Long-Term Trends in Decisional Regret Among Men with Localized Prostate Cancer

Alexandria Spellman, Vishnukamal Golla, Li Lin, Aaron Katz, Ronald C. Chen, Leah L. Zullig
{"title":"Long-Term Trends in Decisional Regret Among Men with Localized Prostate Cancer","authors":"Alexandria Spellman, Vishnukamal Golla, Li Lin, Aaron Katz, Ronald C. Chen, Leah L. Zullig","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n There are several evidence-based treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Decisional regret (DR), or regret based on the treatment a patient chooses, is poorly understood in patients with PCa. We describe long-term trends in DR for patients with localized PCa and factors associated with regret.\n \n \n \n We surveyed an established prospective cohort of patients with PCa in North Carolina who were diagnosed between 2011 and 2013. DR was assessed by a validated instrument at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 120 months after treatment or active surveillance (AS). We estimated the overall trend of DR and examined how DR was associated with treatment and demographic data using generalized linear mixed-model regressions.\n \n \n \n The sample included 1456 men. At 12 months, 88% (n = 1100) of patients did not regret their treatment. With all time points included, DR increased slightly in early months and the speed of increase slowed over time (P = .003 for time, .02 for time-squared). Divorced men were more likely to have DR compared with married men (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-2.7). African Americans (OR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.0-2.1) and those who underwent surgery had significantly more regret (14.6%; 95% CI 11.3-18.0, P = .01) than patients of other racial groups or who underwent AS, respectively.\n \n \n \n Although DR is low overall in this cohort, being married and AS were associated with lower regret than those who were not married or who underwent surgery, respectively. Understanding factors that affect DR can guide urologists to more effectively direct resources and counseling.\n","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":"62 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are several evidence-based treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Decisional regret (DR), or regret based on the treatment a patient chooses, is poorly understood in patients with PCa. We describe long-term trends in DR for patients with localized PCa and factors associated with regret. We surveyed an established prospective cohort of patients with PCa in North Carolina who were diagnosed between 2011 and 2013. DR was assessed by a validated instrument at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 120 months after treatment or active surveillance (AS). We estimated the overall trend of DR and examined how DR was associated with treatment and demographic data using generalized linear mixed-model regressions. The sample included 1456 men. At 12 months, 88% (n = 1100) of patients did not regret their treatment. With all time points included, DR increased slightly in early months and the speed of increase slowed over time (P = .003 for time, .02 for time-squared). Divorced men were more likely to have DR compared with married men (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-2.7). African Americans (OR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.0-2.1) and those who underwent surgery had significantly more regret (14.6%; 95% CI 11.3-18.0, P = .01) than patients of other racial groups or who underwent AS, respectively. Although DR is low overall in this cohort, being married and AS were associated with lower regret than those who were not married or who underwent surgery, respectively. Understanding factors that affect DR can guide urologists to more effectively direct resources and counseling.
局部前列腺癌男性患者后悔决策的长期趋势
针对局部前列腺癌(PCa)有多种循证治疗方案。人们对 PCa 患者的决策后悔(DR),即基于患者选择的治疗方案而产生的后悔,知之甚少。我们描述了局部 PCa 患者 DR 的长期趋势以及与遗憾相关的因素。 我们对北卡罗来纳州 2011 年至 2013 年期间确诊的 PCa 患者建立的前瞻性队列进行了调查。在治疗或主动监测(AS)后的 12、24、36、48、60、72、84 和 120 个月,我们使用一种经过验证的工具对 DR 进行了评估。我们估算了DR的总体趋势,并使用广义线性混合模型回归分析了DR与治疗和人口统计学数据之间的关联。 样本包括 1456 名男性。在 12 个月时,88% 的患者(n = 1100)不后悔接受治疗。在包含所有时间点的情况下,DR 在最初几个月略有上升,随着时间的推移,上升速度减慢(时间的 P = .003,时间平方的 P = .02)。与已婚男性相比,离婚男性更有可能患有DR(几率比[OR] = 1.5;95% 置信区间[CI] 0.9-2.7)。非裔美国人(OR = 1.5;95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.0-2.1)和接受过手术的患者的后悔率(14.6%;95% 置信区间 [CI] 11.3-18.0,P = .01)分别明显高于其他种族群体或接受过 AS 的患者。 虽然该队列中的后悔率总体较低,但已婚患者和接受过手术的患者的后悔率分别低于未婚患者和接受过手术的患者。了解影响DR的因素可以指导泌尿科医生更有效地引导资源和咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信