1990s dinomania: Public and popular cultures of palaeontology from Jurassic Park to Friends

Amy C. Chambers, Daniella McCahey
{"title":"1990s dinomania: Public and popular cultures of palaeontology from Jurassic Park to Friends","authors":"Amy C. Chambers, Daniella McCahey","doi":"10.1177/03080188241233121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1990s, the English-speaking world was swept up in a deluge of popular cultural content on palaeontology. Dinosaurs were featured in programming ranging from B-movie horrors to children's cartoon franchises to popular novels. In some ways, this widespread public interest in palaeontology was mirroring broader public and scientific conflicts such as the Alverez hypothesis, the ‘birds are dinosaurs’ debate, ownership rights over dinosaur fossils, intelligent design and creationism in schools, and major DNA sequencing projects. But in other ways, this popular culture material existed beyond these specific debates, and speaks to the ways that depictions of palaeontology fostered public understanding of science in this period. Perhaps no two depictions of palaeontology frame different, and in some ways conflicting, aspects of the field better than two of the biggest popular culture phenomena of the 1990s: Jurassic Park and Friends. Jurassic Park, for which we are approaching the 30th anniversary of its initial release, spawned two sequels within a decade, and three more since then. The heroes of the original movie were two palaeontologists, Alan Grant (Sam Neill) and Ellie Sattler (Laura Dern). Friends, which aired 1994-2004, was certainly the most successful sitcom of the period and one of the most popular television shows of all time. One of the six main characters, Ross Geller (David Schwimmer), is a palaeontologist, who at the beginning of the series works for the American Museum of Natural History and by the show's conclusion, has received tenure at New York University. The depiction of palaeontology in these two programs could not be more different. Drs. Grant and Sattler are competent action heroes, whose expertise regarding dinosaur morphology and behaviour are central to both their survival and their identity. Notably, the filmmakers for Jurassic Park centred the science of palaeontology in its story, working close with palaeontologist Jack Horner. They were also helped by the fact that their source material, Michael Crichton's 1990 novel of the same name, closely engages with scientific ideas and ethics. For Ross Geller on the other hand, his career as a palaeontologist is only on the outskirts of the TV series. Viewers occasionally saw Ross in professional settings (the classroom, the museum, a conference, a fellowship interview), but are not provided with enough information to even determine what sort of research he even does. The focus is always on his personal life; his interest in dinosaurs is just one aspect of his personality, one that does not even get mentioned in many episodes. It thus offers an unusual representation of scientists and science as fully integrated into society and the lived experiences of non-scientists. The palaeoscience occurs off-screen as a facet of the character rather than their defining characteristic. In this article, the authors will situate Friends and Jurassic Park within the dinosaur-mania of the 1990s, while analysing the different versions of palaeontological study that they projected to the public. It will draw connections between how palaeontology was depicted on-screen to the major real-life debates and discoveries in the field at the same time.","PeriodicalId":509618,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","volume":"3 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03080188241233121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 1990s, the English-speaking world was swept up in a deluge of popular cultural content on palaeontology. Dinosaurs were featured in programming ranging from B-movie horrors to children's cartoon franchises to popular novels. In some ways, this widespread public interest in palaeontology was mirroring broader public and scientific conflicts such as the Alverez hypothesis, the ‘birds are dinosaurs’ debate, ownership rights over dinosaur fossils, intelligent design and creationism in schools, and major DNA sequencing projects. But in other ways, this popular culture material existed beyond these specific debates, and speaks to the ways that depictions of palaeontology fostered public understanding of science in this period. Perhaps no two depictions of palaeontology frame different, and in some ways conflicting, aspects of the field better than two of the biggest popular culture phenomena of the 1990s: Jurassic Park and Friends. Jurassic Park, for which we are approaching the 30th anniversary of its initial release, spawned two sequels within a decade, and three more since then. The heroes of the original movie were two palaeontologists, Alan Grant (Sam Neill) and Ellie Sattler (Laura Dern). Friends, which aired 1994-2004, was certainly the most successful sitcom of the period and one of the most popular television shows of all time. One of the six main characters, Ross Geller (David Schwimmer), is a palaeontologist, who at the beginning of the series works for the American Museum of Natural History and by the show's conclusion, has received tenure at New York University. The depiction of palaeontology in these two programs could not be more different. Drs. Grant and Sattler are competent action heroes, whose expertise regarding dinosaur morphology and behaviour are central to both their survival and their identity. Notably, the filmmakers for Jurassic Park centred the science of palaeontology in its story, working close with palaeontologist Jack Horner. They were also helped by the fact that their source material, Michael Crichton's 1990 novel of the same name, closely engages with scientific ideas and ethics. For Ross Geller on the other hand, his career as a palaeontologist is only on the outskirts of the TV series. Viewers occasionally saw Ross in professional settings (the classroom, the museum, a conference, a fellowship interview), but are not provided with enough information to even determine what sort of research he even does. The focus is always on his personal life; his interest in dinosaurs is just one aspect of his personality, one that does not even get mentioned in many episodes. It thus offers an unusual representation of scientists and science as fully integrated into society and the lived experiences of non-scientists. The palaeoscience occurs off-screen as a facet of the character rather than their defining characteristic. In this article, the authors will situate Friends and Jurassic Park within the dinosaur-mania of the 1990s, while analysing the different versions of palaeontological study that they projected to the public. It will draw connections between how palaeontology was depicted on-screen to the major real-life debates and discoveries in the field at the same time.
