Flowback Rates for Pump-In/Flowback Test

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM
SPE Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.2118/219761-pa
Rui Wang, A. Dahi Taleghani, Yuzhe Cai
{"title":"Flowback Rates for Pump-In/Flowback Test","authors":"Rui Wang, A. Dahi Taleghani, Yuzhe Cai","doi":"10.2118/219761-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The pump-in/flowback test (PIFT), often referred to as the diagnostic fracture injection test (DFIT) with flowback, offers notable advantages in terms of time efficiency and accuracy, particularly in the context of low-permeability formations. The key to the success of this test lies in the careful selection of an optimal flowback rate to yield meaningful results. The fundamental assumption underlying the pressure analysis of these tests is the uniform closure of fractures during the flowback phase, which is considered the default fracture closure mode in current analyses. In this study, we present evidence that challenges the validity of this assumption, highlighting instances where unsuitable flowback rates can lead to nonuniform fracture closure and result in abnormal pressure data. To address this challenge, we identify different closure modes through the signature of fracture closure in the excessive bottomhole pressure decline curve. Subsequently, we propose an optimal range of flowback rates using a scaling analysis approach to obtain a uniform closure mode in an extended openhole section of a vertical well. Our method has been rigorously validated through 3D numerical simulations and field studies, enhancing its reliability and applicability. This approach helps operators to conduct effective tests in complex situations, overcoming a barrier to widespread test application.","PeriodicalId":22252,"journal":{"name":"SPE Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/219761-pa","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pump-in/flowback test (PIFT), often referred to as the diagnostic fracture injection test (DFIT) with flowback, offers notable advantages in terms of time efficiency and accuracy, particularly in the context of low-permeability formations. The key to the success of this test lies in the careful selection of an optimal flowback rate to yield meaningful results. The fundamental assumption underlying the pressure analysis of these tests is the uniform closure of fractures during the flowback phase, which is considered the default fracture closure mode in current analyses. In this study, we present evidence that challenges the validity of this assumption, highlighting instances where unsuitable flowback rates can lead to nonuniform fracture closure and result in abnormal pressure data. To address this challenge, we identify different closure modes through the signature of fracture closure in the excessive bottomhole pressure decline curve. Subsequently, we propose an optimal range of flowback rates using a scaling analysis approach to obtain a uniform closure mode in an extended openhole section of a vertical well. Our method has been rigorously validated through 3D numerical simulations and field studies, enhancing its reliability and applicability. This approach helps operators to conduct effective tests in complex situations, overcoming a barrier to widespread test application.
泵入/回流测试的回流速率
泵入/回流试验(PIFT)通常被称为带回流的诊断性压裂注入试验(DFIT),在时间效率和准确性方面具有显著优势,尤其是在低渗透地层中。该测试成功的关键在于仔细选择最佳回流率,以获得有意义的结果。这些测试的压力分析所依据的基本假设是在回流阶段裂缝的均匀闭合,这在目前的分析中被认为是默认的裂缝闭合模式。在本研究中,我们提出了质疑这一假设有效性的证据,强调了不合适的回流速度会导致裂缝不均匀闭合并导致压力数据异常的情况。为了应对这一挑战,我们通过过大的井底压力下降曲线中的裂缝闭合特征来识别不同的闭合模式。随后,我们利用缩放分析方法提出了最佳回流率范围,以便在垂直井的扩展裸眼段获得均匀的闭合模式。通过三维数值模拟和现场研究,我们的方法得到了严格验证,提高了其可靠性和适用性。这种方法有助于运营商在复杂情况下进行有效测试,克服了测试广泛应用的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SPE Journal
SPE Journal 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
229
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Covers theories and emerging concepts spanning all aspects of engineering for oil and gas exploration and production, including reservoir characterization, multiphase flow, drilling dynamics, well architecture, gas well deliverability, numerical simulation, enhanced oil recovery, CO2 sequestration, and benchmarking and performance indicators.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信