Hemodiafiltration versus Hemodialysis in End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Maria Gabriela Motta Guimarães , Fernanda Pinheiro Martin Tapioca , Naiara Rodrigues dos Santos , Fernanda Pitta do Carmo Tourinho Ferreira , Luiz Carlos Santana Passos , Paulo Novis Rocha
{"title":"Hemodiafiltration versus Hemodialysis in End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Maria Gabriela Motta Guimarães ,&nbsp;Fernanda Pinheiro Martin Tapioca ,&nbsp;Naiara Rodrigues dos Santos ,&nbsp;Fernanda Pitta do Carmo Tourinho Ferreira ,&nbsp;Luiz Carlos Santana Passos ,&nbsp;Paulo Novis Rocha","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><p>The use of hemodiafiltration (HDF) as a kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) has sparked a debate regarding its advantages over conventional hemodialysis (HD). The present study aims to shed light on this controversy by comparing mortality rates and cause-specific deaths between ESKD patients receiving HDF and those undergoing HD.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central on July 1, 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><p>Adult patients with ESKD on regular KRT.</p></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><p>Studies with participants undergoing HDF.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, deaths related to infections, and kidney transplant. We also evaluated the endpoints for deaths related to malignancy, myocardial infarction, stroke, arrhythmias, and sudden death.</p></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><p>We included RCTs evaluating HDF versus HD. Crossover trials and studies with overlapping populations were excluded. Two authors independently extracted the data following predefined search criteria and quality assessment. The risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane’s RoB2 tool.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 5 RCTs with 4,143 patients, of which 2,078 (50.1%) underwent HDF, whereas 2,065 (49.8%) were receiving HD. Overall, HDF was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.91; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001; I<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->7%) and a lower risk of CV-related deaths (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.007; I<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0%). The incidence of infection-related deaths was also significantly different between therapies (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.95; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02; I<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->26%).</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>In individual studies, the HDF groups achieved varying levels of convection volume.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Compared with those undergoing HD, patients receiving HDF experienced a reduction in all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and infection-related mortality. These results provide compelling evidence supporting the use of HDF as a beneficial intervention in ESKD patients undergoing KRT.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>Registered at PROSPERO: CRD42023438362.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"6 6","pages":"Article 100829"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000402/pdfft?md5=e3c3711e7e84ef736a4090316fd2ad24&pid=1-s2.0-S2590059524000402-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale & Objective

The use of hemodiafiltration (HDF) as a kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) has sparked a debate regarding its advantages over conventional hemodialysis (HD). The present study aims to shed light on this controversy by comparing mortality rates and cause-specific deaths between ESKD patients receiving HDF and those undergoing HD.

Study Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central on July 1, 2023.

Setting & Participants

Adult patients with ESKD on regular KRT.

Exposure

Studies with participants undergoing HDF.

Outcomes

Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, deaths related to infections, and kidney transplant. We also evaluated the endpoints for deaths related to malignancy, myocardial infarction, stroke, arrhythmias, and sudden death.

Analytical Approach

We included RCTs evaluating HDF versus HD. Crossover trials and studies with overlapping populations were excluded. Two authors independently extracted the data following predefined search criteria and quality assessment. The risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane’s RoB2 tool.

Results

We included 5 RCTs with 4,143 patients, of which 2,078 (50.1%) underwent HDF, whereas 2,065 (49.8%) were receiving HD. Overall, HDF was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.91; P < 0.001; I2 = 7%) and a lower risk of CV-related deaths (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92; P = 0.007; I2 = 0%). The incidence of infection-related deaths was also significantly different between therapies (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.95; P = 0.02; I2 = 26%).

Limitations

In individual studies, the HDF groups achieved varying levels of convection volume.

Conclusions

Compared with those undergoing HD, patients receiving HDF experienced a reduction in all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and infection-related mortality. These results provide compelling evidence supporting the use of HDF as a beneficial intervention in ESKD patients undergoing KRT.

Registration

Registered at PROSPERO: CRD42023438362.

终末期肾病中的血液滤过与血液透析:系统回顾和元分析
基本原理与amp; Objective在终末期肾病(ESKD)患者中使用血液滤过(HDF)作为肾脏替代疗法(KRT)引发了有关其优于传统血液透析(HD)的争论。本研究旨在通过比较接受 HDF 和接受 HD 的 ESKD 患者的死亡率和特定病因死亡来揭示这一争议。结果主要结果为全因死亡率、心血管(CV)死亡率、感染相关死亡和肾移植。我们还评估了与恶性肿瘤、心肌梗死、中风、心律失常和猝死相关的死亡终点。分析方法我们纳入了评估 HDF 与 HD 的 RCT。排除了交叉试验和人群重叠的研究。两位作者按照预先确定的检索标准和质量评估独立提取数据。结果我们纳入了 5 项 RCT,共有 4,143 名患者,其中 2,078 人(50.1%)接受了 HDF 治疗,2,065 人(49.8%)接受了 HD 治疗。总体而言,HDF 与较低的全因死亡风险相关(风险比 [RR],0.81;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.73-0.91;P < 0.001;I2 = 7%),与较低的心血管相关死亡风险相关(RR,0.75;95% CI,0.61-0.92;P = 0.007;I2 = 0%)。结论与接受 HD 的患者相比,接受 HDF 的患者全因死亡率、CV 死亡率和感染相关死亡率均有所下降。这些结果提供了令人信服的证据,支持将 HDF 作为对接受 KRT 的 ESKD 患者有益的干预措施。注册在 PROSPERO:CRD42023438362。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney Medicine
Kidney Medicine Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信