Brazil-TNT: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by FOLFIRINOX Versus Chemoradiation for Stage II/III Rectal Cancer

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
{"title":"Brazil-TNT: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by FOLFIRINOX Versus Chemoradiation for Stage II/III Rectal Cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Neoadjuvant radiation and oxaliplatin-based systemic therapy (total neoadjuvant therapy—TNT) have been shown to increase response and organ-preservation rates in localized rectal cancer<span>. However, trials have been heterogeneous regarding treatment protocols and few have used a watch-and-wait (WW) approach for complete responders. This trial evaluates if conventional long-term chemoradiation followed by consolidation of FOLFIRINOX increases complete response rates and the number of patients managed by WW.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a pragmatic randomized phase II trial conducted in 2 Cancer Centers in Brazil that included patients with T3+ or N+ rectal adenocarcinoma<span><span>. After completing a long-course 54 Gy chemoradiation<span><span><span> with capecitabine patients were randomized 1:1 to 4 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX (Oxaliplatin 85, </span>irinotecan 150, 5-FU 2400)—TNT-arm—or to the control arm, that did not include further neoadjuvant treatment. All patients were re-staged with dedicated </span>pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and </span></span>sigmoidoscopy 12 weeks after the end of radiation. Patients with a clinical complete response were followed using a WW protocol. The primary endpoint was complete response: clinical complete response (cCR) or pathological response (pCR).</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Between April 2021 and June 2023, 55 patients were randomized to TNT and 53 to the control arm. Tumors were 74% stage 3, median distance from the anal verge was 6 cm, 63% had an at-risk circumferential margin, and 33% an involved sphincter. The rates of cCR + pCR were (31%) for TNT versus (17%) for controls (odds ratio 2.19, CI 95% 0.8-6.22 </span><em>P</em> = .091) and rates of WW were 16% and 9% (<em>P</em> = ns). Median follow-up was 8.1 months and recurrence rates were 16% versus 21% for TNT and controls (<em>P</em> = ns).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>TNT with consolidation FOLFIRINOX is feasible and has high response rates, consistent with the current literature for TNT. This trial was supported by a grant from the Brazilian Government (PROADI-SUS - NUP 25000.164382/2020-81).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002824000264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Neoadjuvant radiation and oxaliplatin-based systemic therapy (total neoadjuvant therapy—TNT) have been shown to increase response and organ-preservation rates in localized rectal cancer. However, trials have been heterogeneous regarding treatment protocols and few have used a watch-and-wait (WW) approach for complete responders. This trial evaluates if conventional long-term chemoradiation followed by consolidation of FOLFIRINOX increases complete response rates and the number of patients managed by WW.

Methods

This was a pragmatic randomized phase II trial conducted in 2 Cancer Centers in Brazil that included patients with T3+ or N+ rectal adenocarcinoma. After completing a long-course 54 Gy chemoradiation with capecitabine patients were randomized 1:1 to 4 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX (Oxaliplatin 85, irinotecan 150, 5-FU 2400)—TNT-arm—or to the control arm, that did not include further neoadjuvant treatment. All patients were re-staged with dedicated pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and sigmoidoscopy 12 weeks after the end of radiation. Patients with a clinical complete response were followed using a WW protocol. The primary endpoint was complete response: clinical complete response (cCR) or pathological response (pCR).

Results

Between April 2021 and June 2023, 55 patients were randomized to TNT and 53 to the control arm. Tumors were 74% stage 3, median distance from the anal verge was 6 cm, 63% had an at-risk circumferential margin, and 33% an involved sphincter. The rates of cCR + pCR were (31%) for TNT versus (17%) for controls (odds ratio 2.19, CI 95% 0.8-6.22 P = .091) and rates of WW were 16% and 9% (P = ns). Median follow-up was 8.1 months and recurrence rates were 16% versus 21% for TNT and controls (P = ns).

Conclusions

TNT with consolidation FOLFIRINOX is feasible and has high response rates, consistent with the current literature for TNT. This trial was supported by a grant from the Brazilian Government (PROADI-SUS - NUP 25000.164382/2020-81).

巴西-TNT:新辅助化疗后 FOLFIRINOX 与化疗治疗 II/III 期直肠癌的随机 2 期试验
背景新辅助放疗和以奥沙利铂为基础的全身治疗(全新辅助治疗-TNT)已被证明可提高局部直肠癌的反应率和器官保留率。然而,有关治疗方案的试验各不相同,很少有试验对完全应答者采用观察和等待(WW)方法。本试验评估了传统的长期化疗后巩固FOLFIRINOX是否能提高完全反应率,以及采用观察-等待(WW)方法治疗的患者人数。这是一项在巴西两家癌症中心进行的实用随机II期试验,纳入了T3+或N+直肠腺癌患者。患者在完成卡培他滨长疗程54 Gy化放疗后,按1:1随机分配到4个周期的mFOLFIRINOX(奥沙利铂85、伊立替康150、5-FU 2400)- TNT-治疗组或对照组,后者不包括进一步的新辅助治疗。所有患者均在放射治疗结束 12 周后接受专门的盆腔磁共振成像和乙状结肠镜检查,重新分期。临床完全反应患者采用WW方案进行随访。主要终点是完全反应:临床完全反应(cCR)或病理反应(pCR)。结果在2021年4月至2023年6月期间,55名患者随机接受了TNT治疗,53名患者接受了对照组治疗。74%的肿瘤为3期,距离肛门边缘的中位距离为6厘米,63%的肿瘤周缘有风险,33%的肿瘤累及括约肌。TNT 的 cCR + pCR 率为(31%),而对照组为(17%)(几率比 2.19,CI 95% 0.8-6.22 P = .091),WW 率分别为 16% 和 9%(P = ns)。中位随访时间为 8.1 个月,TNT 和对照组的复发率分别为 16% 和 21% (P = ns)。该试验得到了巴西政府的资助(PROADI-SUS - NUP 25000.164382/2020-81)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信