Association Between Body Composition and Survival in Patients With Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: An Automated Deep Learning Approach.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
M. Jung, T. Diallo, Tobias Scheef, Marco Reisert, Alexander Rau, Maximilan F Russe, Fabian Bamberg, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, M. Quante, Jakob Weiss
{"title":"Association Between Body Composition and Survival in Patients With Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: An Automated Deep Learning Approach.","authors":"M. Jung, T. Diallo, Tobias Scheef, Marco Reisert, Alexander Rau, Maximilan F Russe, Fabian Bamberg, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, M. Quante, Jakob Weiss","doi":"10.1200/CCI.23.00231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nBody composition (BC) may play a role in outcome prognostication in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEAC). Artificial intelligence provides new possibilities to opportunistically quantify BC from computed tomography (CT) scans. We developed a deep learning (DL) model for fully automatic BC quantification on routine staging CTs and determined its prognostic role in a clinical cohort of patients with GEAC.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nWe developed and tested a DL model to quantify BC measures defined as subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and skeletal muscle on routine CT and investigated their prognostic value in a cohort of patients with GEAC using baseline, 3-6-month, and 6-12-month postoperative CTs. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Cox regression assessed the association between (1) BC at baseline and mortality and (2) the decrease in BC between baseline and follow-up scans and mortality/DFS.\n\n\nRESULTS\nModel performance was high with Dice coefficients ≥0.94 ± 0.06. Among 299 patients with GEAC (age 63.0 ± 10.7 years; 19.4% female), 140 deaths (47%) occurred over a median follow-up of 31.3 months. At baseline, no BC measure was associated with DFS. Only a substantial decrease in VAT >70% after a 6- to 12-month follow-up was associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99 [95% CI, 1.18 to 3.34]; P = .009) and DFS (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.01 to 2.95]; P = .045) independent of age, sex, BMI, Union for International Cancer Control stage, histologic grading, resection status, neoadjuvant therapy, and time between surgery and follow-up CT.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nDL enables opportunistic estimation of BC from routine staging CT to quantify prognostic information. In patients with GEAC, only a substantial decrease of VAT 6-12 months postsurgery was an independent predictor for DFS beyond traditional risk factors, which may help to identify individuals at high risk who go otherwise unnoticed.","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Body composition (BC) may play a role in outcome prognostication in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEAC). Artificial intelligence provides new possibilities to opportunistically quantify BC from computed tomography (CT) scans. We developed a deep learning (DL) model for fully automatic BC quantification on routine staging CTs and determined its prognostic role in a clinical cohort of patients with GEAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS We developed and tested a DL model to quantify BC measures defined as subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and skeletal muscle on routine CT and investigated their prognostic value in a cohort of patients with GEAC using baseline, 3-6-month, and 6-12-month postoperative CTs. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Cox regression assessed the association between (1) BC at baseline and mortality and (2) the decrease in BC between baseline and follow-up scans and mortality/DFS. RESULTS Model performance was high with Dice coefficients ≥0.94 ± 0.06. Among 299 patients with GEAC (age 63.0 ± 10.7 years; 19.4% female), 140 deaths (47%) occurred over a median follow-up of 31.3 months. At baseline, no BC measure was associated with DFS. Only a substantial decrease in VAT >70% after a 6- to 12-month follow-up was associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99 [95% CI, 1.18 to 3.34]; P = .009) and DFS (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.01 to 2.95]; P = .045) independent of age, sex, BMI, Union for International Cancer Control stage, histologic grading, resection status, neoadjuvant therapy, and time between surgery and follow-up CT. CONCLUSION DL enables opportunistic estimation of BC from routine staging CT to quantify prognostic information. In patients with GEAC, only a substantial decrease of VAT 6-12 months postsurgery was an independent predictor for DFS beyond traditional risk factors, which may help to identify individuals at high risk who go otherwise unnoticed.
胃食管腺癌患者身体成分与存活率之间的关系:一种自动深度学习方法
目的身体成分(BC)可能会对胃食管腺癌(GEAC)患者的预后结果产生影响。人工智能为从计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描中适时量化BC提供了新的可能性。我们开发并测试了一种深度学习(DL)模型,用于在常规分期 CT 上全自动量化 BC,并利用基线、3-6 个月和术后 6-12 个月的 CT 在 GEAC 患者队列中确定其预后作用。主要结果是全因死亡率,次要结果是无病生存期(DFS)。Cox回归评估了(1)基线BC与死亡率之间的关系;(2)基线与随访扫描之间BC的下降与死亡率/DFS之间的关系。在 299 名 GEAC 患者(年龄为 63.0 ± 10.7 岁;19.4% 为女性)中,有 140 人(47%)在中位 31.3 个月的随访期间死亡。基线时,没有任何BC指标与DFS相关。只有在随访 6 至 12 个月后 VAT 大幅下降 >70% 才与死亡率(危险比 [HR],1.99 [95% CI,1.18 至 3.34];P = .009)和 DFS(HR,1.73 [95% CI,1.01 至 2.95];P = .结论DL能根据常规分期CT对BC进行机会性估计,量化预后信息。在GEAC患者中,只有术后6-12个月VAT的大幅下降才是超越传统风险因素的DFS独立预测因素,这可能有助于识别那些未被注意的高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信