The influence of innovative development in the EU countries and Ukraine on the competitiveness of national economies: A comparative analysis

Q1 Social Sciences
Viktoriia Strilets, Liudmyla Franko, Mariia Dykha, Maksym Ivanov, L. Rybina
{"title":"The influence of innovative development in the EU countries and Ukraine on the competitiveness of national economies: A comparative analysis","authors":"Viktoriia Strilets, Liudmyla Franko, Mariia Dykha, Maksym Ivanov, L. Rybina","doi":"10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russian aggression adversely affected the economy of Ukraine and emphasized the need to adapt the best practices of EU countries to determine steps to restore the country’s competitiveness. This study aims to determine the influence of the innovative development of countries on their competitiveness and identify prospects for Ukraine’s post-war economic recovery. The study constructed neural networks to assess the relationships between the factors of innovative development and the competitiveness of the EU countries and Ukraine. Six main factors of innovative development of countries are identified: “innovations in business (S1),” “intellectual property (S2)”, “innovations in industry (S3),” “eco-innovations (S4),” “innovation management (S5),” and “digital innovations (S5).” Groups of factors are determined by the strength of influence (strong, moderate, or weak). For Ukraine, S1 and S6 have a strong effect (33.3%), S5 shows moderate (16.7%), S2, S3, and S4 show weak effects (50%). For EU countries, S1 and S6 have a strong influence, S2 and S3 – moderate, S5 and S4 – weak. This comparative analysis concluded that EU countries consider intellectual property, green economy, and state innovation policy as key components of their competitiveness. The results discovered a weak relationship between intellectual property protection, innovation in industry, and competitiveness of Ukraine compared to EU countries. However, digital innovations significantly and positively affect Ukraine’s competitiveness.","PeriodicalId":20521,"journal":{"name":"Problems and perspectives in management","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems and perspectives in management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Russian aggression adversely affected the economy of Ukraine and emphasized the need to adapt the best practices of EU countries to determine steps to restore the country’s competitiveness. This study aims to determine the influence of the innovative development of countries on their competitiveness and identify prospects for Ukraine’s post-war economic recovery. The study constructed neural networks to assess the relationships between the factors of innovative development and the competitiveness of the EU countries and Ukraine. Six main factors of innovative development of countries are identified: “innovations in business (S1),” “intellectual property (S2)”, “innovations in industry (S3),” “eco-innovations (S4),” “innovation management (S5),” and “digital innovations (S5).” Groups of factors are determined by the strength of influence (strong, moderate, or weak). For Ukraine, S1 and S6 have a strong effect (33.3%), S5 shows moderate (16.7%), S2, S3, and S4 show weak effects (50%). For EU countries, S1 and S6 have a strong influence, S2 and S3 – moderate, S5 and S4 – weak. This comparative analysis concluded that EU countries consider intellectual property, green economy, and state innovation policy as key components of their competitiveness. The results discovered a weak relationship between intellectual property protection, innovation in industry, and competitiveness of Ukraine compared to EU countries. However, digital innovations significantly and positively affect Ukraine’s competitiveness.
欧盟国家和乌克兰的创新发展对国家经济竞争力的影响:比较分析
俄罗斯的侵略对乌克兰的经济造成了不利影响,并强调有必要借鉴欧盟国家的最佳做法,确定恢复国家竞争力的步骤。本研究旨在确定国家创新发展对其竞争力的影响,并确定乌克兰战后经济复苏的前景。研究构建了神经网络,以评估创新发展因素与欧盟国家和乌克兰竞争力之间的关系。研究确定了各国创新发展的六个主要因素:"企业创新(S1)"、"知识产权(S2)"、"产业创新(S3)"、"生态创新(S4)"、"创新管理(S5)"和 "数字创新(S5)"。各组因素由影响强度(强、中、弱)决定。对乌克兰而言,S1 和 S6 的影响较强(33.3%),S5 的影响适中(16.7%),S2、S3 和 S4 的影响较弱(50%)。对欧盟国家而言,S1 和 S6 的影响较大,S2 和 S3 的影响适中,S5 和 S4 的影响较弱。这项比较分析得出结论,欧盟国家认为知识产权、绿色经济和国家创新政策是其竞争力的关键组成部分。结果发现,与欧盟国家相比,乌克兰的知识产权保护、工业创新和竞争力之间的关系较弱。然而,数字创新对乌克兰的竞争力产生了重大而积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
152
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal is coverage of different aspects of management and governance, such as international organizations and communities’ management, state and regional governance, company’s management, etc. The key aspects of planning, organization, motivation and control in various areas and in different countries are subject of the journal''s scope. The journal publishes articles, which are focused on existing and new methods, techniques and approaches in the field of management. It publishes contemporary and innovative researches, including theoretical and empirical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信