Noncomplex ventricular arrhythmia associated with greater freedom from recurrent ectopy at 1 year after mitral repair surgery

Dimosthenis Pandis MD, MSc , Navindra David BS , Ahmed EI-Eshmawi MD , Marc A. Miller MD , Percy Boateng MD , Ana Claudia Costa MD, PhD , Philip Robson PhD , Maria Giovanna Trivieri MD , Zahi Fayad PhD , Anelechi C. Anyanwu MD, MSc , David H. Adams MD
{"title":"Noncomplex ventricular arrhythmia associated with greater freedom from recurrent ectopy at 1 year after mitral repair surgery","authors":"Dimosthenis Pandis MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Navindra David BS ,&nbsp;Ahmed EI-Eshmawi MD ,&nbsp;Marc A. Miller MD ,&nbsp;Percy Boateng MD ,&nbsp;Ana Claudia Costa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Philip Robson PhD ,&nbsp;Maria Giovanna Trivieri MD ,&nbsp;Zahi Fayad PhD ,&nbsp;Anelechi C. Anyanwu MD, MSc ,&nbsp;David H. Adams MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The effect of mitral valve (MV) surgery on the natural history of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in patients with arrhythmic MV prolapse remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the cumulative incidence of VA at 1 year after surgical mitral repair.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of progressively captured data identified 204 consecutive patients who underwent elective MV repair for significant degenerative mitral regurgitation as a first-time cardiovascular intervention in a quaternary reference center between January 2018 and December 2020. A subset of 62 consecutive patients with diagnosed arrhythmic MV prolapse was further evaluated for recurrent VA after MV repair.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median age was 62 years (range, 27-77 years) and 26 of 62 (41.9%) were female. The median time from initial mitral regurgitation/MV prolaspe diagnosis-to-referral was 13.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 5.4-25) and from VA diagnosis-to-referral was 8 years (IQR, 3-10.6). Using the Lown-Wolf classification, complex VA (Lown grade ≥3) was identified in 36 of 62 patients (58%) at baseline, whereas 8 of 62 (13%) had a cardioverter/defibrillator implanted for primary (4/8) or secondary (4/8) prevention. Left ventricular myocardial scar was confirmed in 23 of 34 (68%) of patients scanned at baseline. The prevailing valve phenotype was bileaflet Barlow (59/62; 95.2%). All patients underwent surgical MV repair by the same team. Surgical repair was stabilized with an annuloplasty prosthesis (median size 36 mm [IQR, 34-38]). Concomitant procedures included tricuspid valve repair (51/62; 82.3%), cryo-maze ± left atrial appendage exclusion (14/62, 23%), and endocardial cryoablation of VA ectopy (4/62; 6.5%). The 30-day and 1-year freedom from recurrent VA were 98.4% and 75.9%, respectively. Absent VA after mitral repair was uniformly observed in patients with minor VA at baseline. Absent VA after mitral repair was uniformly observed in patients with minor VA preoperatively. Complex baseline VA was the strongest predictor of recurrent VA (hazard ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-84.2; <em>P</em> = .024), irrespective of myocardial fibrosis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In a series of 62 consecutive patients operated electively for arrhythmic mitral prolapse, VA remained undetected in 75.9% of patients at 1 year. Freedom from recurrent VA was greater among patients without complex VA preoperatively, whereas baseline Lown grade ≥3 was the strongest independent risk factor for recurrent VA at 1 year. These findings attest to the importance of early recognition and prompt referral of patients with mitral prolapse and progressive VA to specialty interdisciplinary care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 94-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624001074/pdfft?md5=654dde242501a48612881a9d15e1694d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666273624001074-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624001074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The effect of mitral valve (MV) surgery on the natural history of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in patients with arrhythmic MV prolapse remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the cumulative incidence of VA at 1 year after surgical mitral repair.

Methods

A retrospective review of progressively captured data identified 204 consecutive patients who underwent elective MV repair for significant degenerative mitral regurgitation as a first-time cardiovascular intervention in a quaternary reference center between January 2018 and December 2020. A subset of 62 consecutive patients with diagnosed arrhythmic MV prolapse was further evaluated for recurrent VA after MV repair.

