Definitive internal fracture fixation followed by staged free flap coverage (“fix followed by flap” protocol) for open Gustilo type IIIB fractures

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Masahiro Nishida , Satoru Kamekura , Izumi Nakada , Manami Kiriyama , Chihiro Maeda , Ei Ozone , Takahiro Goto
{"title":"Definitive internal fracture fixation followed by staged free flap coverage (“fix followed by flap” protocol) for open Gustilo type IIIB fractures","authors":"Masahiro Nishida ,&nbsp;Satoru Kamekura ,&nbsp;Izumi Nakada ,&nbsp;Manami Kiriyama ,&nbsp;Chihiro Maeda ,&nbsp;Ei Ozone ,&nbsp;Takahiro Goto","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2024.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although the concept of the “fix and flap” approach, in which definitive fracture fixation and flap coverage are completed in a single procedure at the earliest opportunity may seem ideal for the treatment of Gustilo type IIIB open fractures, the individual circumstances of patients, such as polytrauma or multiple fracture cases may not allow for the immediate fracture fixation and flap coverage (“fix and flap” approach). In our hospital, patients with Gustilo type IIIB open fractures are treated with definitive internal fixation of the fracture followed by staged flap coverage (“fix followed by flap” protocol) when the “fix and flap” approach was not feasible due to the patient's condition or difficulty in coordinating surgery schedules. The “fix followed by flap” protocol provides benefits in terms of flexibility in adjusting the surgical timetable, simplifying the planning of flap coverage following fracture fixation, and minimizing individual surgical invasion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We reviewed 10 cases of severe open fractures treated with the “fix followed by flap” protocol and evaluated their outcomes. All surgical procedures, including wound debridement, fracture fixation, and flap coverage, were performed by orthoplastic surgeons specializing in both fracture surgery and microsurgery including soft tissue reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All free flaps survived, and no partial necrosis was observed. None of the patients developed postoperative deep infection up to the last follow-up. Fracture union was achieved in all patients with or without autologous bone grafts. The median time for union was 9.4 months (range, 4–12 months).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study presents favorable outcomes of treatment for Gustilo type IIIB open fractures with fracture fixation followed by staged flap coverage (“fix followed by flap” protocol). Despite a delay in flap coverage, the consistency of treatment provided by orthoplastic surgeons may have contributed to the favorable outcomes in this study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":"30 1","pages":"Pages 142-146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0949265824000514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although the concept of the “fix and flap” approach, in which definitive fracture fixation and flap coverage are completed in a single procedure at the earliest opportunity may seem ideal for the treatment of Gustilo type IIIB open fractures, the individual circumstances of patients, such as polytrauma or multiple fracture cases may not allow for the immediate fracture fixation and flap coverage (“fix and flap” approach). In our hospital, patients with Gustilo type IIIB open fractures are treated with definitive internal fixation of the fracture followed by staged flap coverage (“fix followed by flap” protocol) when the “fix and flap” approach was not feasible due to the patient's condition or difficulty in coordinating surgery schedules. The “fix followed by flap” protocol provides benefits in terms of flexibility in adjusting the surgical timetable, simplifying the planning of flap coverage following fracture fixation, and minimizing individual surgical invasion.

Methods

We reviewed 10 cases of severe open fractures treated with the “fix followed by flap” protocol and evaluated their outcomes. All surgical procedures, including wound debridement, fracture fixation, and flap coverage, were performed by orthoplastic surgeons specializing in both fracture surgery and microsurgery including soft tissue reconstruction.

Results

All free flaps survived, and no partial necrosis was observed. None of the patients developed postoperative deep infection up to the last follow-up. Fracture union was achieved in all patients with or without autologous bone grafts. The median time for union was 9.4 months (range, 4–12 months).

Conclusions

This study presents favorable outcomes of treatment for Gustilo type IIIB open fractures with fracture fixation followed by staged flap coverage (“fix followed by flap” protocol). Despite a delay in flap coverage, the consistency of treatment provided by orthoplastic surgeons may have contributed to the favorable outcomes in this study.
对开放性古斯蒂洛 IIIB 型骨折进行明确的骨折内固定,然后分阶段进行游离皮瓣覆盖("先固定后皮瓣 "方案)。
背景:虽然“固定皮瓣”入路的概念,即尽早在一次手术中完成明确的骨折固定和皮瓣覆盖,似乎是治疗Gustilo IIIB型开放性骨折的理想方法,但患者的个人情况,如多发创伤或多发骨折病例,可能不允许立即进行骨折固定和皮瓣覆盖(“固定皮瓣”入路)。在我院,Gustilo IIIB型开放性骨折患者,由于患者的病情或难以协调手术时间表,“固定+皮瓣”方法不可行的情况下,采用骨折内固定后分阶段皮瓣覆盖(“固定+皮瓣”方案)。“先固定后皮瓣”方案在灵活调整手术时间表、简化骨折固定后皮瓣覆盖计划和最大限度地减少个体手术侵犯方面提供了好处。方法对10例严重开放性骨折采用“固定后皮瓣”治疗方案进行回顾性分析,并对其疗效进行评价。所有的外科手术,包括伤口清创、骨折固定和皮瓣覆盖,都是由专门从事骨折手术和显微手术(包括软组织重建)的整形外科医生完成的。结果游离皮瓣全部成活,未见部分坏死。截至最后一次随访,所有患者均未发生术后深部感染。所有接受或不接受自体骨移植的患者均实现骨折愈合。愈合的中位时间为9.4个月(范围4-12个月)。结论采用骨折固定后分阶段皮瓣覆盖(“先固定后皮瓣”方案)治疗Gustilo IIIB型开放性骨折效果良好。尽管皮瓣覆盖延迟,但矫形外科医生提供的一致性治疗可能有助于本研究的良好结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信