Contemporary Research on Agency in Education: A Systematization of Key Concepts and Developments

Pavel S. Sorokin, Timofey D. Redko
{"title":"Contemporary Research on Agency in Education: A Systematization of Key Concepts and Developments","authors":"Pavel S. Sorokin, Timofey D. Redko","doi":"10.17323/vo-2024-18131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The task of developing individual \"agency\" (autonomy, proactivity, initiative, etc.), in education is widely discussed in scientific and practical circles. To systematize multi-disciplinary research elaborations in the field of \"agency\" as an umbrella concept, an analysis was carried out using keywords in the main scientific database Scopus. The analysis includes both publications that directly use the concept, and works using other close terms (resistance, autonomy, initiative, etc.). In addition, a sample of scientific publications of researchers, most authoritative in the field of practical educational policy was separately considered. The systematization of the key concepts and constructs was based on four main criteria: 1) the distinction between “agentic” action and intention/perspective, 2) the scale of the action, 3) the strategic/non-strategic nature of the intention/perspective, 4) the universal/local applicability of the concept or construct. The analysis showed a dominating focus on the \"agentic perspective\" in the discovered works, as well as a focus on micro-level and local manifestations and effects of “agentic” behavior or plans. From the point of view of empirical indicators of \"agency\" and related concepts, necessity for operationalization of the action-based and \"strategic\" manifestations of agency are revealed, which raises the question of the fundamental adequacy of the current approaches to measuring a human being dominating in contemporary mainstream of social sciences.","PeriodicalId":512224,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow","volume":"21 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-18131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The task of developing individual "agency" (autonomy, proactivity, initiative, etc.), in education is widely discussed in scientific and practical circles. To systematize multi-disciplinary research elaborations in the field of "agency" as an umbrella concept, an analysis was carried out using keywords in the main scientific database Scopus. The analysis includes both publications that directly use the concept, and works using other close terms (resistance, autonomy, initiative, etc.). In addition, a sample of scientific publications of researchers, most authoritative in the field of practical educational policy was separately considered. The systematization of the key concepts and constructs was based on four main criteria: 1) the distinction between “agentic” action and intention/perspective, 2) the scale of the action, 3) the strategic/non-strategic nature of the intention/perspective, 4) the universal/local applicability of the concept or construct. The analysis showed a dominating focus on the "agentic perspective" in the discovered works, as well as a focus on micro-level and local manifestations and effects of “agentic” behavior or plans. From the point of view of empirical indicators of "agency" and related concepts, necessity for operationalization of the action-based and "strategic" manifestations of agency are revealed, which raises the question of the fundamental adequacy of the current approaches to measuring a human being dominating in contemporary mainstream of social sciences.
当代教育代理研究:关键概念和发展的系统化
科学界和实践界广泛讨论了在教育中培养个人 "能动性"(自主性、积极性、主动性等)的任务。为了使 "能动性 "这一总括概念的多学科研究阐述系统化,我们利用主要科学数据库 Scopus 中的关键词进行了分析。分析既包括直接使用这一概念的出版物,也包括使用其他近似术语(抵抗、自主、主动性等)的作品。此外,还单独考虑了在实际教育政策领域最具权威的研究人员的科学出版物样本。主要概念和概念的系统化基于四个主要标准:1) "代理 "行动与意图/观点之间的区别,2) 行动的规模,3) 意图/观点的战略/非战略性质,4) 概念或构 想的普遍/本地适用性。分析表明,在已发现的作品中,"行动者视角 "占主导地位,"行动者 "行为或计划在微观和地方层面的表现和效果也是重点。从 "代理 "及相关概念的实证指标的角度来看,有必要将代理的行动和 "战略 "表现形式操作化,这就提出了一个问题,即目前在当代社会科学主流中占主导地位的衡量人类的方法是否基本适当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信