{"title":"Acid–base physiology","authors":"Mohamed Abdelmotieleb, Andrew Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.mpaic.2024.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The traditional approach to acid–base physiology is based on the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation which is derived from the CO<sub>2</sub>/HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> buffer system. It is becoming increasingly recognized that this is an incomplete analysis, as it focuses on only one of the six reactions involving H<sup>+</sup>. It can lead to the incorrect assumption that CO<sub>2</sub> and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> are independently adjusted factors, that ultimately determine pH. In 1983, Peter Stewart, a Canadian physiologist, proposed that a fuller understanding of acid–base physiology required consideration of biological fluids as a complex dynamic system, with the interactions of all the chemical species involved considered. He showed that the true independent variables controlling the pH of any given fluid compartment are the difference in the concentration of ‘strong ions’; the total concentration of ‘weak acid’; and the PCO<sub>2</sub>. Importantly, H<sup>+</sup> and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> are dependent variables and it is incorrect to think of them as being specifically regulated to manipulate pH. This review will discuss the importance of pH homeostasis and highlight the implications of the Stewart approach in our understanding of acid–base control mechanisms and disorders. In particular, the true mechanisms by which the kidney regulates plasma pH will be discussed, emphasizing key misconceptions that have been propagated because of the traditional approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45856,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"Pages 327-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472029924000468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The traditional approach to acid–base physiology is based on the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation which is derived from the CO2/HCO3- buffer system. It is becoming increasingly recognized that this is an incomplete analysis, as it focuses on only one of the six reactions involving H+. It can lead to the incorrect assumption that CO2 and HCO3- are independently adjusted factors, that ultimately determine pH. In 1983, Peter Stewart, a Canadian physiologist, proposed that a fuller understanding of acid–base physiology required consideration of biological fluids as a complex dynamic system, with the interactions of all the chemical species involved considered. He showed that the true independent variables controlling the pH of any given fluid compartment are the difference in the concentration of ‘strong ions’; the total concentration of ‘weak acid’; and the PCO2. Importantly, H+ and HCO3- are dependent variables and it is incorrect to think of them as being specifically regulated to manipulate pH. This review will discuss the importance of pH homeostasis and highlight the implications of the Stewart approach in our understanding of acid–base control mechanisms and disorders. In particular, the true mechanisms by which the kidney regulates plasma pH will be discussed, emphasizing key misconceptions that have been propagated because of the traditional approach.
期刊介绍:
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, an invaluable source of up-to-date information, with the curriculum of both the Primary and Final FRCA examinations covered over a three-year cycle. Published monthly this ever-updating text book will be an invaluable source for both trainee and experienced anaesthetists. The enthusiastic editorial board, under the guidance of two eminent and experienced series editors, ensures Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine covers all the key topics in a comprehensive and authoritative manner. Articles now include learning objectives and eash issue features MCQs, facilitating self-directed learning and enabling readers at all levels to test their knowledge. Each issue is divided between basic scientific and clinical sections. The basic science articles include anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, physics and clinical measurement, while the clinical sections cover anaesthetic agents and techniques, assessment and perioperative management. Further sections cover audit, trials, statistics, ethical and legal medicine, and the management of acute and chronic pain.