Aerodynamics Analysis Comparison between NACA 4412 and NREL S823 Airfoils

Q3 Engineering
Sayel M. Fayyad, Aiman Al Alawin, S. Abu-Ein, Zaid Abulghanam, Abdel Salam Alsabag, Mohannad O. Rawashdeh, Muntaser Momani, Waleed Momani
{"title":"Aerodynamics Analysis Comparison between NACA 4412 and NREL S823 Airfoils","authors":"Sayel M. Fayyad, Aiman Al Alawin, S. Abu-Ein, Zaid Abulghanam, Abdel Salam Alsabag, Mohannad O. Rawashdeh, Muntaser Momani, Waleed Momani","doi":"10.37394/232013.2024.19.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a study of the aerodynamics of a wing or bluff bodies and compares different wing types' behavior against aerodynamic forces. NACA 4412 and NERL S823 airfoils will be analyzed numerically using the ANSYS simulation. The methodology used in this paper depends on collecting data from the last studies, studying the analyzed airfoil models, and constructing an analytical model to show the aerodynamic effects on NACA 4412 and NERL S823 airfoils, and find the total solution. A comparison between NACA 4412 airfoil and NREL'S S823 is presented. It was found that the lift coefficient for NACA 4412 values is higher than that of NREL S823 airfoil but for NACA 4412 such values are decreasing as the angle of attack (AoA) is increasing till 8ᵒ of AoA after that Cl values are increasing slightly. In contrast, for NREL S823 airfoil the values of lift coefficient (Cl) are increasing with AoA till 8ᵒ after that they become constant or slightly decreasing, while for drag coefficient, it can be noticed that values of drag coefficient (Cd) for NACA 4412 are lower than that of NREL S823 airfoils and for all values of angle of attack, also values for both airfoils are decreasing with AoA till 8° and then slightly increased.","PeriodicalId":39418,"journal":{"name":"WSEAS Transactions on Fluid Mechanics","volume":"45 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WSEAS Transactions on Fluid Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37394/232013.2024.19.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a study of the aerodynamics of a wing or bluff bodies and compares different wing types' behavior against aerodynamic forces. NACA 4412 and NERL S823 airfoils will be analyzed numerically using the ANSYS simulation. The methodology used in this paper depends on collecting data from the last studies, studying the analyzed airfoil models, and constructing an analytical model to show the aerodynamic effects on NACA 4412 and NERL S823 airfoils, and find the total solution. A comparison between NACA 4412 airfoil and NREL'S S823 is presented. It was found that the lift coefficient for NACA 4412 values is higher than that of NREL S823 airfoil but for NACA 4412 such values are decreasing as the angle of attack (AoA) is increasing till 8ᵒ of AoA after that Cl values are increasing slightly. In contrast, for NREL S823 airfoil the values of lift coefficient (Cl) are increasing with AoA till 8ᵒ after that they become constant or slightly decreasing, while for drag coefficient, it can be noticed that values of drag coefficient (Cd) for NACA 4412 are lower than that of NREL S823 airfoils and for all values of angle of attack, also values for both airfoils are decreasing with AoA till 8° and then slightly increased.
NACA 4412 和 NREL S823 翼面的空气动力学分析比较
本文介绍了机翼或崖体的空气动力学研究,并比较了不同类型机翼在空气动力作用下的行为。将使用 ANSYS 仿真对 NACA 4412 和 NERL S823 机翼进行数值分析。本文采用的方法是收集上次研究的数据,研究分析后的机翼模型,并构建一个分析模型,以显示 NACA 4412 和 NERL S823 机翼的气动效应,并找到总的解决方案。对 NACA 4412 机翼和 NREL S823 机翼进行了比较。结果发现,NACA 4412 翼面的升力系数高于 NREL S823 翼面的升力系数,但 NACA 4412 翼面的升力系数随着攻角(AoA)的增大而减小,直到 8ᵒ 的攻角之后,升力系数才略有增加。相比之下,NREL S823 翼面的升力系数(Cl)值随攻角(AoA)的增大而增大,直至 8ᵒ,之后升力系数(Cl)值保持不变或略有减小;而阻力系数方面,可以注意到 NACA 4412 翼面的阻力系数(Cd)值低于 NREL S823 翼面的阻力系数(Cd)值,而且在所有攻角值下,两种翼面的阻力系数(Cd)值都随攻角(AoA)的增大而减小,直至 8°,之后阻力系数(Cd)值略有增大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
WSEAS Transactions on Fluid Mechanics
WSEAS Transactions on Fluid Mechanics Engineering-Computational Mechanics
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: WSEAS Transactions on Fluid Mechanics publishes original research papers relating to the studying of fluids. We aim to bring important work to a wide international audience and therefore only publish papers of exceptional scientific value that advance our understanding of this particular area. The research presented must transcend the limits of case studies, while both experimental and theoretical studies are accepted. It is a multi-disciplinary journal and therefore its content mirrors the diverse interests and approaches of scholars involved with multiphase flow, boundary layer flow, material properties, wave modelling and related areas. We also welcome scholarly contributions from officials with government agencies, international agencies, and non-governmental organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信