Multicriteria decision-making for optimization of welding parameters in cold metal transfer and pulse metal-inert gas weld bead of AA2099-T86 alloy using CRITIC and ROV methods

IF 1.7 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Satyaveer Singh, N. Yuvaraj, Reeta Wattal
{"title":"Multicriteria decision-making for optimization of welding parameters in cold metal transfer and pulse metal-inert gas weld bead of AA2099-T86 alloy using CRITIC and ROV methods","authors":"Satyaveer Singh, N. Yuvaraj, Reeta Wattal","doi":"10.1108/mmms-07-2023-0250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) and range of value (ROV) combined methods were used to determine a single index for all multiple responses.Design/methodology/approachThis paper used cold metal transfer (CMT) and pulse metal-inert gas (MIG) welding processes to study the weld-on-bead geometry of AA2099-T86 alloy. This study used Taguchi's approach to find the optimal setting of the input welding parameters. The welding current, welding speed and contact-tip-to workpiece distance were the input welding parameters for finding the output responses, i.e. weld penetration, dilution and heat input. The L9 orthogonal array of Taguchi's approach was used to find out the optimal setting of the input parameters.FindingsThe optimal input welding parameters were determined with combined output responses. The predicted optimum welding input parameters were validated through confirmation tests. Analysis of variance showed that welding speed is the most influential factor in determining the weld bead geometry of the CMT and pulse MIG welding techniques.Originality/valueThe heat input and weld bead geometry are compared in both welding processes. The CMT welding samples show superior defect-free weld beads than pulse MIG welding due to lesser heat input and lesser dilution.","PeriodicalId":46760,"journal":{"name":"Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mmms-07-2023-0250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) and range of value (ROV) combined methods were used to determine a single index for all multiple responses.Design/methodology/approachThis paper used cold metal transfer (CMT) and pulse metal-inert gas (MIG) welding processes to study the weld-on-bead geometry of AA2099-T86 alloy. This study used Taguchi's approach to find the optimal setting of the input welding parameters. The welding current, welding speed and contact-tip-to workpiece distance were the input welding parameters for finding the output responses, i.e. weld penetration, dilution and heat input. The L9 orthogonal array of Taguchi's approach was used to find out the optimal setting of the input parameters.FindingsThe optimal input welding parameters were determined with combined output responses. The predicted optimum welding input parameters were validated through confirmation tests. Analysis of variance showed that welding speed is the most influential factor in determining the weld bead geometry of the CMT and pulse MIG welding techniques.Originality/valueThe heat input and weld bead geometry are compared in both welding processes. The CMT welding samples show superior defect-free weld beads than pulse MIG welding due to lesser heat input and lesser dilution.
使用 CRITIC 和 ROV 方法优化 AA2099-T86 合金冷金属转移和脉冲金属惰性气体焊缝焊接参数的多标准决策
设计/方法/途径 本文采用冷金属转移(CMT)和脉冲金属惰性气体(MIG)焊接工艺研究 AA2099-T86 合金的焊珠几何形状。本研究采用田口方法找出输入焊接参数的最佳设置。焊接电流、焊接速度和焊头与工件的接触距离为输入焊接参数,用于寻找输出响应,即焊接熔透、稀释和热输入。采用田口方法的 L9 正交阵列找出输入参数的最佳设置。通过确认试验验证了预测的最佳焊接输入参数。方差分析显示,焊接速度是决定 CMT 和脉冲 MIG 焊接技术焊缝几何形状的最大影响因素。由于热输入和稀释较少,CMT 焊接样品比脉冲 MIG 焊接显示出更好的无缺陷焊缝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures is published by Emerald Group Publishing Limited from 2010
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信