Y. Hamada, A. Lugendo, T. Ntshiqa, G. Kubeka, J.M. Lalashowi, S. Mwastaula, K. Ntshamane, I. Sabi, S. Wilson, A. Copas, K. Velen, N. Ntinginya, L. T. Minja, I. Abubakar, S. Charalambous, M.X. Rangaka
{"title":"A pilot cross-sectional study of non-communicable diseases in TB household contacts","authors":"Y. Hamada, A. Lugendo, T. Ntshiqa, G. Kubeka, J.M. Lalashowi, S. Mwastaula, K. Ntshamane, I. Sabi, S. Wilson, A. Copas, K. Velen, N. Ntinginya, L. T. Minja, I. Abubakar, S. Charalambous, M.X. Rangaka","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDData on the prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in TB household contacts (HHCs) are limited, yet important to inform integrated screening and care for NCD within contact investigations. It is also unclear if screening\n these contacts reveals more people with NCDs than individuals in the same neighbourhood.METHODWe conducted a pilot cross-sectional study in South Africa and Tanzania, enrolling adult HHCs of TB and individuals in neighbourhood\n households (controls). We inquired about known NCD and systematically measured blood pressure, and tested for spot blood glucose and haemoglobin A1c.RESULTSWe enrolled 203 adult contacts of 111 persons with TB and 160 controls.\n Among contacts, respectively 12.2% (95% CI 8.3–17.6) and 39.7% (95% CI 33.1–46.7) had diabetes and hypertension, compared to 14.1% (95% CI 9.2–21.0) and 44.7% (95% CI 36.9–52.7) among controls. More than half of NCDs were newly identified. We did not find a significant\n difference in the prevalence of at least one NCD between the two groups (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.50–1.45, adjusted for age and sex).CONCLUSIONSWe found a high prevalence of undiagnosed NCDs among contacts, suggesting a potential\n benefit of integrating NCD screening and care within contact investigations. Screening in the same community might similarly find undiagnosed NCDs.","PeriodicalId":516613,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD OPEN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD OPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.23.0579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUNDData on the prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in TB household contacts (HHCs) are limited, yet important to inform integrated screening and care for NCD within contact investigations. It is also unclear if screening
these contacts reveals more people with NCDs than individuals in the same neighbourhood.METHODWe conducted a pilot cross-sectional study in South Africa and Tanzania, enrolling adult HHCs of TB and individuals in neighbourhood
households (controls). We inquired about known NCD and systematically measured blood pressure, and tested for spot blood glucose and haemoglobin A1c.RESULTSWe enrolled 203 adult contacts of 111 persons with TB and 160 controls.
Among contacts, respectively 12.2% (95% CI 8.3–17.6) and 39.7% (95% CI 33.1–46.7) had diabetes and hypertension, compared to 14.1% (95% CI 9.2–21.0) and 44.7% (95% CI 36.9–52.7) among controls. More than half of NCDs were newly identified. We did not find a significant
difference in the prevalence of at least one NCD between the two groups (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.50–1.45, adjusted for age and sex).CONCLUSIONSWe found a high prevalence of undiagnosed NCDs among contacts, suggesting a potential
benefit of integrating NCD screening and care within contact investigations. Screening in the same community might similarly find undiagnosed NCDs.