Think-pair-share based flipped classroom: A model for improving students’ learning achievement and self-efficacy

K. Samaila, Chau Kien Tsong, Mona Masood, Brandford Bervell
{"title":"Think-pair-share based flipped classroom: A model for improving students’ learning achievement and self-efficacy","authors":"K. Samaila, Chau Kien Tsong, Mona Masood, Brandford Bervell","doi":"10.30935/jdet/14422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lack of clear instruction and teaching strategy during the in-class learning activities of flipped classroom (FC) model has affected the model’s efficacy. This study aims to improve FC model by proposing the think-pair-share-based flipped classroom model (TPS-FCM). This study investigates the effect of TPS-FCM on students’ academic achievement and self-efficacy in an information and communications technology (ICT) in education course. One hundred and seventy-three students were involved in the quasi-experimental study. The students in the experimental group (n=91) learned with TPS-FCM, and students in the control group (n=82) used the conventional flipped classroom model (CFCM). Pre-test, post-test, and survey were employed. Results showed that TPS-FCM significantly improved students’ ICT learning achievement and self-efficacy compared to CFCM. Gender was found to have been significantly affected by TPS-FCM in students’ learning achievement but not in self-efficacy. This study recommends think-pair-share (TPS) strategy to improve in-class activities in FC model. Moreover, the study has limitations because of using two different teachers, which might affect students’ learning achievement and self-efficacy. Nonetheless, this study contributed that integrating TPS into FC model improves in-class learning activities. Integrating TPS into the in-class learning activities proved the budding support to enhance the efficacy of FC model. Based on the results of this study, the authors suggested that flipped practitioners can use the think-pair-share strategy to minimize in-class issues, particularly the lack of clear instruction and teaching strategy. Many practical studies of FC model have already been conducted. The originality of this work is in the fact that it proposes a suitable strategy (TPS) to improve the in-class learning activities of the model. The study also explores the effect of the proposed model on students’ learning achievement and self-efficacy, which enrich the current literature.","PeriodicalId":417923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/14422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lack of clear instruction and teaching strategy during the in-class learning activities of flipped classroom (FC) model has affected the model’s efficacy. This study aims to improve FC model by proposing the think-pair-share-based flipped classroom model (TPS-FCM). This study investigates the effect of TPS-FCM on students’ academic achievement and self-efficacy in an information and communications technology (ICT) in education course. One hundred and seventy-three students were involved in the quasi-experimental study. The students in the experimental group (n=91) learned with TPS-FCM, and students in the control group (n=82) used the conventional flipped classroom model (CFCM). Pre-test, post-test, and survey were employed. Results showed that TPS-FCM significantly improved students’ ICT learning achievement and self-efficacy compared to CFCM. Gender was found to have been significantly affected by TPS-FCM in students’ learning achievement but not in self-efficacy. This study recommends think-pair-share (TPS) strategy to improve in-class activities in FC model. Moreover, the study has limitations because of using two different teachers, which might affect students’ learning achievement and self-efficacy. Nonetheless, this study contributed that integrating TPS into FC model improves in-class learning activities. Integrating TPS into the in-class learning activities proved the budding support to enhance the efficacy of FC model. Based on the results of this study, the authors suggested that flipped practitioners can use the think-pair-share strategy to minimize in-class issues, particularly the lack of clear instruction and teaching strategy. Many practical studies of FC model have already been conducted. The originality of this work is in the fact that it proposes a suitable strategy (TPS) to improve the in-class learning activities of the model. The study also explores the effect of the proposed model on students’ learning achievement and self-efficacy, which enrich the current literature.
基于 "思考-结对-分享 "的翻转课堂:提高学生学习成绩和自我效能感的模式
翻转课堂(FC)模式在课堂学习活动中缺乏明确的指导和教学策略,影响了该模式的效果。本研究旨在通过提出基于 "思考-结对-分享 "的翻转课堂教学模式(TPS-FCM)来改进翻转课堂教学模式。本研究调查了 TPS-FCM 在信息与通信技术(ICT)教育课程中对学生学业成绩和自我效能的影响。一百七十三名学生参与了这项准实验研究。实验组学生(人数=91)使用 TPS-FCM 学习,对照组学生(人数=82)使用传统翻转课堂模式(CFCM)。采用了前测、后测和问卷调查。结果显示,与传统翻转课堂模式相比,TPS-FCM 显著提高了学生的信息与通信技术学习成绩和自我效能感。研究发现,TPS-FCM 对学生的学习成绩有明显影响,但对自我效能感没有影响。本研究建议采用 "思考对分享"(TPS)策略来改进 FC 模式下的课堂活动。此外,本研究也有局限性,因为使用了两位不同的教师,这可能会影响学生的学习成绩和自我效能感。尽管如此,本研究表明,将 TPS 纳入 FC 模式可改善课堂学习活动。事实证明,将 TPS 纳入课堂学习活动对提高 FC 模式的效能具有崭新的支持作用。基于本研究的结果,作者建议翻转实践者可以使用 "思考-结对-分享 "策略来减少课堂问题,尤其是缺乏清晰的教学和教学策略的问题。关于 FC 模式的实践研究已有很多。这项工作的独创性在于它提出了一种合适的策略(TPS),以改善该模式的课内学习活动。本研究还探讨了所建议的模式对学生学习成绩和自我效能感的影响,丰富了现有文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信