Results

The median age was 62 years (range, 27-77 years) and 26 of 62 (41.9%) were female. The median time from initial mitral regurgitation/MV prolaspe diagnosis-to-referral was 13.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 5.4-25) and from VA diagnosis-to-referral was 8 years (IQR, 3-10.6). Using the Lown-Wolf classification, complex VA (Lown grade ≥3) was identified in 36 of 62 patients (58%) at baseline, whereas 8 of 62 (13%) had a cardioverter/defibrillator implanted for primary (4/8) or secondary (4/8) prevention. Left ventricular myocardial scar was confirmed in 23 of 34 (68%) of patients scanned at baseline. The prevailing valve phenotype was bileaflet Barlow (59/62; 95.2%). All patients underwent surgical MV repair by the same team. Surgical repair was stabilized with an annuloplasty prosthesis (median size 36 mm [IQR, 34-38]). Concomitant procedures included tricuspid valve repair (51/62; 82.3%), cryo-maze ± left atrial appendage exclusion (14/62, 23%), and endocardial cryoablation of VA ectopy (4/62; 6.5%). The 30-day and 1-year freedom from recurrent VA were 98.4% and 75.9%, respectively. Absent VA after mitral repair was uniformly observed in patients with minor VA at baseline. Absent VA after mitral repair was uniformly observed in patients with minor VA preoperatively. Complex baseline VA was the strongest predictor of recurrent VA (hazard ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-84.2; P = .024), irrespective of myocardial fibrosis.

Conclusions

In a series of 62 consecutive patients operated electively for arrhythmic mitral prolapse, VA remained undetected in 75.9% of patients at 1 year. Freedom from recurrent VA was greater among patients without complex VA preoperatively, whereas baseline Lown grade ≥3 was the strongest independent risk factor for recurrent VA at 1 year. These findings attest to the importance of early recognition and prompt referral of patients with mitral prolapse and progressive VA to specialty interdisciplinary care.

二尖瓣修复手术后 1 年,非复杂性室性心律失常与较高的复发性异位自由度相关。
目的二尖瓣手术对心律失常性二尖瓣脱垂患者室性心律失常(VA)自然史的影响仍不清楚。我们试图评估二尖瓣手术修复后 1 年的室性心律失常累积发生率。方法回顾性审查逐步获取的数据,确定了 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在一家四级参考中心首次接受心血管干预的 204 名连续患者,这些患者因显著退行性二尖瓣反流接受了选择性二尖瓣修复术。对62名确诊为心律失常二尖瓣脱垂的连续患者子集进行了进一步评估,以确定二尖瓣修复术后是否复发二尖瓣反流。从最初诊断二尖瓣反流/中上叶增生到转诊的中位时间为13.8年(四分位距[IQR],5.4-25),从诊断出VA到转诊的中位时间为8年(IQR,3-10.6)。根据 Lown-Wolf 分级法,62 名患者中有 36 人(58%)在基线时发现了复杂的 VA(Lown 分级≥3),62 人中有 8 人(13%)植入了心脏转复/除颤器,用于一级预防(4/8)或二级预防(4/8)。在基线扫描的 34 位患者中,有 23 位(68%)确认存在左心室心肌瘢痕。主要瓣膜表型为双叶巴洛瓣(59/62;95.2%)。所有患者都由同一个团队进行了中风瓣膜手术修复。手术修复时使用瓣环成形假体(中位尺寸为 36 毫米 [IQR,34-38])。同时进行的手术包括三尖瓣修复术(51/62;82.3%)、低温迷宫±左房阑尾切除术(14/62,23%)和VA异位的心内膜低温消融术(4/62;6.5%)。30天和1年内不再复发VA的比例分别为98.4%和75.9%。二尖瓣修复术后无VA的情况在基线时有轻微VA的患者中普遍存在。二尖瓣修复术后无VA的患者术前均有轻度VA。复杂基线VA是复发性VA的最强预测因素(危险比,10.8;95%置信区间,1.4-84.2;P = .024),与心肌纤维化无关。术前无复杂VA的患者更易复发VA,而基线Lown分级≥3是1年后复发VA的最强独立风险因素。这些研究结果证明了早期识别二尖瓣脱垂和进行性VA患者并及时转诊至专科跨学科治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信