Bayesian estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of coprological and serological diagnostic tests for the detection of Ascaris suum infection on pig farms

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
{"title":"Bayesian estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of coprological and serological diagnostic tests for the detection of Ascaris suum infection on pig farms","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpara.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Coprological and serological diagnostic tests were compared to define the status of a pig farm with regard to <em>Ascaris suum</em>. On each of the 100 farms in France visited for the study, 10 blood samples were taken from pigs at the end of fattening (at least 22 weeks old) and 20 to 30 faecal samples were taken, depending on the category of animals present on the farm (10 sows, 10 piglets aged 10 to 12 weeks and 10 pigs at the end of fattening, aged at least 22 weeks). A SERASCA® ELISA test (Laboratory of Parasitology, Ghent University) was performed on each blood sample (cut-off 0.5) and a coprological analysis on each faecal sample. A Bayesian approach was used to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the coprological and serological tests. A farm was considered positive if at least one <em>A. suum</em> egg was observed in the faecal samples. With regard to the serological test, various hypotheses were tested in order to define the number of seropositive animals required to consider a farm positive for <em>A. suum</em>. The coprological test has very good specificity in the search for <em>A. suum</em>, whether 20 or 30 samples are taken per farm. However, even with an increase in the number of samples, the sensitivity of this diagnostic approach is very low (less than 30%). On the other hand, the serological diagnostic method, which consists of taking blood samples from 10 animals at the end of fattening, has good sensitivity and seems better suited to defining the status of a farm with regard to <em>A. suum</em>, provided that a farm is considered seropositive only if two out of 10 samples are positive.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13725,"journal":{"name":"International journal for parasitology","volume":"54 10","pages":"Pages 523-533"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020751924000808/pdfft?md5=a406f431556c5d7ac96323016073abfe&pid=1-s2.0-S0020751924000808-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020751924000808","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coprological and serological diagnostic tests were compared to define the status of a pig farm with regard to Ascaris suum. On each of the 100 farms in France visited for the study, 10 blood samples were taken from pigs at the end of fattening (at least 22 weeks old) and 20 to 30 faecal samples were taken, depending on the category of animals present on the farm (10 sows, 10 piglets aged 10 to 12 weeks and 10 pigs at the end of fattening, aged at least 22 weeks). A SERASCA® ELISA test (Laboratory of Parasitology, Ghent University) was performed on each blood sample (cut-off 0.5) and a coprological analysis on each faecal sample. A Bayesian approach was used to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the coprological and serological tests. A farm was considered positive if at least one A. suum egg was observed in the faecal samples. With regard to the serological test, various hypotheses were tested in order to define the number of seropositive animals required to consider a farm positive for A. suum. The coprological test has very good specificity in the search for A. suum, whether 20 or 30 samples are taken per farm. However, even with an increase in the number of samples, the sensitivity of this diagnostic approach is very low (less than 30%). On the other hand, the serological diagnostic method, which consists of taking blood samples from 10 animals at the end of fattening, has good sensitivity and seems better suited to defining the status of a farm with regard to A. suum, provided that a farm is considered seropositive only if two out of 10 samples are positive.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用贝叶斯法估算猪场蛔虫感染检测中桡骨学和血清学诊断测试的灵敏度和特异性
通过比较弧菌和血清学诊断测试来确定养猪场的蛔虫状况。在法国考察的 100 个猪场中,每个猪场从育肥末期(至少 22 周龄)的猪身上采集 10 份血液样本,并根据猪场的动物类别(10 头母猪、10 头 10-12 周龄的仔猪和 10 头育肥末期(至少 22 周龄)的猪)采集 20-30 份粪便样本。对每份血液样本进行 SERASCA® 酶联免疫吸附试验(根特大学寄生虫学实验室)(临界值为 0.5),对每份粪便样本进行粪便分析。贝叶斯法用于估算桡骨学和血清学检测的灵敏度和特异性。如果在粪便样本中观察到至少一个鼠卵,则该农场被视为阳性。在血清学检测方面,对各种假设进行了测试,以确定将一个猪场判定为鼠疫阳性所需的血清阳性动物数量。无论每个猪场采集 20 个样本还是 30 个样本,粪便检测对猪甲虫的检测都有很好的特异性。然而,即使样本数量增加,这种诊断方法的灵敏度也非常低(低于 30%)。另一方面,血清学诊断方法是在育肥结束时抽取 10 头牲畜的血液样本,灵敏度较高,似乎更适于确定猪场的猪蓝耳病状况,前提是 10 个样本中有 2 个呈阳性,猪场才会被视为血清阳性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: International Journal for Parasitology offers authors the option to sponsor nonsubscriber access to their articles on Elsevier electronic publishing platforms. For more information please view our Sponsored Articles page. The International Journal for Parasitology publishes the results of original research in all aspects of basic and applied parasitology, including all the fields covered by its Specialist Editors, and ranging from parasites and host-parasite relationships of intrinsic biological interest to those of social and economic importance in human and veterinary medicine and agriculture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信