Taking the plunge, juggling acts, and friendly fire

Catriona Adano, Geoff Bunn
{"title":"Taking the plunge, juggling acts, and friendly fire","authors":"Catriona Adano, Geoff Bunn","doi":"10.56433/jpaap.v12i1.566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students embarking on higher education confront many challenges. Particularly since the Covid-19 pandemic, universities have become increasingly concerned to address these challenges and to develop comprehensive strategies to nurture student wellbeing. Distance learning courses create additional pressures, however, and not only because online students tend to be older than typical undergraduate student cohorts and therefore present with an array of social and caring responsibilities at the point of enrolment. The present study’s objectives were to explore how distance learning students describe their experiences of online learning, with a particular focus on their engagement with their course, their lifestyle and wellbeing challenges, and their interactions with staff and fellow students. Developing Shinebourne and Smith’s (2010) innovative phenomenology coupled with experiential metaphor methodology, we employed a two-stage data collection methodology based on participant diaries and follow-up interviews. In Stage 1, diaries captured student experiences in real time. Diary entry data subsequently informed the schedules of the semi-structured interviews that followed in Stage 2. Metaphorical analysis provided insight into online students’ lifeworlds, in terms of the practical challenges of balancing roles with time pressures, the existential struggle of forging a new identity, and the search for meaningful interpersonal connections. Six inter-related metaphors were unearthed: ‘Plunging into the Deep’; ‘Impostor Syndrome’; ‘A Precariously Balanced Juggling Act’; ‘The Gift of Time’; ‘Hostile Territories and Friendly Fire’; and ‘House of Cards’. Confirming and extending previous work, our findings demonstrate that online distance learning is a journey of self-doubt and discovery interrupted by both traumatic and transformative moments as students strive to succeed against multiple existential threats. We recommend that universities devote resources to facilitating an understanding of online students’ unique circumstances to provide them with informed and effective wellbeing support at the start of and throughout their journeys.","PeriodicalId":498818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice","volume":"20 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v12i1.566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Students embarking on higher education confront many challenges. Particularly since the Covid-19 pandemic, universities have become increasingly concerned to address these challenges and to develop comprehensive strategies to nurture student wellbeing. Distance learning courses create additional pressures, however, and not only because online students tend to be older than typical undergraduate student cohorts and therefore present with an array of social and caring responsibilities at the point of enrolment. The present study’s objectives were to explore how distance learning students describe their experiences of online learning, with a particular focus on their engagement with their course, their lifestyle and wellbeing challenges, and their interactions with staff and fellow students. Developing Shinebourne and Smith’s (2010) innovative phenomenology coupled with experiential metaphor methodology, we employed a two-stage data collection methodology based on participant diaries and follow-up interviews. In Stage 1, diaries captured student experiences in real time. Diary entry data subsequently informed the schedules of the semi-structured interviews that followed in Stage 2. Metaphorical analysis provided insight into online students’ lifeworlds, in terms of the practical challenges of balancing roles with time pressures, the existential struggle of forging a new identity, and the search for meaningful interpersonal connections. Six inter-related metaphors were unearthed: ‘Plunging into the Deep’; ‘Impostor Syndrome’; ‘A Precariously Balanced Juggling Act’; ‘The Gift of Time’; ‘Hostile Territories and Friendly Fire’; and ‘House of Cards’. Confirming and extending previous work, our findings demonstrate that online distance learning is a journey of self-doubt and discovery interrupted by both traumatic and transformative moments as students strive to succeed against multiple existential threats. We recommend that universities devote resources to facilitating an understanding of online students’ unique circumstances to provide them with informed and effective wellbeing support at the start of and throughout their journeys.
铤而走险、杂耍和友军误伤
接受高等教育的学生面临着许多挑战。特别是自 19 世纪科维德大流行病以来,各大学越来越关注如何应对这些挑战,并制定全面的战略来培养学生的健康成长。然而,远程学习课程带来了额外的压力,这不仅是因为在线学生往往比典型的本科生群体年龄更大,因此在入学时就肩负着一系列的社会和照顾责任。本研究的目的是探索远程学习学生如何描述他们的在线学习经历,尤其关注他们对课程的参与、他们的生活方式和福利挑战,以及他们与教职员工和同学的互动。根据 Shinebourne 和 Smith(2010 年)的创新现象学和体验隐喻方法,我们采用了基于参与者日记和后续访谈的两阶段数据收集方法。在第一阶段,日记记录了学生的实时体验。日记数据为第二阶段的半结构式访谈提供了依据。隐喻分析有助于深入了解在线学生的生活世界,包括平衡角色与时间压力的实际挑战、塑造新身份的生存斗争以及寻找有意义的人际联系。我们发现了六个相互关联的隐喻:"深陷泥潭"、"冒名顶替综合症"、"岌岌可危的平衡杂耍"、"时间的礼物"、"敌对领土和友军炮火 "以及 "纸牌屋"。我们的研究结果证实并扩展了之前的研究,表明在线远程学习是一个自我怀疑和发现的旅程,学生们在努力成功应对多重生存威胁的过程中,既有痛苦的时刻,也有转变的时刻。我们建议各大学投入资源,促进对在线学生独特情况的了解,以便在他们开始学习和学习的整个过程中,为他们提供知情和有效的健康支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信