A pilot cross-sectional study of non-communicable diseases in TB household contacts

Y. Hamada, A. Lugendo, T. Ntshiqa, G. Kubeka, J.M. Lalashowi, S. Mwastaula, K. Ntshamane, I. Sabi, S. Wilson, A. Copas, K. Velen, N. Ntinginya, L. T. Minja, I. Abubakar, S. Charalambous, M.X. Rangaka
{"title":"A pilot cross-sectional study of non-communicable diseases in TB household contacts","authors":"Y. Hamada, A. Lugendo, T. Ntshiqa, G. Kubeka, J.M. Lalashowi, S. Mwastaula, K. Ntshamane, I. Sabi, S. Wilson, A. Copas, K. Velen, N. Ntinginya, L. T. Minja, I. Abubakar, S. Charalambous, M.X. Rangaka","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDData on the prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in TB household contacts (HHCs) are limited, yet important to inform integrated screening and care for NCD within contact investigations. It is also unclear if screening\n these contacts reveals more people with NCDs than individuals in the same neighbourhood.METHODWe conducted a pilot cross-sectional study in South Africa and Tanzania, enrolling adult HHCs of TB and individuals in neighbourhood\n households (controls). We inquired about known NCD and systematically measured blood pressure, and tested for spot blood glucose and haemoglobin A1c.RESULTSWe enrolled 203 adult contacts of 111 persons with TB and 160 controls.\n Among contacts, respectively 12.2% (95% CI 8.3–17.6) and 39.7% (95% CI 33.1–46.7) had diabetes and hypertension, compared to 14.1% (95% CI 9.2–21.0) and 44.7% (95% CI 36.9–52.7) among controls. More than half of NCDs were newly identified. We did not find a significant\n difference in the prevalence of at least one NCD between the two groups (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.50–1.45, adjusted for age and sex).CONCLUSIONSWe found a high prevalence of undiagnosed NCDs among contacts, suggesting a potential\n benefit of integrating NCD screening and care within contact investigations. Screening in the same community might similarly find undiagnosed NCDs.","PeriodicalId":516613,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD OPEN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD OPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUNDData on the prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in TB household contacts (HHCs) are limited, yet important to inform integrated screening and care for NCD within contact investigations. It is also unclear if screening these contacts reveals more people with NCDs than individuals in the same neighbourhood.METHODWe conducted a pilot cross-sectional study in South Africa and Tanzania, enrolling adult HHCs of TB and individuals in neighbourhood households (controls). We inquired about known NCD and systematically measured blood pressure, and tested for spot blood glucose and haemoglobin A1c.RESULTSWe enrolled 203 adult contacts of 111 persons with TB and 160 controls. Among contacts, respectively 12.2% (95% CI 8.3–17.6) and 39.7% (95% CI 33.1–46.7) had diabetes and hypertension, compared to 14.1% (95% CI 9.2–21.0) and 44.7% (95% CI 36.9–52.7) among controls. More than half of NCDs were newly identified. We did not find a significant difference in the prevalence of at least one NCD between the two groups (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.50–1.45, adjusted for age and sex).CONCLUSIONSWe found a high prevalence of undiagnosed NCDs among contacts, suggesting a potential benefit of integrating NCD screening and care within contact investigations. Screening in the same community might similarly find undiagnosed NCDs.
结核病家庭接触者非传染性疾病横断面试点研究
背景有关肺结核家庭接触者(HHC)中非传染性疾病(NCD)患病率的数据非常有限,但这些数据对于在接触者调查中进行 NCD 综合筛查和护理非常重要。我们在南非和坦桑尼亚开展了一项试验性横断面研究,招募了成年肺结核家庭接触者和邻近家庭的个人(对照组)。我们询问了已知的非传染性疾病,系统地测量了血压,并检测了定点血糖和血红蛋白 A1c。结果 我们招募了 111 名肺结核患者的 203 名成年接触者和 160 名对照者。在接触者中,分别有 12.2% (95% CI 8.3-17.6) 和 39.7% (95% CI 33.1-46.7)患有糖尿病和高血压,而在对照者中,分别有 14.1% (95% CI 9.2-21.0) 和 44.7% (95% CI 36.9-52.7)患有糖尿病和高血压。超过一半的非传染性疾病是新发现的。我们发现接触者中未确诊的 NCD 发病率很高,这表明将 NCD 筛查和护理整合到接触者调查中具有潜在的益处。在同一社区进行筛查也可能发现未确诊的非传染性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信