COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and associated factors among medical students in Tanzania: evidence from the Catholic University of Health and Allied Science, Mwanza region

Q4 Medicine
Paul Alikado Sabuni, M. Mwangu, Thadeus Ruwaichi
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and associated factors among medical students in Tanzania: evidence from the Catholic University of Health and Allied Science, Mwanza region","authors":"Paul Alikado Sabuni, M. Mwangu, Thadeus Ruwaichi","doi":"10.4314/thrb.v25i2.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Since the outbreak of COVID-19, the government of Tanzania has made efforts and initiatives to protect its citizens. These efforts and control measures are lined with WHO guidelines and the National response plan for controlling the COVID-19 outbreak. Unlike other control measures, the Vaccine remained a promised solution to end the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study aims to determine the COVID-19 hesitancy level and associated factors among medical students. Furthermore, it aims to provide valuable insights and information that can be applied in future immunization campaigns/strategies to improve vaccination rates among this particular group of future medical professionals during the pandemic.\nMethods: This is an analytical cross-sectional survey conducted to assess the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and associated factors among 580 undergraduate medical students at the Catholic University of Health and Allied Science (CUHAS) in Mwanza region, Tanzania. Data was collected through a questionnaire and analyzed using STATA version 18.0 to extract descriptive and inferential statistics to determine the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in this particular group of future medical professionals. All the statistics were obtained at a 5% significant level.\nResults: The vaccine hesitancy was 75.6% (95% CI, 71.9%-79.2%). Thus, more than half of the medical student 54.3% do not trust the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine with AOR 2.96 (95% CI, 1.80-4.86, p-value<0.001); likewise, the safety of Vaccine AOR 0.1.89 (95% CI, 1.11-3.21, p-value=0.019). Further, students who do not prefer free riding (i.e., letting others get the vaccine and believing to get the beneficial effect of herd immunity without being vaccinated) were less likely to deny the Vaccine than those who prefer free riding AOR 0.31 (95% CI, 0.31, 0.13-0.75, p-value=0.009). Despite insignificant odds, too much politics behind the COVID-19 vaccine influences vaccine hesitancy with AOR 1.14 (95% CI, 0.61-2.15, p-value=0.676).\nConclusion: The study concludes that despite the efforts to communicate public health information to encourage people to overcome vaccine hesitancy and receive Vaccines, the reluctance to get vaccinated against COVID-19 remains higher than the acceptance rate among medical students.","PeriodicalId":39815,"journal":{"name":"Tanzania Journal of Health Research","volume":"24 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzania Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v25i2.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the outbreak of COVID-19, the government of Tanzania has made efforts and initiatives to protect its citizens. These efforts and control measures are lined with WHO guidelines and the National response plan for controlling the COVID-19 outbreak. Unlike other control measures, the Vaccine remained a promised solution to end the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study aims to determine the COVID-19 hesitancy level and associated factors among medical students. Furthermore, it aims to provide valuable insights and information that can be applied in future immunization campaigns/strategies to improve vaccination rates among this particular group of future medical professionals during the pandemic. Methods: This is an analytical cross-sectional survey conducted to assess the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and associated factors among 580 undergraduate medical students at the Catholic University of Health and Allied Science (CUHAS) in Mwanza region, Tanzania. Data was collected through a questionnaire and analyzed using STATA version 18.0 to extract descriptive and inferential statistics to determine the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in this particular group of future medical professionals. All the statistics were obtained at a 5% significant level. Results: The vaccine hesitancy was 75.6% (95% CI, 71.9%-79.2%). Thus, more than half of the medical student 54.3% do not trust the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine with AOR 2.96 (95% CI, 1.80-4.86, p-value<0.001); likewise, the safety of Vaccine AOR 0.1.89 (95% CI, 1.11-3.21, p-value=0.019). Further, students who do not prefer free riding (i.e., letting others get the vaccine and believing to get the beneficial effect of herd immunity without being vaccinated) were less likely to deny the Vaccine than those who prefer free riding AOR 0.31 (95% CI, 0.31, 0.13-0.75, p-value=0.009). Despite insignificant odds, too much politics behind the COVID-19 vaccine influences vaccine hesitancy with AOR 1.14 (95% CI, 0.61-2.15, p-value=0.676). Conclusion: The study concludes that despite the efforts to communicate public health information to encourage people to overcome vaccine hesitancy and receive Vaccines, the reluctance to get vaccinated against COVID-19 remains higher than the acceptance rate among medical students.
坦桑尼亚医科学生对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫态度及相关因素:姆万扎地区天主教卫生与联合科学大学提供的证据
背景:自 COVID-19 爆发以来,坦桑尼亚政府一直在努力采取措施保护本国公民。这些努力和控制措施符合世界卫生组织的指导方针和控制 COVID-19 爆发的国家应对计划。与其他控制措施不同,疫苗仍然是结束 COVID-19 大流行的承诺解决方案。因此,本研究旨在确定医科学生对 COVID-19 的犹豫程度及相关因素。此外,本研究还旨在提供有价值的见解和信息,这些见解和信息可应用于未来的免疫接种活动/策略中,以提高大流行期间这一特殊的未来医学专业人员群体的疫苗接种率:这是一项分析性横断面调查,旨在评估坦桑尼亚姆万扎地区天主教健康与联合科学大学(CUHAS)580 名医学本科生对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫态度及相关因素。数据通过调查问卷收集,并使用 STATA 18.0 版进行分析,提取描述性和推论性统计数据,以确定影响这一特殊群体对 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫不决的因素。所有统计数据均在 5%的显著水平下获得:疫苗犹豫率为 75.6%(95% CI,71.9%-79.2%)。因此,54.3% 的医学生不信任 COVID-19 疫苗的有效性,AOR 为 2.96 (95% CI, 1.80-4.86, p-value<0.001);同样,不信任疫苗的安全性,AOR 为 0.1.89 (95% CI, 1.11-3.21, p-value=0.019)。此外,不喜欢 "搭便车"(即让他人接种疫苗,认为不接种疫苗也能获得群体免疫的有益效果)的学生比喜欢 "搭便车 "的学生更不可能拒绝接种疫苗,相关系数为 0.31(95% CI,0.31,0.13-0.75,p 值=0.009)。尽管几率并不显著,但 COVID-19 疫苗背后过多的政治因素影响了疫苗接种的犹豫性,其 AOR 为 1.14(95% CI,0.61-2.15,p 值=0.676):本研究得出结论:尽管努力传播公共卫生信息以鼓励人们克服疫苗犹豫并接种疫苗,但医学生不愿接种 COVID-19 疫苗的比例仍高于接受率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tanzania Journal of Health Research
Tanzania Journal of Health Research Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信