1990 年代的恐龙狂热:从《侏罗纪公园》到《朋友》中的古生物学公共文化和大众文化
20 世纪 90 年代,英语世界被大量有关古生物学的流行文化内容所席卷。从恐怖 B 级片到儿童卡通系列片,再到流行小说,各种节目中都出现了恐龙的身影。在某些方面,公众对古生物学的广泛兴趣反映了更广泛的公众和科学冲突,如阿尔韦罗斯假说、"鸟类是恐龙 "的争论、恐龙化石的所有权、学校中的智能设计和创造论,以及重大的DNA测序项目。但在其他方面,这些大众文化材料的存在超越了这些具体的争论,也说明了古生物学的描述在这一时期促进了公众对科学的理解。也许没有哪两部关于古生物学的作品能比 20 世纪 90 年代的两大流行文化现象更好地诠释这一领域的不同方面,在某些方面甚至是相互冲突的方面:侏罗纪公园》和《朋友》。侏罗纪公园》(Jurassic Park)即将迎来上映 30 周年,它在十年内推出了两部续集,此后又推出了三部续集。原版电影的主人公是两位古生物学家艾伦-格兰特(萨姆-尼尔饰)和艾莉-萨特勒(劳拉-邓恩饰)。朋友》于 1994-2004 年播出,无疑是这一时期最成功的情景喜剧,也是有史以来最受欢迎的电视节目之一。剧中六位主角之一的罗斯-盖勒(大卫-施维默 David Schwimmer 饰)是一位古生物学家,在剧集开始时,他在美国自然历史博物馆工作,而在剧集结束时,他已经获得了纽约大学的终身教职。这两个节目中对古生物学的描述完全不同。格兰特博士和萨特勒博士是称职的行动英雄,他们在恐龙形态和行为方面的专业知识是他们生存和身份的核心。值得注意的是,《侏罗纪公园》的制片人与古生物学家杰克-霍纳(Jack Horner)密切合作,将古生物学作为故事的中心。迈克尔-克莱顿(Michael Crichton)1990 年出版的同名小说也为他们提供了帮助,该小说与科学思想和伦理道德密切相关。另一方面,对于罗斯-盖勒来说,他的古生物学家生涯在电视剧中只处于边缘地位。观众偶尔会在专业场合(教室、博物馆、会议、奖学金面试)看到罗斯的身影,但却无法获得足够的信息,甚至无法确定他到底从事什么样的研究。重点总是放在他的个人生活上;他对恐龙的兴趣只是他个性的一个方面,甚至在很多剧集中都没有提及。因此,该剧不同寻常地表现了科学家和科学完全融入社会以及非科学家的生活经历。古科学作为人物的一个侧面出现在屏幕之外,而不是他们的决定性特征。在本文中,作者将把《朋友》和《侏罗纪公园》置于 20 世纪 90 年代的恐龙狂热之中,同时分析它们向公众展示的不同版本的古生物学研究。文章将把古生物学在银幕上的表现形式与现实生活中的重大辩论和发现联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信