, the four participants acknowledged having felt isolated and abandoned. We argue that viewing research groups not as a community of practice, but a community of care is a more humane and desirable framework to model university research groups in these current times of exacerbating neoliberalism.
兼顾学术实践与关怀:巴斯克大学研究小组内的合作式自我民族志
包括本文作者在内的许多大学学者都承认,他们感觉自己的情绪就像坐过山车,既有学术上的成功,也有许多项目上的失败。除了博士论文,我们中的很多人都是在相对固定的研究小组中完成研究任务的。然而,很少有研究探讨这些小组在缓解学术孤独感方面的潜力。为了填补这一空白,我们设计了两个方法步骤。首先,我们采用了伍尔夫式的比喻--"我们自己的房间",在这个房间里,我们就自己的孤独感编写了个人小故事。我们互相阅读对方的文章,然后,在第二个步骤中,我们来到一个 "客厅",就我们新出现的想法进行协商,这与合作式自述相呼应。两位全职教授和两位早期研究人员从个人和专业角度反思并谈论了他们的学术孤独感。尽管工作稳定性不同,但四位参与者都承认曾有过被孤立和抛弃的感觉。我们认为,在当前新自由主义愈演愈烈的时代,将研究团体视为关怀团体而非实践团体,是一种更人性化、更可取的大学研究团体模式框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信