Recruiters’ beliefs regarding the employability of native and non-native English-speaking tertiary-level teachers: The case of public universities in Thailand

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Pariwat Thararuedee, Sita Musigrungsi
{"title":"Recruiters’ beliefs regarding the employability of native and non-native English-speaking tertiary-level teachers: The case of public universities in Thailand","authors":"Pariwat Thararuedee,&nbsp;Sita Musigrungsi","doi":"10.1016/j.amper.2024.100172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This mixed-method study explores the criteria that recruiters in Thai public universities consider important when hiring English language teachers and the importance they attach to the native speaker criterion. The data were collected through an online questionnaire with ninety-four recruiters and semi-structured interviews with ten recruiters. The questionnaire data revealed that the participants considered ten criteria important, including English language proficiency, performance in an interview, teaching demonstration, educational background, teaching qualification, area of academic expertise, application documents, pronunciation, teaching experience, and visa status. Moreover, the participants viewed the native speaker criterion as somewhat important. The interview data yielded rich data about the thinking behind the use of the criteria. Particularly, it showed different positions towards the native speaker criterion, ranging from the strong preference towards native English-speaking candidates to the rejection of the native/non-native dichotomy which favors the competent bi-/multilingual speaker of English as a target and pedagogical model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35076,"journal":{"name":"Ampersand","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039024000109/pdfft?md5=70cf8b3d2369a346e5b53733993dbde2&pid=1-s2.0-S2215039024000109-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ampersand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039024000109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This mixed-method study explores the criteria that recruiters in Thai public universities consider important when hiring English language teachers and the importance they attach to the native speaker criterion. The data were collected through an online questionnaire with ninety-four recruiters and semi-structured interviews with ten recruiters. The questionnaire data revealed that the participants considered ten criteria important, including English language proficiency, performance in an interview, teaching demonstration, educational background, teaching qualification, area of academic expertise, application documents, pronunciation, teaching experience, and visa status. Moreover, the participants viewed the native speaker criterion as somewhat important. The interview data yielded rich data about the thinking behind the use of the criteria. Particularly, it showed different positions towards the native speaker criterion, ranging from the strong preference towards native English-speaking candidates to the rejection of the native/non-native dichotomy which favors the competent bi-/multilingual speaker of English as a target and pedagogical model.

招聘人员对母语为英语和非母语为英语的高等教育教师就业能力的看法:泰国公立大学的案例
这项混合方法研究探讨了泰国公立大学招聘人员在聘用英语教师时所考虑的重要标准,以及他们对母语为英语的标准的重视程度。数据是通过对九十四位招聘人员进行在线问卷调查和对十位招聘人员进行半结构化访谈收集的。问卷数据显示,参与者认为十项标准非常重要,包括英语语言能力、面试表现、教学示范、教育背景、教学资格、学术专长领域、申请材料、发音、教学经验和签证状态。此外,受试者还认为母语为英语的标准有些重要。访谈数据提供了有关使用这些标准背后的思考的丰富数据。特别是,访谈数据显示了对以英语为母语者标准的不同立场,有的强烈倾向于以英语为母语的候选人,有的则反对母语/非母语二分法,倾向于将有能力的双语/多语英语使用者作为目标和教学模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ampersand
Ampersand Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信