Assuming Photon as Extended Point Particle in the HyperSoft Topological Space and other Hypotheses: Issues and Trend Analysis

V. Christianto, F. Smarandache
{"title":"Assuming Photon as Extended Point Particle in the HyperSoft Topological Space and other Hypotheses: Issues and Trend Analysis","authors":"V. Christianto, F. Smarandache","doi":"10.61356/j.hsse.2024.1200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following our preceding article, where we discussed alternative interpretations of the advanced perihelion of Mercury, the present article revisits the 1919 solar eclipse expedition led by Arthur Eddington, which famously provided the first observational confirmation of Einstein's theory of general relativity. We focus on the deflection of starlight data obtained during the eclipse, a cornerstone of this validation. Here, we explore three alternative explanations for the observed light bending that challenge the sole attribution to general relativity. Firstly, the paper begins by arguing based on criticisms raised by Tullio Levi-Civita, a contemporary mathematician, regarding Einstein's use of pseudo-tensors in his calculations. Levi-Civita argued that this approach introduced unnecessary complexity and obscured alternative interpretations of the data. Secondly, we delve into astrophysical phenomena that could mimic the observed light deflection, based on the varying speed of light, by assuming a photon has mass. (cf. ‘t Hooft et al., Light is Heavy). Moreover, in the literature, Molodtsov initiated soft set theory as an extension of fuzzy set theory to deal with uncertainties occurring in the natural and social sciences. It attracted the attention of mathematicians as well as social scientists due to its potential to unify certain mathematical aspects and applications in decision making processes; therefore, we shall discuss a bit how to model the photon as an extended massive particle of light, possibly related to such a soft set point [15, 16]. For further exploration, it is possible to assume the crystalline lattice of subvacuum structure (cf. Gremaud) as part of hypersoft topological spaces [16, 16a]. We strongly believe that the true strength of science lies in its continuous search for evidence and refinement of existing models.  Therefore, it can be expected that new data can be helpful to reevaluate these matters, for instance, in the upcoming eclipse in the next month of 2024.","PeriodicalId":518392,"journal":{"name":"HyperSoft Set Methods in Engineering","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HyperSoft Set Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61356/j.hsse.2024.1200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following our preceding article, where we discussed alternative interpretations of the advanced perihelion of Mercury, the present article revisits the 1919 solar eclipse expedition led by Arthur Eddington, which famously provided the first observational confirmation of Einstein's theory of general relativity. We focus on the deflection of starlight data obtained during the eclipse, a cornerstone of this validation. Here, we explore three alternative explanations for the observed light bending that challenge the sole attribution to general relativity. Firstly, the paper begins by arguing based on criticisms raised by Tullio Levi-Civita, a contemporary mathematician, regarding Einstein's use of pseudo-tensors in his calculations. Levi-Civita argued that this approach introduced unnecessary complexity and obscured alternative interpretations of the data. Secondly, we delve into astrophysical phenomena that could mimic the observed light deflection, based on the varying speed of light, by assuming a photon has mass. (cf. ‘t Hooft et al., Light is Heavy). Moreover, in the literature, Molodtsov initiated soft set theory as an extension of fuzzy set theory to deal with uncertainties occurring in the natural and social sciences. It attracted the attention of mathematicians as well as social scientists due to its potential to unify certain mathematical aspects and applications in decision making processes; therefore, we shall discuss a bit how to model the photon as an extended massive particle of light, possibly related to such a soft set point [15, 16]. For further exploration, it is possible to assume the crystalline lattice of subvacuum structure (cf. Gremaud) as part of hypersoft topological spaces [16, 16a]. We strongly believe that the true strength of science lies in its continuous search for evidence and refinement of existing models.  Therefore, it can be expected that new data can be helpful to reevaluate these matters, for instance, in the upcoming eclipse in the next month of 2024.
假设光子是超软拓扑空间中的扩展点粒子及其他假设:问题与趋势分析
我们在上一篇文章中讨论了水星近日点提前的其他解释,本篇文章将重温阿瑟-爱丁顿(Arthur Eddington)领导的 1919 年日食考察,这次考察为爱因斯坦的广义相对论提供了第一个著名的观测证实。我们将重点放在日食期间获得的星光偏转数据上,这是此次验证的基石。在此,我们探讨了观测到的光弯曲的三种替代解释,这些解释对广义相对论的唯一归因提出了质疑。首先,本文以当代数学家 Tullio Levi-Civita 对爱因斯坦在计算中使用伪张量提出的批评为基础展开论证。Levi-Civita 认为,这种方法带来了不必要的复杂性,掩盖了对数据的其他解释。其次,我们深入研究了天体物理现象,通过假定光子具有质量,在光速变化的基础上模拟观测到的光偏转。(参见 't Hooft 等人,《光很重》)。此外,在文献中,莫洛佐夫提出了软集合理论,作为模糊集合理论的扩展,用于处理自然科学和社会科学中出现的不确定性。由于软集理论有可能将某些数学问题和决策过程中的应用统一起来,因此吸引了数学家和社会科学家的关注;因此,我们将讨论一下如何将光子建模为一种扩展的大质量光粒子,这可能与软集点有关 [15, 16]。为了进一步探讨,我们可以假定亚真空结构的晶格(参见 Gremaud)是超软拓扑空间的一部分[16, 16a]。我们坚信,科学的真正力量在于不断寻找证据和完善现有模型。 因此,我们可以期待新的数据能够帮助我们重新评估这些问题,例如即将在 2024 年下个月发生的日食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书