Iatrogenic Vascular Injuries in Resource-Limited Setting: A 4-Year Experience Monocentric Retrospective Study

Nabeel Almadwahi, Ali Alkadri, Ali S. Fadhel, Mohamed Alshujaa, Faisal Ahmed, Mohamed Badheeb
{"title":"Iatrogenic Vascular Injuries in Resource-Limited Setting: A 4-Year Experience Monocentric Retrospective Study","authors":"Nabeel Almadwahi, Ali Alkadri, Ali S. Fadhel, Mohamed Alshujaa, Faisal Ahmed, Mohamed Badheeb","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S450213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Iatrogenic vascular injuries (IVIs) due to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions are known but rare or probably under-reported. We present our four-year findings on patients with IVIs after catheterization or surgery who underwent vascular surgical repairs in a resource-limited setting. Methods A retrospective case series study between Jun 2018 and Sep 2022 of 35 patients diagnosed with IVIs and treated surgically at our hospital was included. The data on IVIs including patient characteristics, causes and type of injury, treatment, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results The mean age was 37.12± 17.0 years, and most patients (65.7%) were male. Of the 35 IVIs, 21 were caused by percutaneous procedures, while 14 occurred intraoperatively and affected various arteries and veins. The main injured vessels were the femoral artery (20%) and direct blood vessel puncture made by non-qualified specialists (42.9%) during dialysis cannulation was the main cause. The intraoperative IVI affected the inferior vena cava in three patients, the aorta in two patients, the external iliac artery in four, the tibial and popliteal arteries in four, and the internal carotid artery in one. The following types of repairs were recorded: direct suture of the vessel with or without endarterectomy (71.4%), synthetic patch placement (25.7%), ligation (8.6%), bypass or interposition graft (14.3%), and thromboembolectomy (5.7%). Vascular repair was successful in 32 (91.4%) patients while three patients (8.6%) were expired. Complications occurred in 7 (20%) patients, of which superficial wound infections were the common complication (11.6%) and were treated with proper antibiotic therapy. Conclusion Prompt identification of IVIs, as well as proper triage for future treatment, can enhance patient outcomes. Our data showed that non-qualified specialists seem to be responsible for the majority of IVIs. For that, we emphasize the importance of performing vascular procedures by a qualified specialist with adequate training.","PeriodicalId":503614,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine : OAEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S450213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Iatrogenic vascular injuries (IVIs) due to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions are known but rare or probably under-reported. We present our four-year findings on patients with IVIs after catheterization or surgery who underwent vascular surgical repairs in a resource-limited setting. Methods A retrospective case series study between Jun 2018 and Sep 2022 of 35 patients diagnosed with IVIs and treated surgically at our hospital was included. The data on IVIs including patient characteristics, causes and type of injury, treatment, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results The mean age was 37.12± 17.0 years, and most patients (65.7%) were male. Of the 35 IVIs, 21 were caused by percutaneous procedures, while 14 occurred intraoperatively and affected various arteries and veins. The main injured vessels were the femoral artery (20%) and direct blood vessel puncture made by non-qualified specialists (42.9%) during dialysis cannulation was the main cause. The intraoperative IVI affected the inferior vena cava in three patients, the aorta in two patients, the external iliac artery in four, the tibial and popliteal arteries in four, and the internal carotid artery in one. The following types of repairs were recorded: direct suture of the vessel with or without endarterectomy (71.4%), synthetic patch placement (25.7%), ligation (8.6%), bypass or interposition graft (14.3%), and thromboembolectomy (5.7%). Vascular repair was successful in 32 (91.4%) patients while three patients (8.6%) were expired. Complications occurred in 7 (20%) patients, of which superficial wound infections were the common complication (11.6%) and were treated with proper antibiotic therapy. Conclusion Prompt identification of IVIs, as well as proper triage for future treatment, can enhance patient outcomes. Our data showed that non-qualified specialists seem to be responsible for the majority of IVIs. For that, we emphasize the importance of performing vascular procedures by a qualified specialist with adequate training.
资源有限环境中的先天性血管损伤:一项为期 4 年的单中心回顾性研究
背景 因诊断和治疗干预而导致的先天性血管损伤(IVIs)是众所周知的,但非常罕见或可能未得到充分报道。我们介绍了四年来在资源有限的环境中对导管插入术或手术后接受血管外科修复的 IVI 患者的研究结果。方法 在 2018 年 6 月至 2022 年 9 月期间,我们对本院确诊为 IVI 并接受手术治疗的 35 例患者进行了回顾性病例系列研究。收集并分析了包括患者特征、损伤原因和类型、治疗和结果在内的 IVIs 数据。结果 平均年龄(37.12±17.0)岁,大多数患者(65.7%)为男性。在 35 例 IVI 中,21 例由经皮手术引起,14 例发生在术中,并影响到各种动脉和静脉。主要损伤血管是股动脉(20%),非专业人员(42.9%)在透析插管时直接穿刺血管是主要原因。术中静脉穿刺影响到 3 名患者的下腔静脉、2 名患者的主动脉、4 名患者的髂外动脉、4 名患者的胫动脉和腘动脉以及 1 名患者的颈内动脉。记录的修复类型如下:直接缝合血管并进行或不进行动脉内膜切除术(71.4%)、放置合成补片(25.7%)、结扎(8.6%)、搭桥或插管移植(14.3%)和血栓栓塞切除术(5.7%)。32例(91.4%)患者的血管修复成功,3例(8.6%)患者过期。7例(20%)患者出现并发症,其中浅表伤口感染是常见并发症(11.6%),患者均接受了适当的抗生素治疗。结论 及时发现 IVIs 并为今后的治疗进行适当分流,可提高患者的治疗效果。我们的数据显示,大多数 IVI 似乎是由不合格的专科医生造成的。因此,我们强调由受过适当培训的合格专科医生实施血管手术的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信