The heart became hot

Jonathan Tanihu, S. Issah
{"title":"The heart became hot","authors":"Jonathan Tanihu, S. Issah","doi":"10.1075/ijolc.00059.iss","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper provides a comparative study of the conceptualization of ANGER in Dagbani and Dangme, classified as Mabia and Kwa languages respectively. We employ the Conceptual Metaphor Theory as an analytical tool for explaining the empirical facts on the conceptualization of anger in these languages. We show that the mental concepts of the Dangme and the Dagbani people reflect in their conceptualizations of ANGER. We demonstrate that although the two languages deploy varied body organs (especially the heart and stomach), to express anger, Dagbani tends to focus more on the use of the heart, the lungs and the chest to express anger, whereas Dangme uses the heart, stomach and the body or self. The two languages share a common conceptual metaphor of anger as ‘heat’ with other schematic nodes, such as ‘fire’, ‘fluid’ and ‘container’. We finally establish that although most of the expressions of anger in these two languages fit into cross-linguistic patterns, there are also salient cultural specifics that demonstrate how their physiological and experiential realities tend to play an important role in their conception of anger. Data for this study were collected from native speakers of these languages through spontaneous conversations as well as from literary works produced in the two languages under investigation.","PeriodicalId":502510,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language and Culture","volume":"194 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00059.iss","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides a comparative study of the conceptualization of ANGER in Dagbani and Dangme, classified as Mabia and Kwa languages respectively. We employ the Conceptual Metaphor Theory as an analytical tool for explaining the empirical facts on the conceptualization of anger in these languages. We show that the mental concepts of the Dangme and the Dagbani people reflect in their conceptualizations of ANGER. We demonstrate that although the two languages deploy varied body organs (especially the heart and stomach), to express anger, Dagbani tends to focus more on the use of the heart, the lungs and the chest to express anger, whereas Dangme uses the heart, stomach and the body or self. The two languages share a common conceptual metaphor of anger as ‘heat’ with other schematic nodes, such as ‘fire’, ‘fluid’ and ‘container’. We finally establish that although most of the expressions of anger in these two languages fit into cross-linguistic patterns, there are also salient cultural specifics that demonstrate how their physiological and experiential realities tend to play an important role in their conception of anger. Data for this study were collected from native speakers of these languages through spontaneous conversations as well as from literary works produced in the two languages under investigation.
心变得火热
本文比较研究了达格巴尼语(Dagbani)和当梅语(Dangme)中 "愤怒"(anger)的概念化,这两种语言分别被归类为马比亚语(Mabia)和夸语(Kwa)。我们采用概念隐喻理论作为分析工具,来解释这两种语言中 "愤怒 "概念化的经验事实。我们的研究表明,当梅人和达格巴尼人的心理概念反映在他们对 "愤怒 "的概念化中。我们证明,虽然两种语言都使用不同的身体器官(尤其是心脏和胃)来表达愤怒,但达格巴尼语更倾向于使用心脏、肺和胸部来表达愤怒,而当梅语则使用心脏、胃和身体或自我来表达愤怒。这两种语言有一个共同的概念隐喻,即愤怒是 "热",并带有其他图式节点,如 "火"、"液体 "和 "容器"。最后,我们确定,虽然这两种语言中大多数愤怒的表达方式都符合跨语言模式,但也有一些突出的文化特点,表明他们的生理和经验现实如何在愤怒概念中发挥重要作用。本研究的数据来自这两种语言的母语使用者的自发对话以及用这两种语言创作的文学作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信