The role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and systemic immune inflammation index in predicting the necessity for surgery and therapeutic surgery in patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds.

Muhammed Taha Demirpolat, M. Islam
{"title":"The role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and systemic immune inflammation index in predicting the necessity for surgery and therapeutic surgery in patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds.","authors":"Muhammed Taha Demirpolat, M. Islam","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nIn this diagnostic accuracy study, we examined the effectiveness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) in predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds (AASW) who exhibit unclear findings on physical examination yet remain hemodynamically stable.\n\n\nMETHODS\nOver a 7-year period, patients with AASW were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups as surgical (SG) and nonsurgical group (nSG). The SG were also divided into two groups as therapeutic surgery (TS) group and the non-therapeutic surgery (nTS) group. The groups were compared in terms of NLR, PLR values and SII scores.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn a retrospective analysis of 199 patients with AASW, NLR, PLR and SII obtained during clinical follow-up of patients with AASW in whom the necessity for immediate surgery was unclear significantly predicted therapeutic surgery (p < 0.001 for all). These parameters did not show a significant difference in predicting the need for surgery at the admission. NLR showed an AUC of 0.971 and performed significantly better than PLR and SII (AUC = 0.874 and 0.902, respectively) in predicting TS. The optimal cut-off value for NLR was 3.33, with a sensitivity of 98.2%, a specificity of 90%, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.02. Time from admission to surgery was significantly shorter in the TS group (p = 0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nNLR, PLR and SII values may be useful in predicting therapeutic surgery during clinical follow-up in AASW patients with unclear physical examination findings and in whom immediate surgical decisions cannot be made.","PeriodicalId":507313,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":"144 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND In this diagnostic accuracy study, we examined the effectiveness of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII) in predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds (AASW) who exhibit unclear findings on physical examination yet remain hemodynamically stable. METHODS Over a 7-year period, patients with AASW were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups as surgical (SG) and nonsurgical group (nSG). The SG were also divided into two groups as therapeutic surgery (TS) group and the non-therapeutic surgery (nTS) group. The groups were compared in terms of NLR, PLR values and SII scores. RESULTS In a retrospective analysis of 199 patients with AASW, NLR, PLR and SII obtained during clinical follow-up of patients with AASW in whom the necessity for immediate surgery was unclear significantly predicted therapeutic surgery (p < 0.001 for all). These parameters did not show a significant difference in predicting the need for surgery at the admission. NLR showed an AUC of 0.971 and performed significantly better than PLR and SII (AUC = 0.874 and 0.902, respectively) in predicting TS. The optimal cut-off value for NLR was 3.33, with a sensitivity of 98.2%, a specificity of 90%, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.02. Time from admission to surgery was significantly shorter in the TS group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION NLR, PLR and SII values may be useful in predicting therapeutic surgery during clinical follow-up in AASW patients with unclear physical examination findings and in whom immediate surgical decisions cannot be made.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率、血小板与淋巴细胞比率以及全身免疫炎症指数在预测前腹部刀伤患者是否需要手术和治疗性手术中的作用。
背景在这项诊断准确性研究中,我们考察了中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)在预测前腹部刀刺伤(AASW)患者是否需要手术干预方面的有效性。患者被分为两组,即手术组(SG)和非手术组(nSG)。手术组又分为治疗性手术(TS)组和非治疗性手术(nTS)组。结果在对 199 例 AASW 患者进行的回顾性分析中,在临床随访期间获得的 NLR、PLR 和 SII 显著预示着治疗性手术(所有参数的 p 均小于 0.001)。这些参数在预测入院时的手术需求方面没有明显差异。NLR 的 AUC 为 0.971,在预测 TS 方面明显优于 PLR 和 SII(AUC 分别为 0.874 和 0.902)。NLR 的最佳临界值为 3.33,灵敏度为 98.2%,特异度为 90%,负似然比为 0.02。结论NLR、PLR和SII值可用于预测体格检查结果不明确且无法立即决定手术的AASW患者在临床随访期间的治疗性手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信