Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Eye of the Beholder and Emergency Medical Service

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Lorka Tarnovski, Porin Šantek, Ivana Rožić, Đivo Čučević, Luka Mahečić, Jana Marić, Josip Lovaković, Dejana Martinić, Fran Rasic, Žarko Rašić
{"title":"Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Eye of the Beholder and Emergency Medical Service","authors":"Lorka Tarnovski, Porin Šantek, Ivana Rožić, Đivo Čučević, Luka Mahečić, Jana Marić, Josip Lovaković, Dejana Martinić, Fran Rasic, Žarko Rašić","doi":"10.2147/oaem.s449157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a global healthcare problem, with low survival and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) rates. This study aimed to identify event-related factors in OHCA and their impact on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) achievement and maintenance until hospital admission. Patients and Methods: All data were collected from Utstein Resuscitation Registry Template for OHCA from The Institute of Emergency Medicine of Zagreb from January 2012 to August 2022. This cross-sectional research analyzed 2839 Utstein reports, including 2001 male, 836 female, and 8 subjects of unknown gender. The average age was 65.4 ± 16.2 years. Results: The most frequent place of collapse was private residence, and 27% of collapses were unwitnessed. Dispatcher-provided CPR instructions were provided in 39.7% of cases until the arrival of the emergency service team, which showed a very strong effect on bystander-provided CPR, and were followed in 68.4% of cases, while non-instructed bystander CPR was provided in only 7.9% of cases. Bystander CPR is more likely to be provided in public places than in private residences, often with both compression and ventilation. Bystander CPR was also more likely to be provided to men. Cases with bystander CPR, and compressions with ventilation compared to compression only CPR, showed a significantly greater success in maintaining ROSC later in CPR, both with moderate effects. Conclusion: Bystander CPR has been shown to have a significant role in achieving and maintaining ROSC until hospital admission. However, our results showed a location-dependent nature of bystanders’ willingness to perform CPR as well as sex disparities in patients receiving CPR. With deficient education in basic life support in Croatia, dispatchers need to insist on and instruct bystander CPR performance.","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/oaem.s449157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a global healthcare problem, with low survival and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) rates. This study aimed to identify event-related factors in OHCA and their impact on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) achievement and maintenance until hospital admission. Patients and Methods: All data were collected from Utstein Resuscitation Registry Template for OHCA from The Institute of Emergency Medicine of Zagreb from January 2012 to August 2022. This cross-sectional research analyzed 2839 Utstein reports, including 2001 male, 836 female, and 8 subjects of unknown gender. The average age was 65.4 ± 16.2 years. Results: The most frequent place of collapse was private residence, and 27% of collapses were unwitnessed. Dispatcher-provided CPR instructions were provided in 39.7% of cases until the arrival of the emergency service team, which showed a very strong effect on bystander-provided CPR, and were followed in 68.4% of cases, while non-instructed bystander CPR was provided in only 7.9% of cases. Bystander CPR is more likely to be provided in public places than in private residences, often with both compression and ventilation. Bystander CPR was also more likely to be provided to men. Cases with bystander CPR, and compressions with ventilation compared to compression only CPR, showed a significantly greater success in maintaining ROSC later in CPR, both with moderate effects. Conclusion: Bystander CPR has been shown to have a significant role in achieving and maintaining ROSC until hospital admission. However, our results showed a location-dependent nature of bystanders’ willingness to perform CPR as well as sex disparities in patients receiving CPR. With deficient education in basic life support in Croatia, dispatchers need to insist on and instruct bystander CPR performance.
院外心脏骤停与急救医疗服务
目的:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)仍然是一个全球性的医疗问题,其存活率和旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)率都很低。本研究旨在确定 OHCA 中与事件相关的因素及其对实现和维持自发性循环(ROSC)直至入院的影响。患者和方法:所有数据均来自萨格勒布急诊医学研究所 2012 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月的 OHCA Utstein 复苏注册模板。这项横断面研究分析了2839份Utstein报告,包括2001名男性、836名女性和8名性别不明的受试者。平均年龄为 65.4 ± 16.2 岁。研究结果最常见的倒地地点是私人住宅,27%的倒地事件无人目击。有 39.7% 的病例在急救小组到达前接受了调度员提供的心肺复苏指导,这对旁观者提供的心肺复苏有非常大的影响,有 68.4% 的病例遵循了这一指导,而只有 7.9% 的病例未接受旁观者心肺复苏指导。与私人住宅相比,旁观者心肺复苏术更有可能在公共场所进行,通常会同时进行按压和通气。旁观者心肺复苏术也更多地提供给男性。采用旁观者心肺复苏术和按压加通气的病例与仅采用按压心肺复苏术的病例相比,在心肺复苏术后维持 ROSC 的成功率明显更高,两者的效果均为中等。结论旁观者心肺复苏术在实现和维持 ROSC 直至入院方面具有重要作用。然而,我们的研究结果表明,旁观者实施心肺复苏的意愿与地点有关,接受心肺复苏的患者也存在性别差异。由于克罗地亚缺乏基本生命支持教育,调度员需要坚持并指导旁观者进行心肺复苏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信