Comparison of Spot Vision Screener and Tabletop Autorefractometer with Retinoscopy in the Pediatric Population

Q3 Medicine
Mehtap Arslantürk Eren, Hilal Nalcı Baytaroğlu, H. Atilla
{"title":"Comparison of Spot Vision Screener and Tabletop Autorefractometer with Retinoscopy in the Pediatric Population","authors":"Mehtap Arslantürk Eren, Hilal Nalcı Baytaroğlu, H. Atilla","doi":"10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.93607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Determining the accuracy of cycloplegic refractive error measurements made with the Spot Vision Screener (SVS, Welch Allyn Inc, Skaneateles Falls, NY, USA) is important for refractive assessment of uncooperative patients during optometric examinations. This study compared cycloplegic refractive errors measured by SVS and tabletop autorefractometer to cycloplegic retinoscopy in children. Materials and Methods: Eighty-eight eyes of 44 subjects were examined in the study. Refractive error measurements were obtained under cycloplegia using retinoscopy, SVS, and Nidek ARK-530 tabletop autorefractometer (ARK-530, Nidek, Japan). Spherical and cylindrical values, spherical equivalents (SE), and Jackson cross-cylinder values at axes of 0° (J0) and 45° (J45) were recorded. Correlations between methods were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The mean age was 7 years (range: 6 months-17 years). Sixteen (36%) of the subjects were female and 28 (64%) were male. For SE there was excellent agreement between retinoscopy and SVS (ICC: 0.924) and between retinoscopy and tabletop autorefractometer (ICC: 0.995). While there was a moderate correlation between retinoscopy and SVS for cylindrical values (ICC: 0.686), excellent correlation was detected between retinoscopy and autorefractometer (ICC: 0.966). J0 and J45 crosscylinder power values were not correlated between retinoscopy and SVS (ICC: 0.472) or retinoscopy and tabletop autorefractometer (ICC: 0.442). Retinoscopy was correlated with both SVS and tabletop autorefractometer for all parameters within ±1.96 standard deviations in Bland-Altman analysis. Conclusion: Cycloplegic retinoscopy is the gold standard for refractive error measurement in the pediatric population. However, it requires time and experienced professionals. This study revealed moderate to good agreement between SVS and retinoscopy, with better agreement in spherical errors than cylindrical errors. Although the SVS is intended for screening programs, it may also be useful in the pediatric eye office to estimate spherical refractive error in uncooperative patients.","PeriodicalId":23373,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"128 ","pages":"56 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.93607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Determining the accuracy of cycloplegic refractive error measurements made with the Spot Vision Screener (SVS, Welch Allyn Inc, Skaneateles Falls, NY, USA) is important for refractive assessment of uncooperative patients during optometric examinations. This study compared cycloplegic refractive errors measured by SVS and tabletop autorefractometer to cycloplegic retinoscopy in children. Materials and Methods: Eighty-eight eyes of 44 subjects were examined in the study. Refractive error measurements were obtained under cycloplegia using retinoscopy, SVS, and Nidek ARK-530 tabletop autorefractometer (ARK-530, Nidek, Japan). Spherical and cylindrical values, spherical equivalents (SE), and Jackson cross-cylinder values at axes of 0° (J0) and 45° (J45) were recorded. Correlations between methods were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The mean age was 7 years (range: 6 months-17 years). Sixteen (36%) of the subjects were female and 28 (64%) were male. For SE there was excellent agreement between retinoscopy and SVS (ICC: 0.924) and between retinoscopy and tabletop autorefractometer (ICC: 0.995). While there was a moderate correlation between retinoscopy and SVS for cylindrical values (ICC: 0.686), excellent correlation was detected between retinoscopy and autorefractometer (ICC: 0.966). J0 and J45 crosscylinder power values were not correlated between retinoscopy and SVS (ICC: 0.472) or retinoscopy and tabletop autorefractometer (ICC: 0.442). Retinoscopy was correlated with both SVS and tabletop autorefractometer for all parameters within ±1.96 standard deviations in Bland-Altman analysis. Conclusion: Cycloplegic retinoscopy is the gold standard for refractive error measurement in the pediatric population. However, it requires time and experienced professionals. This study revealed moderate to good agreement between SVS and retinoscopy, with better agreement in spherical errors than cylindrical errors. Although the SVS is intended for screening programs, it may also be useful in the pediatric eye office to estimate spherical refractive error in uncooperative patients.
点式视力筛查仪和台式自动屈光仪与视网膜镜在儿科人群中的比较
目的:确定用点视力筛查仪(SVS,Welch Allyn Inc,Skaneateles Falls,NY,USA)进行的环视屈光不正测量的准确性,对于在验光检查中对不合作的患者进行屈光评估非常重要。本研究比较了用 SVS 和台式自动屈光仪测量的儿童屈光误差与环形视网膜镜测量的屈光误差。材料和方法:本研究共检查了 44 名受试者的 88 只眼睛。使用视网膜镜、SVS 和 Nidek ARK-530 台式自动屈光仪(ARK-530,日本 Nidek 公司)在环形透镜下测量屈光不正。记录了0°轴(J0)和45°轴(J45)的球面和柱面值、球面等值(SE)和杰克逊交叉圆柱体值。使用类内相关系数 (ICC) 和 Bland-Altman 分析法分析了各种方法之间的相关性。结果平均年龄为 7 岁(范围:6 个月-17 岁)。16名受试者(36%)为女性,28名受试者(64%)为男性。在 SE 方面,视网膜镜和 SVS(ICC:0.924)以及视网膜镜和台式自动折射仪(ICC:0.995)之间的一致性非常好。虽然视网膜镜和 SVS 之间的圆柱值相关性一般(ICC:0.686),但视网膜镜和自动折射仪之间的相关性非常好(ICC:0.966)。视网膜镜与 SVS(ICC:0.472)或视网膜镜与台式自动折射仪(ICC:0.442)之间的 J0 和 J45 跨圆柱体功率值没有相关性。在Bland-Altman分析中,视网膜镜与SVS和台式自动折射仪的所有参数的相关性均在±1.96标准差以内。结论环形视网膜镜检查是测量儿童屈光不正的黄金标准。然而,它需要时间和经验丰富的专业人员。本研究显示,SVS 与视网膜镜之间的一致性为中等至良好,球面误差的一致性优于柱面误差。虽然SVS是为筛查项目设计的,但在儿科眼科诊室中也可用于估算不合作患者的球面屈光不正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology (TJO) is the only scientific periodical publication of the Turkish Ophthalmological Association and has been published since January 1929. In its early years, the journal was published in Turkish and French. Although there were temporary interruptions in the publication of the journal due to various challenges, the Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology has been published continually from 1971 to the present. The target audience includes specialists and physicians in training in ophthalmology in all relevant disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信