Personal Pronouns in Biden’s Inaugural Speech: A Critical Discourse Perspective

M. M. I. Romadlani
{"title":"Personal Pronouns in Biden’s Inaugural Speech: A Critical Discourse Perspective","authors":"M. M. I. Romadlani","doi":"10.24071/joll.v24i1.6330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research primarily examines the first-person personal pronouns in political discourse, political speech in particular. This research aims to reveal how the pronoun I and we are exploited by the politician for the specific intention in political discourse. This research contextually investigates those personal pronouns and their inflectional forms based on the critical discourse analysis perspective, revealing the function and the purpose of producing a particular and an intentional personal pronoun to refer to specific addressee(s). That linguistic strategy in political context indicate the social and political relation between the speaker and the referents. The data in this research were taken from the script of Biden’s inaugural speech given in 2021. From 224 first-person personal pronouns, Biden produced the pronoun I and its inflectional forms 63 times or 28,1% and the pronoun we and its inflectional forms 161 times or 71,9 in percentage. Even though the plural form was identified as the most first-person personal pronoun produced by Biden, the occurrence of the pronoun we and its inflectional forms excluded Kamala Harris as his vice president. Biden exploited the first-person singular personal pronoun to express his gratitude, quality, positive image and persuasively to ingratiate the citizens. On the other hand, Biden expressed the pronoun we and its inflectional forms to establish a sense of national unity, togetherness to confront the challenges, and sharing responsibility. Personal pronouns no longer deal with language structure analysis only, but they are also employed to persuasively affect socio-political position, especially in a political context. ","PeriodicalId":34541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Literature","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i1.6330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research primarily examines the first-person personal pronouns in political discourse, political speech in particular. This research aims to reveal how the pronoun I and we are exploited by the politician for the specific intention in political discourse. This research contextually investigates those personal pronouns and their inflectional forms based on the critical discourse analysis perspective, revealing the function and the purpose of producing a particular and an intentional personal pronoun to refer to specific addressee(s). That linguistic strategy in political context indicate the social and political relation between the speaker and the referents. The data in this research were taken from the script of Biden’s inaugural speech given in 2021. From 224 first-person personal pronouns, Biden produced the pronoun I and its inflectional forms 63 times or 28,1% and the pronoun we and its inflectional forms 161 times or 71,9 in percentage. Even though the plural form was identified as the most first-person personal pronoun produced by Biden, the occurrence of the pronoun we and its inflectional forms excluded Kamala Harris as his vice president. Biden exploited the first-person singular personal pronoun to express his gratitude, quality, positive image and persuasively to ingratiate the citizens. On the other hand, Biden expressed the pronoun we and its inflectional forms to establish a sense of national unity, togetherness to confront the challenges, and sharing responsibility. Personal pronouns no longer deal with language structure analysis only, but they are also employed to persuasively affect socio-political position, especially in a political context. 
拜登就职演说中的人称代词:批判性话语视角
本研究主要探讨政治话语,尤其是政治演讲中的第一人称人称代词。本研究旨在揭示政治话语中政治家是如何出于特定意图使用代词 "我 "和 "我们 "的。本研究基于批判性话语分析的视角,对这些人称代词及其转折形式进行了语境研究,揭示了产生特定的、有意的人称代词来指称特定对象的功能和目的。政治语境中的这一语言策略表明了说话者与指称者之间的社会和政治关系。本研究的数据来自拜登 2021 年的就职演讲稿。在 224 个第一人称人称代词中,拜登使用代词 I 及其变格形式 63 次,占 28.1%;使用代词 we 及其变格形式 161 次,占 71.9%。尽管复数形式被认为是拜登使用最多的第一人称人称代词,但代词 we 及其变格形式的出现排除了卡马拉-哈里斯作为副总统的可能性。拜登利用第一人称单数人称代词来表达他的感激之情、品质、正面形象,并有说服力地拉拢公民。另一方面,拜登使用人称代词 "我们 "及其转折形式来建立一种民族团结、共同应对挑战和分担责任的意识。人称代词不再仅仅涉及语言结构分析,它们还被用来影响社会政治立场,尤其是在政治语境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信