Evaluation of Three Different Contact Plate Methods for Microbial Surface Sampling of Naturally Occurring Human Borne Microbial Contamination

Tim Eaton, Karen Capper, M. Ward, J. Bright
{"title":"Evaluation of Three Different Contact Plate Methods for Microbial Surface Sampling of Naturally Occurring Human Borne Microbial Contamination","authors":"Tim Eaton, Karen Capper, M. Ward, J. Bright","doi":"10.37521/ejpps.29101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability of irradiated 55 mm diameter tryptone soya agar contact plates to recover naturally occurring surface microbial contamination, using three different manual sampling procedures, was investigated. The investigation was completed by sampling hard surfaces contaminated with microbe-carrying particles (MCPs) dispersed from a person within heavily populated environments. This is more representative of the contamination that is found within cleanrooms and avoids issues resulting from the utilisation of standard commercial test organisms to distribute unicellular microbes onto surfaces, which are likely to be transferred to the plate with different efficiencies compared to the naturally occurring MCPs. It was determined that rolling the contact plate media over the surface, using firm pressure for either 1 or 5 seconds recorded little differences in the mean recovery efficiencies (53% and 48% respectively). However, both recorded significantly higher efficiencies than just a single 1 second press of the media onto the surface with firm pressure (16%). \n\n\nIntroduction\nFor sterile products manufacturing, it is a requirement of Annex 1 of the European Union Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice (EU GGMP) ¹ that microbiological monitoring of cleanrooms includes the use of 55 mm diameter contact plates for sampling defined surface locations. The Guide includes limits to be applied to this monitoring and the expectation is that supporting data for the recovery efficiency of the sampling method should be available. \n\nTypically, circular RODAC (replicate organism detection and counting) plates (55 mm diameter, 24 cm² surface area) containing nutrient agar (between 15.5 and 16 ml) are used for sampling surfaces that are relatively flat. They are poured to give an agar meniscus that protrudes just above the rim, and are based upon plates that were originally reported on in 1964 ². They are easy to use and require minimal training and the full area of the nutrient agar is rolled over the surface to be sampled, facilitated by the convex media profile, or they can be applied to the surface for a few seconds ensuring uniform and steady pressure with no rolling action. Viable particles removed from the surface adhere to the agar and the lidded plates are then incubated and examined and the number of colony forming units (CFU) and types of micro-organisms recovered are reported and the results expressed as the number of CFU per plate. \n\nThe recovery efficiency will be affected by many factors, including the sort of plate media used, the type of micro-organisms present on the surface and the material and finish of the surfaces ³ to be sampled. It will also be influenced by the contact area of the plate media with the surface being sampled and may be influenced by the associated duration of this contact, both of which are associated with the plate sampling method. To reduce variations associated with these two parameters, there are commercially available plate holding devices which can be utilised for the sampling that apply the same pressure each time and also have an indicator of the specified contact time, that can be set for different durations. However, the surface sampling is typically a manual procedure that does not utilise such devices and the application method and contact time are reliant on the person undertaking the sampling and hence this is likely to be more variable. \n\nIn order to determine a convenient manual sampling procedure that can be routinely used to provide more consistency of practice, three different methods were tested. Surfaces associated with three different areas, each used on a daily basis by numerous people, were utilised. These surfaces are continually contaminated with naturally occurring microbe-carrying particles (MCPs), predominantly dispersed from personnel, in relatively large numbers, and are representative of the majority of the microbes recovered from cleanroom environments. Actual cleanroom surfaces were not utilised as the surface concentrations are too low and accurate results less likely be obtained. The use of these naturally occurring MCPs also avoids issues resulting from the utilisation of standard commercial test organisms and a carrier medium to deposit suspensions of micro-organisms onto the test surfaces. Upon evaporation of the carrier medium, sub-micron unicellular microbes are distributed across the surfaces which are not representative of the larger MCPs present in cleanrooms which have an average aerodynamic diameter of about 8 μm to 12 μm ⁴ ⁵ ⁶. On contact, these unicellular microbes may be transferred to the plate with different efficiencies compared to the larger size naturally occurring MCPs, for which the efficiency is likely to be greater. \n\nBench and floor surfaces in laboratory and amenities areas, contaminated with MCPs, in sufficient numbers (typically greater than 20 MCPs) that could be used for the comparison of the three sampling methods, were identified from a preliminary study. From each of three adjacent but separate positions at 20 different locations, two sequential samples were taken from the exact same place using the three different sampling methods. Following incubation of the plates, the number of recovered CFUs were counted and the recovery efficiencies for each sampling method determined from the two samples, for each location, and an average efficiency then calculated. The resultant data was reviewed in order to determine if the recovery of surface microorganisms was influenced by the sampling method and the type of surfaces sampled and to also provide recommendations for the most appropriate sampling procedure for routine use to help to ensure consistency of