Development and validation of a lifting‐line code associated with the vortex particle method software Dorothy

Wind Energy Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1002/we.2905
M.‐A. Dufour, G. Pinon, E. Rivoalen, F. Blondel, G. Germain
{"title":"Development and validation of a lifting‐line code associated with the vortex particle method software Dorothy","authors":"M.‐A. Dufour, G. Pinon, E. Rivoalen, F. Blondel, G. Germain","doi":"10.1002/we.2905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a lifting‐line implementation in the framework of a Lagrangian vortex particle method (LL‐VP). The novelty of the present implementation lies in the fluid particles properties definition and in the particles shedding process. In spite of mimicking a panel method, the LL‐VP needs some peculiar treatments described in the paper. The present implementation converges rapidly and efficiently during the shedding sub‐iteration process. This LL‐VP method shows good accuracy, even with moderate numbers of sections. Compared to its panel or vortex filaments counterparts, more frequently encountered in the literature, the present implementation inherently accounts for the diffusion term of the Navier‐Stokes equations, possibly with a turbulent viscosity model. Additionally, the present implementation can also account for more complex onset flows: upstream ambient turbulence and upstream turbine wakes. After validation on an analytical elliptic wing configuration, the model is tested on the Mexnext‐III wind turbine application, for three reduced velocities. Accurate results are obtained both on the analytical elliptic wing and on the New MEXICO rotor cases in comparison with other similar numerical models. A focus is made on the Mexnext‐III wake analysis. The numerical wake obtained with the present LL‐VP is close to other numerical and experimental results. Finally, a last configuration with three tidal turbines in interaction is considered based on an experimental campaign carried out at the IFREMER wave and current flume tank. Enhanced turbine‐wake interactions are highlighted, with favourable comparisons with the experiment. Hence, such turbine interactions in a farm are accessible with this LL‐VP implementation, be it wind or tidal energy field.","PeriodicalId":506912,"journal":{"name":"Wind Energy","volume":"55 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wind Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a lifting‐line implementation in the framework of a Lagrangian vortex particle method (LL‐VP). The novelty of the present implementation lies in the fluid particles properties definition and in the particles shedding process. In spite of mimicking a panel method, the LL‐VP needs some peculiar treatments described in the paper. The present implementation converges rapidly and efficiently during the shedding sub‐iteration process. This LL‐VP method shows good accuracy, even with moderate numbers of sections. Compared to its panel or vortex filaments counterparts, more frequently encountered in the literature, the present implementation inherently accounts for the diffusion term of the Navier‐Stokes equations, possibly with a turbulent viscosity model. Additionally, the present implementation can also account for more complex onset flows: upstream ambient turbulence and upstream turbine wakes. After validation on an analytical elliptic wing configuration, the model is tested on the Mexnext‐III wind turbine application, for three reduced velocities. Accurate results are obtained both on the analytical elliptic wing and on the New MEXICO rotor cases in comparison with other similar numerical models. A focus is made on the Mexnext‐III wake analysis. The numerical wake obtained with the present LL‐VP is close to other numerical and experimental results. Finally, a last configuration with three tidal turbines in interaction is considered based on an experimental campaign carried out at the IFREMER wave and current flume tank. Enhanced turbine‐wake interactions are highlighted, with favourable comparisons with the experiment. Hence, such turbine interactions in a farm are accessible with this LL‐VP implementation, be it wind or tidal energy field.
开发和验证与涡旋粒子法软件多萝西相关的提升线代码
本文介绍了在拉格朗日涡旋粒子法(LL-VP)框架内的提升线实现方法。本实施方案的新颖之处在于流体粒子特性定义和粒子脱落过程。尽管 LL-VP 模拟的是面板方法,但需要本文所述的一些特殊处理方法。本实施方案在脱落子迭代过程中收敛速度快、效率高。这种 LL-VP 方法即使在截面数量适中的情况下也能显示出良好的精度。与文献中更常见的面板或涡流丝对应方法相比,本实施方案在本质上考虑了纳维-斯托克斯方程的扩散项,可能使用了湍流粘度模型。此外,本实施方案还可以考虑更复杂的起始流:上游环境湍流和上游涡轮湍流。在对分析椭圆翼配置进行验证后,该模型在 Mexnext-III 风机应用中进行了测试,测试了三种降低的速度。与其他类似的数值模型相比,分析椭圆翼和 New MEXICO 转子案例都获得了精确的结果。重点是 Mexnext-III 的尾流分析。本 LL-VP 所获得的数值尾流与其他数值和实验结果接近。最后,根据在法国海洋所波浪和海流水槽进行的实验活动,考虑了三个潮汐涡轮机相互作用的最后一种配置。与实验结果相比,涡轮机与波浪的相互作用得到了加强。因此,无论是风能还是潮汐能领域,都可以通过 LL-VP 实现风电场中涡轮机的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信