Anti-takeover provisions, managerial overconfidence, and corporate cash holdings in Korean listed firms

Kevin Troy Chua, A-Young Lee, Hansol Lee
{"title":"Anti-takeover provisions, managerial overconfidence, and corporate cash holdings in Korean listed firms","authors":"Kevin Troy Chua, A-Young Lee, Hansol Lee","doi":"10.21511/imfi.21(2).2024.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management of an entity faces diverse decisions concerned with corporate operations and financing choices. Investigating various factors affecting a company’s cash holdings provides valuable insights into the decision-making processes of an organization. This study examines the effect of Anti-Takeover Provisions (ATPs), Managerial Overconfidence, and their interaction on the level of an entity’s cash holdings. Conducting a regression analysis, this study examines 3,409 firm-year observations from Korean listed entities covering 2011 to 2018. Results reveal that anti-takeover provisions positively influence an entity’s cash holdings (coefficient = 0.464, t-stat value = 7.83). Additionally, managerial overconfidence negatively affects cash holdings (coefficient = –0.140, t-stat value = –2.77). Furthermore, the interaction between anti-takeover provisions and managerial overconfidence significantly influences cash holdings (coefficient = –0.402, t-stat value = –3.46), especially in firms employing specific provisions such as supermajority vote requirements for executive dismissal (coefficient = –0.445, t-stat value = –2.73), issuance of convertible preferred stock (coefficient = –0.341, t-stat value = –1.76), and golden parachutes (coefficient = –0.715, t-stat value = –3.02). This study provides empirical evidence on how anti-takeover provisions and managerial traits influence corporate cash reserves. The study offers valuable insights for regulators, investors, and corporate management. It also emphasizes prudent cash management, urging firms, especially those with anti-takeover provisions and overconfident management, to reconsider financial policies to mitigate risks associated with aggressive decision-making.","PeriodicalId":507796,"journal":{"name":"Investment Management and Financial Innovations","volume":"197 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investment Management and Financial Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(2).2024.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The management of an entity faces diverse decisions concerned with corporate operations and financing choices. Investigating various factors affecting a company’s cash holdings provides valuable insights into the decision-making processes of an organization. This study examines the effect of Anti-Takeover Provisions (ATPs), Managerial Overconfidence, and their interaction on the level of an entity’s cash holdings. Conducting a regression analysis, this study examines 3,409 firm-year observations from Korean listed entities covering 2011 to 2018. Results reveal that anti-takeover provisions positively influence an entity’s cash holdings (coefficient = 0.464, t-stat value = 7.83). Additionally, managerial overconfidence negatively affects cash holdings (coefficient = –0.140, t-stat value = –2.77). Furthermore, the interaction between anti-takeover provisions and managerial overconfidence significantly influences cash holdings (coefficient = –0.402, t-stat value = –3.46), especially in firms employing specific provisions such as supermajority vote requirements for executive dismissal (coefficient = –0.445, t-stat value = –2.73), issuance of convertible preferred stock (coefficient = –0.341, t-stat value = –1.76), and golden parachutes (coefficient = –0.715, t-stat value = –3.02). This study provides empirical evidence on how anti-takeover provisions and managerial traits influence corporate cash reserves. The study offers valuable insights for regulators, investors, and corporate management. It also emphasizes prudent cash management, urging firms, especially those with anti-takeover provisions and overconfident management, to reconsider financial policies to mitigate risks associated with aggressive decision-making.
韩国上市公司的反收购条款、管理者过度自信和公司现金持有量
企业管理层面临着与企业运营和融资选择有关的各种决策。对影响公司现金持有量的各种因素进行调查,有助于深入了解企业的决策过程。本研究探讨了反收购条款(ATPs)、管理者过度自信及其相互作用对企业现金持有水平的影响。通过回归分析,本研究考察了韩国上市实体 2011 年至 2018 年的 3409 个公司年度观测值。结果显示,反收购条款会对实体的现金持有量产生积极影响(系数 = 0.464,t 统计值 = 7.83)。此外,管理者过度自信会对现金持有量产生负面影响(系数=-0.140,t-stat 值=-2.77)。此外,反收购条款与管理者过度自信之间的交互作用也会显著影响现金持有量(系数 = -0.402,t-stat 值 = -3.46),特别是在采用特定条款的公司,如解雇高管的超级多数票要求(系数 = -0.445,t-stat 值 = -3.46)。445,t-stat 值 = -2.73)、发行可转换优先股(系数 = -0.341,t-stat 值 = -1.76)和金降落伞(系数 = -0.715,t-stat 值 = -3.02)。本研究提供了反收购条款和管理者特质如何影响企业现金储备的经验证据。该研究为监管机构、投资者和企业管理层提供了宝贵的见解。它还强调了审慎的现金管理,敦促企业,尤其是那些有反收购条款和管理层过于自信的企业,重新考虑财务政策,以降低与激进决策相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信