practice.","PeriodicalId":300408,"journal":{"name":"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES","volume":"10 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37521/ejpps.29101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability of irradiated 55 mm diameter tryptone soya agar contact plates to recover naturally occurring surface microbial contamination, using three different manual sampling procedures, was investigated. The investigation was completed by sampling hard surfaces contaminated with microbe-carrying particles (MCPs) dispersed from a person within heavily populated environments. This is more representative of the contamination that is found within cleanrooms and avoids issues resulting from the utilisation of standard commercial test organisms to distribute unicellular microbes onto surfaces, which are likely to be transferred to the plate with different efficiencies compared to the naturally occurring MCPs. It was determined that rolling the contact plate media over the surface, using firm pressure for either 1 or 5 seconds recorded little differences in the mean recovery efficiencies (53% and 48% respectively). However, both recorded significantly higher efficiencies than just a single 1 second press of the media onto the surface with firm pressure (16%). Introduction For sterile products manufacturing, it is a requirement of Annex 1 of the European Union Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice (EU GGMP) ¹ that microbiological monitoring of cleanrooms includes the use of 55 mm diameter contact plates for sampling defined surface locations. The Guide includes limits to be applied to this monitoring and the expectation is that supporting data for the recovery efficiency of the sampling method should be available. Typically, circular RODAC (replicate organism detection and counting) plates (55 mm diameter, 24 cm² surface area) containing nutrient agar (between 15.5 and 16 ml) are used for sampling surfaces that are relatively flat. They are poured to give an agar meniscus that protrudes just above the rim, and are based upon plates that were originally reported on in 1964 ². They are easy to use and require minimal training and the full area of the nutrient agar is rolled over the surface to be sampled, facilitated by the convex media profile, or they can be applied to the surface for a few seconds ensuring uniform and steady pressure with no rolling action. Viable particles removed from the surface adhere to the agar and the lidded plates are then incubated and examined and the number of colony forming units (CFU) and types of micro-organisms recovered are reported and the results expressed as the number of CFU per plate. The recovery efficiency will be affected by many factors, including the sort of plate media used, the type of micro-organisms present on the surface and the material and finish of the surfaces ³ to be sampled. It will also be influenced by the contact area of the plate media with the surface being sampled and may be influenced by the associated duration of this contact, both of which are associated with the plate sampling method. To reduce variations associated with these two parameters, there are commercially available plate holding devices which can be utilised for the sampling that apply the same pressure each time and also have an indicator of the specified contact time, that can be set for different durations. However, the surface sampling is typically a manual procedure that does not utilise such devices and the application method and contact time are reliant on the person undertaking the sampling and hence this is likely to be more variable. In order to determine a convenient manual sampling procedure that can be routinely used to provide more consistency of practice, three different methods were tested. Surfaces associated with three different areas, each used on a daily basis by numerous people, were utilised. These surfaces are continually contaminated with naturally occurring microbe-carrying particles (MCPs), predominantly dispersed from personnel, in relatively large numbers, and are representative of the majority of the microbes recovered from cleanroom environments. Actual cleanroom surfaces were not utilised as the surface concentrations are too low and accurate results less likely be obtained. The use of these naturally occurring MCPs also avoids issues resulting from the utilisation of standard commercial test organisms and a carrier medium to deposit suspensions of micro-organisms onto the test surfaces. Upon evaporation of the carrier medium, sub-micron unicellular microbes are distributed across the surfaces which are not representative of the larger MCPs present in cleanrooms which have an average aerodynamic diameter of about 8 μm to 12 μm ⁴ ⁵ ⁶. On contact, these unicellular microbes may be transferred to the plate with different efficiencies compared to the larger size naturally occurring MCPs, for which the efficiency is likely to be greater. Bench and floor surfaces in laboratory and amenities areas, contaminated with MCPs, in sufficient numbers (typically greater than 20 MCPs) that could be used for the comparison of the three sampling methods, were identified from a preliminary study. From each of three adjacent but separate positions at 20 different locations, two sequential samples were taken from the exact same place using the three different sampling methods. Following incubation of the plates, the number of recovered CFUs were counted and the recovery efficiencies for each sampling method determined from the two samples, for each location, and an average efficiency then calculated. The resultant data was reviewed in order to determine if the recovery of surface microorganisms was influenced by the sampling method and the type of surfaces sampled and to also provide recommendations for the most appropriate sampling procedure for routine use to help to ensure consistency of practice.
对三种不同的接触板法进行评估,以对自然存在的人源性微生物污染进行微生物表面采样
通过初步研究,确定实验室和生活区的工作台和地板表面受到的多氯联苯污染数量足够多(通常超过 20 个多氯联苯),可用于对三种取样方法进行比较。在 20 个不同地点的三个相邻但独立的位置上,使用三种不同的取样方法从完全相同的地方依次采集了两个样本。平板培养后,计算回收的 CFU 数量,并从每个地点的两个样本中确定每种取样方法的回收率,然后计算平均回收率。对所得数据进行审查,以确定表面微生物的回收率是否受采样方法和采样表面类型的影响,并就最适合日常使用的采样程序提出建议,以帮助确保做法的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信