Attitudes to cross infection, nebuliser hygiene and antimicrobial resistance in people with cystic fibrosis: Results of an international survey

IF 2.7 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"Attitudes to cross infection, nebuliser hygiene and antimicrobial resistance in people with cystic fibrosis: Results of an international survey","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span>Respiratory infection is a major cause of disease severity in people with </span>cystic fibrosis<span> (PwCF). This project aimed to establish the CF community's opinion regarding cross infection (CI), nebuliser hygiene, </span></span>antimicrobial resistance, personal impact of microbiological findings and the role of the microbiology laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A questionnaire was completed anonymously (n = 280; PwCF (n = 128), parents (n = 123); friends/family/carers/charity personnel (n = 29)) from 13 countries. Readability scores (Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL)) were determined for CI/IP&amp;C information from six national CF charities and 21 scientific abstracts.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Respondents (72.5%) indicated knowledge of laboratory aspects of CF microbiology was important, however implications of microbiological findings on personal health/well-being were of higher importance (p &lt; 0.0001). Cross infection/infection prevention &amp; control (CI/IP&amp;C) was of highest importance (95.6% respondents) with 27.3% indicating they were not given adequate information, particularly in older respondents (50 y+) (p = 0.006) versus young adults (16-29 y) and respondents from the Middle East versus N. America (p = 0.022) and Europe (p = 0.045). Responses highlighted how CI/IP&amp;C health literacy could be enhanced. Respondents (77.3%), particularly females (p &lt; 0.0001), indicated they would increase the frequency of nebuliser </span>disinfection following guidance on infection risks/best practice, therefore an educational video was prepared. CI/IP&amp;C readability scores (mean ± sd) from CF charities (FRE 52.5 ± 10.8; FKGL 9.7 ± 2.3) were more readable (p &lt; 0.0001) than scientific abstracts (FRE 13.3 ± 11.1; FKGL 16.9 ± 2.3), however not meeting the targets (FRE≥60 and FKGL≤8).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a requirement for further CI/IP&amp;C evidence-based guidance, policies/guidelines, education awareness, best practice in the home environment and multi-modal communication, enabling the CF community to make informed choices on lifestyle behaviours.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45006,"journal":{"name":"Infection Disease & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Disease & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468045124000245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Respiratory infection is a major cause of disease severity in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). This project aimed to establish the CF community's opinion regarding cross infection (CI), nebuliser hygiene, antimicrobial resistance, personal impact of microbiological findings and the role of the microbiology laboratory.

Methods

A questionnaire was completed anonymously (n = 280; PwCF (n = 128), parents (n = 123); friends/family/carers/charity personnel (n = 29)) from 13 countries. Readability scores (Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL)) were determined for CI/IP&C information from six national CF charities and 21 scientific abstracts.

Results

Respondents (72.5%) indicated knowledge of laboratory aspects of CF microbiology was important, however implications of microbiological findings on personal health/well-being were of higher importance (p < 0.0001). Cross infection/infection prevention & control (CI/IP&C) was of highest importance (95.6% respondents) with 27.3% indicating they were not given adequate information, particularly in older respondents (50 y+) (p = 0.006) versus young adults (16-29 y) and respondents from the Middle East versus N. America (p = 0.022) and Europe (p = 0.045). Responses highlighted how CI/IP&C health literacy could be enhanced. Respondents (77.3%), particularly females (p < 0.0001), indicated they would increase the frequency of nebuliser disinfection following guidance on infection risks/best practice, therefore an educational video was prepared. CI/IP&C readability scores (mean ± sd) from CF charities (FRE 52.5 ± 10.8; FKGL 9.7 ± 2.3) were more readable (p < 0.0001) than scientific abstracts (FRE 13.3 ± 11.1; FKGL 16.9 ± 2.3), however not meeting the targets (FRE≥60 and FKGL≤8).

Conclusion

There is a requirement for further CI/IP&C evidence-based guidance, policies/guidelines, education awareness, best practice in the home environment and multi-modal communication, enabling the CF community to make informed choices on lifestyle behaviours.

囊性纤维化患者对交叉感染、雾化器卫生和抗菌药耐药性的态度:一项国际调查的结果。
背景呼吸道感染是导致囊性纤维化患者(PwCF)病情严重的主要原因。该项目旨在了解囊性纤维化患者群体对交叉感染 (CI)、雾化器卫生、抗菌素耐药性、微生物学发现对个人的影响以及微生物学实验室的作用的看法。方法来自 13 个国家的 280 名囊性纤维化患者(n = 128)、父母(n = 123)、朋友/家人/护理人员/慈善机构工作人员(n = 29)匿名填写了一份调查问卷。对来自 6 个国家 CF 慈善机构的 CI/IP&C 信息和 21 篇科学摘要进行了可读性评分(Flesch 阅读容易度 (FRE)、Flesch Kincaid 等级 (FKGL))。结果受访者(72.5%)表示,CF 微生物学实验室方面的知识很重要,但微生物学研究结果对个人健康/福祉的影响更为重要(p < 0.0001)。交叉感染/感染预防与控制(CI/IP&C)的重要性最高(95.6% 的受访者),27.3% 的受访者表示他们没有获得足够的信息,尤其是在老年受访者(50 岁以上)(p = 0.006)与年轻人(16-29 岁)、中东受访者与北美受访者(p = 0.022)和欧洲受访者(p = 0.045)之间。答复强调了如何提高 CI/IP&C 健康素养。受访者(77.3%),尤其是女性(p <0.0001)表示,在获得感染风险/最佳实践指导后,她们会增加雾化器消毒的频率,因此我们准备了一段教育视频。与科学摘要(FRE 13.3 ± 11.1; FKGL 16.9 ± 2.3)相比,CF 慈善机构的 CI/IP&C 可读性评分(平均值 ± sd)(FRE 52.5 ± 10.8; FKGL 9.7 ± 2.3)更具可读性(p < 0.0001),但未达到目标(FRE≥60 和 FKGL≤8)。结论需要进一步制定以 CI/IP&C 为基础的循证指导、政策/指南、教育意识、家庭环境中的最佳实践和多模式交流,使 CF 社区能够在生活方式行为方面做出明智的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection Disease & Health
Infection Disease & Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The journal aims to be a platform for the publication and dissemination of knowledge in the area of infection and disease causing infection in humans. The journal is quarterly and publishes research, reviews, concise communications, commentary and other articles concerned with infection and disease affecting the health of an individual, organisation or population. The original and important articles in the journal investigate, report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonoses; and vaccination related to disease in human health. Infection, Disease & Health provides a platform for the publication and dissemination of original knowledge at the nexus of the areas infection, Disease and health in a One Health context. One Health recognizes that the health of people is connected to the health of animals and the environment. One Health encourages and advances the collaborative efforts of multiple disciplines-working locally, nationally, and globally-to achieve the best health for people, animals, and our environment. This approach is fundamental because 6 out of every 10 infectious diseases in humans are zoonotic, or spread from animals. We would be expected to report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonosis; and vaccination related to disease in human health. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in this ever-changing field. The audience of the journal includes researchers, clinicians, health workers and public policy professionals concerned with infection, disease and health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信